Lives in USSR (former) USSR (former)
Works as a Architect
Has a website at
Joined on Jun 22, 2009


Total: 319, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

I still hope Canon will recall r5 and r6 to drill some holes in their bodies.

Link | Posted on Aug 3, 2020 at 01:41 UTC as 12th comment | 2 replies
On article Tested: Four travel tripods for every budget (357 comments in total)

no matter how solid is the construction of the tripod, it will woble on every uneven surface, such ad grass, leaves if it has no spikes. The spikes is the main point to concern, if you think about shooting outdoors.
The article was made by parquet shooter.

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2020 at 20:01 UTC as 31st comment

Windows version, please!

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2020 at 09:41 UTC as 8th comment
In reply to:

digilux: Air conditioning is better, but I still like to open the windows......
depending on where you live, an open window is healthier and better for the enviroment

Automatic transmissions are better, but I still prefer a clutch pedal.
If you are lazy yes, but race or rallyecars have manual boxes

Air travel is better, but I still like to drive or take the train
Better in polluting? Noise? Air travel is a plague and corona would not have been a pandemic without it.

exactly. Saing just "better" without mentioning for what and for whom is a non-sense.

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2020 at 13:37 UTC

Really the article is by audiofillic, almost nothing told about really different overall look from film.
Also that's just non-sense to say "digital is better". Better for what? For whom?
I do not happy with handling the film, I never process it, never print at home from negatives.
But I love film because it can be panoramic (I have Xpan and 617), because film has natural highlight rollof, amazing DR, interesting soft colors.
This is melomanic aproach, not audiofillic. I love the film because of the result, the process is also a joy, but shooting digital is a joy either.

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2020 at 13:25 UTC as 18th comment | 2 replies

Awasome! Thank you for your magic!

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2020 at 00:40 UTC as 2nd comment

Very nice to see screw-in spikes for shooting on grass. And the price is ok. But defenetly wish more height.
Still these are good

Link | Posted on Feb 28, 2020 at 02:27 UTC as 14th comment | 2 replies

I was Flickr user since 2006, untill they switched to Fuckr! They did everything wrong! They FORCED users to switch to PRO (threatening to delete their images over 1000), and want tooo many for keeping images. That was aggressive change of rules!
They lost lots of people, nobody to ask to go PRO (even with discount).
When Vimeo switched to PRO for over 500Mb storage, they didn't delete anything over, but block the upload - that's ok! Google services also gives lot for free!
I had lots of images, 99% of them was 2K *.jpg-s (about 3GB) - had to spend lot of time deleting them. No way back.

Link | Posted on Dec 24, 2019 at 05:43 UTC as 11th comment

Is it possible to create sensor with logarythmic response , not linear?

Link | Posted on Oct 12, 2019 at 15:57 UTC as 16th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Roland Karlsson: This is one, of zillions, solution to the problem of clipping. They all have the same problem that lots of logic is needed per pixel. Which makes them impractical for normal usage. The cheapest, so far, is to have several detectors with different sensitivity. But that also eats area.

I'd like to have at least one of this gazillion solutions.
Thanks to German engeneers

Link | Posted on Oct 12, 2019 at 15:54 UTC

Game changer!

Link | Posted on Aug 15, 2019 at 09:46 UTC as 22nd comment

Every camera manufacturer should place internal ND-filters to each camera, as in this beautiful small camera.

Link | Posted on Aug 14, 2019 at 20:08 UTC as 57th comment
In reply to:

thx1138: Geez 5 leg sections is ridiculous, smallest tube will be flimsy as.

Because tripod legs works as a console. The base of it is in hub-joint.

Link | Posted on Jun 23, 2019 at 18:25 UTC

My slik cf 814 from 2008 still works fine. Their SBH- 320 is the most beautiful ball head. I am glad still exist.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2019 at 15:35 UTC as 6th comment
In reply to:

thx1138: Geez 5 leg sections is ridiculous, smallest tube will be flimsy as.

So what? It works fine. Even if the leg had no joints, it must be tiny at the end. That is physics.
The problem is number of joints

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2019 at 15:32 UTC

Go for Samsung m20. Don't thank me.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2019 at 09:09 UTC as 6th comment

I was Flickr user from 2006. Flickr asks 60$ when I chose my country.
I deleted about 4.300 images of architectural photography and some family photos.

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2019 at 23:37 UTC as 16th comment

I do have Fuji tx-1. Nothing compares to it.

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2018 at 10:42 UTC as 7th comment
On article Panasonic DC-LX100 II Review (1123 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ben O Connor: There were stuff that need to changed on LX100; sviwel screen, built-in flash, lack of mic input, lack of underwater housing, limited frame option at 4K... they ignored all those and changed the sensor.

And rised the price.

No! they made even worse: severe crop in 4K video.

Link | Posted on Aug 22, 2018 at 19:42 UTC
On article Panasonic DC-LX100 II Review (1123 comments in total)

I was happy to see they left the design untouched, only adding touchscreen and new sensor. But when I saw this huge crop in 4K video I was totally dissapointed. They managed to make it worse after 4 years.

Link | Posted on Aug 22, 2018 at 19:41 UTC as 208th comment
Total: 319, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »