Indulis Bernsteins

Lives in Australia Australia
Joined on Jul 9, 2006


Total: 43, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

"Limited Edition" makes me think of those ads on the back of TV magazines "Set of genuine Art Series plates- Pirates with icecreams. Hand painted heirloom quality porcelain. Get one of these numbered, limited edition collectors sets now!"

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 21:42 UTC as 9th comment

These 3rd party flash manufacturers are crazy. They try to compete with Canon and Nikon, and maybe get a very small share of a big market. Why don't they start with Fujifilm and the other camera makers who DON'T already have a good selection of flashes, triggers etc. They would get almost 100% of the market, quickly. Then they could move on to Canon and Nikon.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2016 at 15:15 UTC as 12th comment | 6 replies
On article Lily Camera flies itself and follows its owner (155 comments in total)

Not the only one...

Link | Posted on May 23, 2015 at 15:41 UTC as 7th comment | 3 replies

I think the ETTR "rule" should be changed slightly... my change in uppercase

"ETTR. In the most simple terms, it means using the brightest exposure you can possibly get away with, without information YOU CARE ABOUT clipping to white."

For example, I took a closeup photo of someone's face, with a bright background. I actually wanted the background to clip and become white.

Link | Posted on May 23, 2015 at 15:38 UTC as 14th comment
In reply to:

GaryJP: They might be assuring us they are going to keep Lightroom as a standalone product, but it is a nightmare to get through their site without being signed up to a Creative Cloud you don't want. They are just pushing the standalone right to the periphery.

Liars. As we always knew.

If Adobe wanted to stick to the letter of their statement that "there will always be a standalone LR" then they can release future LR versions with no new features, just a new version number (and camera model support). I would not trust the future actions of a company based on a pr statement today.

There are enough big holes in the meant-to-be-reassuring statement, that it isn't.

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 10:33 UTC
On article Interview: Canon's Chuck Westfall on the new XC10 (352 comments in total)

"Too expensive to do RAW mode"- what a big fat lie. Every camera produces raw data. It is doing additional processing like jpeg that takes time and effort. Of course the real reason for no raw is that Canon want you to buy a separate camera for stills, so make sure they "cripple" the features in the camera. A lot of Canon cameras with "missing" features had their firmware examined and modified to enable the features and software that was already there.

In other words, Canon spent money removing features.

This Canonization started with the 300D. Good to know the feature removal division still has jobs!

Made me stop reading, who knows what other bs is there.

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 09:44 UTC as 40th comment

Kudos to Fujifilm for admitting and concentrating on the shortcomings of their cameras. This is a great advance from the earlier "there is no problem!" culture. I hope it is a company wide attitude! So well done, and it is very much appreciated by your customers.

I would add two more things- ergonomics of the cameras and lenses... we don't want aperture rings that move when brushed against lighty. We also don't need camera knobs with locks on them so we can't move them easily.

Just get the amount of "click" and tension correct. The ergonomics of an early 1980s Pentax SLR and it lenses are an ideal to be strived for! Buy an old Pentax SLR for your development team to feel and use and compare against.

Also, go into partnership with a dedicated flash manufacturer, you can't do this as well as they can, and flash is a major hole in the camera product line.

Link | Posted on Mar 9, 2015 at 01:07 UTC as 7th comment
In reply to:

neatnclean: the article is totally misguided.

EOS M system and the EF-M lenses are positioned exactly where they should be:
* decent APS-C image quality
* smallest possible size
* low street price

I got all 4 EF-M lenses, I like them all. I would not have purchased if they were any larger, heavier or more expensive. there is oly one more native EF-M lens I'd consider - an EF-M 75/2.4 ultracompact, sharp and cheap portrait "pancake" at 199.

For everything else else - macro, tilt-shift, longer tele, wide aperture, f/2.8 zooms I use the EF-S and EF lenses I already got.

I let those Fuji X-retro buyers and all those camera-as-a-fashion-statement happily buy 56/1.2 lenses at € 1250 a piece - only to find out they work on APS-C only and must discarded, if Fuji ever manages to bring a full frame sensored camera.

I'd also never trade my EF-M glass for mediocre Sony E lenses or those expensive Zeiss-badged f/4 failures.

Hey- you mean just like the "sucker" Canon EF-S lens buyers will need to throw away their expensive EF-S lenses?

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2015 at 15:45 UTC

The "not wanting to cannibalize its own market" is the result of corporate "silo mentality" where the company tries to make each division its own little profit centre (e.g. DSLR division vs mirrorless division). What you end up with is less focus and effort on what customers want, and more focus on internal squabbling and infighting (and backstabbing) to stop another division's good product being released and biting into your division's mediocre or aging product. A sign of weak and lazy management at the top- and the reason why smaller "single product" focus companies continue to advance the state of the art..

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2015 at 15:41 UTC as 17th comment | 2 replies

3 things which Fujifilm need to fix

Flash support: work with 3rd party flash vendors to get some products out there to match what is available for Canon and Nikon SLRs. It is clear that flashes are not Fujifilm's area of specialty, so forget about "not invented here" and "can't share information", learn from market successes like the IBM PC and Linux: share information = grow your market

Autofocus: the X range of bodies and lenses might be the camera equivalent of the "best running shoes on the planet" but the awful and inconsistent autofocus is like a stone in the shoe. Eventually the runner will get tired of the pain and take off the shoes.

