fivetonsflax

I am, reluctantly, convinced. I will experiment with these test images. Thank you for your advice.

Ah. Thanks.

So that should already be the "good" one? Thanks,

Seiko

Now that is a fascinating bit of intel. My profile was supplied with the printer driver and is labeled "SC-P600 Series Premium Luster". If you have a line on a better vendor profile for Epson ...

I hear you. For now, the plan is to print test targets and mail them to someone who will make me a custom profile for a fee. The only hitch is, that doesn't do me any good for ABW.

I am using the Epson profile. I don't see a big difference between using a reference image someone else took, and one I took. The value of using the images I'm using is, I have printed them before, ...

Thanks for your thoughts, Keith. I understand the advice to use reference images. I may try that in the future. For now, I've been comparing new prints to prints made with identical settings and ...

Yes, I'm sure. Lightroom. The results are not *terrible* — I am just picky. Thanks,

Thank you, Howard.

Thanks. I'm using Epson paper (premium lustre, FWIW), so I have the Epson-provided profile. The problem is, it's not giving me the results I want and expect.

I just switched from an Epson R2400 to a P600. Comparing new to old prints, the new ones are cooler (which seems to be partly due to the paper yellowing over time), and have too-bright, harsh ...