Superka

Lives in USSR (former) USSR (former)
Works as a Architect
Has a website at http://superka-photo.com/
Joined on Jun 22, 2009

Comments

Total: 283, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article 2017 Buying Guide: Best cameras for video (140 comments in total)

Gh5 is supposed to be video-oriented. But Panasonic didn't include LOG profile as standart and wants 100$ more for it.
I'll pass gh5 because of that.
Sony a6300, 6500 are the best!

Link | Posted on Dec 10, 2017 at 14:49 UTC as 6th comment | 1 reply
On article 2017 Buying Guide: Best cameras for video (140 comments in total)

Panasonic lx100 should be there. Video is as good, as gx85, but with nice lens included.

Link | Posted on Dec 10, 2017 at 14:39 UTC as 7th comment | 2 replies
On article 2017 Buying Guide: Best cameras for video (140 comments in total)

Gh4 should be in the list. It is much cheaper now, and sells with V log.

Link | Posted on Dec 9, 2017 at 17:11 UTC as 17th comment | 3 replies

Why not recommending Panasonic LX100? Fantastic little camera, better then lx15, which you did mention.

Link | Posted on Nov 22, 2017 at 14:34 UTC as 10th comment
In reply to:

sop51: I'm wondering why DPR chose an image of some ancient Kodak shutter from the 1920s to illustrate this article?

But what they should have chosen?

Link | Posted on Nov 13, 2017 at 23:02 UTC
In reply to:

Kraaketaer: It seems the pixel shift either accentuates chromatic aberrations or introduces some kind of fringing with high contrast lines: look at the fan-shaped paintbrushes or the strands of hair below the ears on the top left model, not to mention the crosshatch patterns in the corners.

+1!

Link | Posted on Nov 12, 2017 at 19:07 UTC

Oh f@ck! Bayer, I hate you!

Link | Posted on Nov 12, 2017 at 18:46 UTC as 190th comment
In reply to:

Superka: Panasonic is a nice company, but their gh4,5 and g9 seems to be overpriced

ozturert compared to Sony a6300/6500

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2017 at 01:03 UTC

Panasonic is a nice company, but their gh4,5 and g9 seems to be overpriced

Link | Posted on Nov 9, 2017 at 19:54 UTC as 34th comment | 4 replies

There are lots of perfect film cameras.
People need perfect scanner, not camera.

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2017 at 22:35 UTC as 96th comment | 4 replies

Film camera should be beautiful! This one is not.
I'd go for Olympus OM, or any other.

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2017 at 22:34 UTC as 97th comment

Not a single interesting image was shot.

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2017 at 23:13 UTC as 61st comment
On article Canon G1 X III vs. Sony Cybershot RX100 V (632 comments in total)

Canon is a clear looser.

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2017 at 18:35 UTC as 122nd comment | 2 replies

No spikes again? No buy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poG__6af9ok

Link | Posted on Oct 9, 2017 at 23:47 UTC as 16th comment

He should have install Technicolor CineStyle color profile to Canon, it boosts DR and colors looks mych better.

Link | Posted on Sep 27, 2017 at 09:23 UTC as 12th comment

Everything worked fine in Windows XP 64 times.
Now you need these beasts for your browser not to lag.

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2017 at 05:16 UTC as 34th comment | 2 replies

I wish they droped the price of their film scanner.

Link | Posted on Sep 13, 2017 at 13:10 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply
On article Video: Nikon D7500 first look (416 comments in total)
In reply to:

Superka: Oh, Nikon, you still here! I forgot about you.

SnapHappy32
Ahhh,,Nikons in the Zoo and museums. Dinosaurs are also there!

Link | Posted on Jun 5, 2017 at 12:31 UTC
On article Video: Nikon D7500 first look (416 comments in total)

Oh, Nikon, you still here! I forgot about you.

Link | Posted on Jun 5, 2017 at 01:32 UTC as 20th comment | 4 replies

Panasonic LX100 is all you need

Link | Posted on May 21, 2017 at 21:21 UTC as 21st comment | 1 reply
Total: 283, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »