nixonluminix

Joined on Nov 15, 2019

Comments

Total: 13, showing: 1 – 13

in b4 "YeAh bUt tHe R5 8K iS hIgHeR rEsoLutIoN"

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2021 at 06:43 UTC as 35th comment
In reply to:

Ruy Penalva: No viewfinder!!!

No *feature that isn't essential on a video body* !!!!! Big mad >:(

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2021 at 06:39 UTC
On article Olympus announce xD Picture Card (1 comment in total)

oof

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2021 at 06:13 UTC as 1st comment
On article Olympus C2500-L Mini-review and Samples (3 comments in total)

Still a better camera and better value than the EOS R5 ngl

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2021 at 06:12 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

Brian Mosley: Awesome! Go Alice 👏❤️👍

bet Ronald is fun at parties

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2021 at 05:20 UTC
On article Sony a1 review (2564 comments in total)
In reply to:

WCarpt: No GPS? It's a very useful feature for me.

All g man, told sony, they're gonna put it in specifically for ya c:

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2021 at 05:02 UTC
In reply to:

(unknown member): Ugliest product of the year award for sure. Sony is famous for worst in class ergonomics and instead of doing something about it they just keep copying it and copying it. Lmao. Hope their crap build quality has improved at least.

Yeah I can just really FEEL how bad these pesky ergo bois are by looking at the two images

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2021 at 03:42 UTC
In reply to:

Botifarro: :
Im sorry but what is the point of this? To hog your phone just to use it's screen and network capabilities and actually not take ANY advange of the phone's native computational imaging hardware? I mean, really? If the makers of this "camera" are so deep into it's technological advancements, they can't simply slab a touchscreen on the.back and give it WiFi? Come on..

And then, all of this to using an already xx years-old microscopic M34 sensor and with a lower resolution than ALL THE PHONES ON THE MARKET? ..and I mean really, A L L phones! Come on, again..

And this (if no delays or mishaps) for an end of 2021 release, meaning actually mass shipping sometime next year? One year in this industry is immense & this will be outdated start to finish & top to bottom by the time it reaches anyone's hands. Come on, yet again..

I commend any efforts on pushing out new technologies,. bold forward thinking products & courageous new designs, but all this makes absolutely no sense, zero.

Boti mate, I own a Gh5s and an S21, can definitely say without a doubt the Gh5 resolves higher - even with some sh@tty glass on it lmao.

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2021 at 22:46 UTC
In reply to:

Botifarro: :
Im sorry but what is the point of this? To hog your phone just to use it's screen and network capabilities and actually not take ANY advange of the phone's native computational imaging hardware? I mean, really? If the makers of this "camera" are so deep into it's technological advancements, they can't simply slab a touchscreen on the.back and give it WiFi? Come on..

And then, all of this to using an already xx years-old microscopic M34 sensor and with a lower resolution than ALL THE PHONES ON THE MARKET? ..and I mean really, A L L phones! Come on, again..

And this (if no delays or mishaps) for an end of 2021 release, meaning actually mass shipping sometime next year? One year in this industry is immense & this will be outdated start to finish & top to bottom by the time it reaches anyone's hands. Come on, yet again..

I commend any efforts on pushing out new technologies,. bold forward thinking products & courageous new designs, but all this makes absolutely no sense, zero.

"And then, all of this to using an already xx years-old microscopic M34 sensor and with a lower resolution than ALL THE PHONES ON THE MARKET? ..and I mean really, A L L phones! Come on, again.."

https://youtu.be/9pkY8e73of8?t=16

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2021 at 02:32 UTC

Cries in EOS R5

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2021 at 22:57 UTC as 147th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

D logH: I am very torn over this. On one hand it is a celebration of great photojournalism. These photographers deserve the recognition. The issues this work represent are very important. I am happy for any venue that promotes this work.

On the other hand, this great work has simply become a vehicle to sell a product and brand. This work is just an advertising pitch to get people to buy a camera. There is no real context to the imagery beyond being striking.

Now, this is not new. Camera companies have been doing this for a very long time. But the state of photojournalism was also much better. It was seen and valued for the stories it was telling. And people could make a legitimate career out of it. Today, photojournalism is being increasingly marginalized. This simply represents the increasing commercialization of the craft.

This is all very sad.

That's definitely one way of looking at it. I think the positive in this situation is more cameras will reach more people through marketing - resulting in more photographers covering these issues and producing great work. Have a nice day :)

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2021 at 04:14 UTC
In reply to:

20thCentury: Absolutely fantastic!
Best minute I've spent in a while!

Those darn M-TV hooligans and their fast-paced choppy chops >:(

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2021 at 04:12 UTC
In reply to:

Zvonimir Tosic: Utterly boring news and a waste of time. What is next, DPR?

"A DPR editor drove last week and saw a 1960 Alfa Romeo Spider on the road ... whoa! Unbelievable, that one needs old, low-octane fuel not sold anymore .. this one must have had the engine rebuilt or ignition adjusted to counteract the change in combustion rate. And he took an epic snap of it."

This is exactly what's been "reported" in this "old camera article news".

Maybe just don't read then?

Link | Posted on Nov 15, 2019 at 03:06 UTC
Total: 13, showing: 1 – 13