Lens design: include end users early in the design process. Continuing flaws in the lenses are aperture rings that are not firm enough & change by brushing them lightly), and zoom lenses with no capability to put a lens ring with tripod mount onto the lens. Some simple design changes could make a big difference. Another "stone in the shoe".

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2015 at 12:05 UTC as 5th comment

A bunch of Italian designers are laughing into their champagnes... they were employed for a year or two and swanned about doing pretty much nothing, partying and living it up. Then the day before the design deadline, it was a "frantic" 1 hour session to decide to go with either a marble column handgrip, or a wooden handgrip, and what colour the "H" sticker should be.

Link | Posted on Nov 12, 2014 at 14:17 UTC as 47th comment
On article Accessory Review: Drobo Mini RAID (149 comments in total)
In reply to:

hzmeyer: Sorry, but Drobo is not idiot proof. I had one for several years. It had 3 HDs and I thought my photos were totally protected. One day I wanted to format a travel drive and casually placed the cursor on that drive- I thought. It actually was in between that travel drive and Drobo in MY COMPUTER and, as you might guess, it chose Drobo. I clicked FORMAT and years of photos were gone in an instant. You might say to always have several backups. Well, I thought I did- 3 to be exact.

Exactly right Michael! The same as the world's best RAID storage system won't stop a water pipe bursting and destroying all the electronics in your room. So you need an *OFFSITE* backup as well as 2 "active" copies of your data to prevent operator error (that's us, folks!) from destroying your data!
PS even large companies are not immune to the "all my eggs are in one basket" syndrome
PPS anyone using RAID should know that it is designed to cope with TOTAL DRIVE FAILURE, if you get some other errors like a "lost write" then single parity RAID can't recover from these.

Link | Posted on Aug 18, 2014 at 18:20 UTC
On article Hands on with the Pentax 645Z (707 comments in total)
In reply to:

TFD: 37,000 vs 8500 is not a order of magnitude

2 binary orders of magnitude!

Link | Posted on May 18, 2014 at 23:29 UTC
On article Lytro announces Illum light field camera (349 comments in total)

It reminds me of the "e-book readers will empower users to create their own comments and paths through books". But no, the users wanted books to read. I think the technology in this camera is similar, it is OK to play with but people sometimes want to be passive passengers. The best use for it is probably advertising, so a single frame can be used to create multiple perspectives and a journey through the image. Sort of "bullet-time lite".

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2014 at 21:54 UTC as 45th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

plevyadophy: This is a stupid move for a medium format cam maker. Whilst CMOS sensors offer higher ISO settings, CCD sensors are BY FAR superior in image quality at low to moderate ISO settings and medium format should be about quality and NOT bragging rights on a spec sheet.

Hassy would have been better employed commissioning Sony to use their talents to design an improved CCD sensor.

First Hassy buy discontinued Sony cams and pimp them up and sell them at silly prices and now this CMOS thing. It's really sad to see what Hassy is becoming .................. a shadow of its former self.

I hope Phase One ignore this spec sheet CMOS bragging rights nonsense and stick to CCD sensors

It is also about manufacturability of the sensor, the cost-per-unit-of-quality (however that gets measured by a particular market!). So a higher yield CMOS may allow some more $ left over for processing, or better body, or.....

And other engineering targets and tradeoffs.

So it may be that to get fast writes to work, or to enable parallel threaded access to the sensor (to speed up image acquisition and processing). Who knows. You and I don't. So all my speculation is just like everyone else's. The designers have made a choice for (likely) very good reasons.

Unless they are using the "wooden grip" dudes!

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2014 at 15:27 UTC
In reply to:

rad00p: The only good news here is that maybe old grips start to appear on ebay for some reasonable price. Like £20 which they are worth.

Thank you Fuji for charging us so much for sometime that should be included for free.

Stop complaining, Canon would have sold you the X series lenses without lens hoods and charged 1/4 the price of the lens for one.

PS in reality I agree that it seems a *little* expensive, but you can always wait for a sale.

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2014 at 11:18 UTC
In reply to:

photo nuts: It's funny that customers need to fork out extra cash for manufacturers' mistakes.

JD- there should be an appropriate, internationally recognised emoticon for "I am being sarcastic" (at a pinch it could also be used for when you are being ironic too).

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2014 at 11:13 UTC
In reply to:

jwalker019: I think it's great they're finally releasing an upgraded grip, but why would they not just have designed the camera properly in the first place?

Even more importantly, why doesn't the body have *any* sort of grip protrusion as standard?

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2014 at 11:11 UTC
In reply to:

PinPoint: wow, a dumb rubber cost around 20% the price of a camera body with sophisticated electronics and mechanics... I changed all the 4 tyres of my car and that cost me around 2% the price of car body...

Look up the Oxford English (yes English) dictionary, and remember that the web extends beyond the USA ;-)

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2014 at 11:10 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF 14mm F2.8 R review (6 comments in total)

If there is one thing that anmnoys me with Fujifilm lenses it is the sloppy aperture clicks, which make it too easy to bump out of your setting. It would be an easy thing to fix, but each new lens has the same problem.

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2013 at 11:22 UTC as 4th comment
Total: 43, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »