photolando

Lives in United States Orlando, United States
Works as a Professional Photographer
Joined on Jul 29, 2001
About me:

Portrait and Corporate Event Photographer since 1986.

Comments

Total: 40, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Spectro: This would be good if they are making ""style panel be set up within the Copyright office"" this would be much easier. I am guessing this would cross state line (federal) and maybe countries?

For now you can still take your issues to small claim court (see your state):
""Any individual, business, partnership, or corporation (with a couple of exceptions) may bring a small claims suit for recovery of money only for an amount up to $5,000."" -WA State Courts

But if they are out of state or country that makes it much more difficult in our current small claim court.
"In general, the claim must be filed in the district court of the county in which the defendant(s) reside"" -WA state courts

So this new court or system would be on the federal level not just the state small claim court.

Bobthearch. Yeah, we all know that. Why do you think they formed this? So you don't have to go the federal case route. Try to keep up will ya.

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2017 at 14:16 UTC
In reply to:

AlanG: So you get an assignment from an ad agency and shoot it on Ektachrome. You send the slides to the AD and she calls you and says "What the heck is this?"

They are only going to scan the one(s) they use. We use to just lay them out out a light table and pick the best ones. We were drum scanning the chromes used in the ads in the late 80s so it's nothing new.

BUT, I'm still not sure why anyone wants to shoot Ektachrome. B&W film I can see. It's still an art form with development and darkroom techniques and prints and all. But Ektachrome? Ok. We'll see.

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2017 at 13:40 UTC
In reply to:

photolando: Ok. Fun little shoot. Now, and I say this as a portrait photographer, pick a "normal, everyday person", not a young pretty professional model who knows how to pose and look good. If your a "portrait" photographer, you work with people who have no idea what to do, what to wear, overweight, average looks, etc. It's really hard to take a bad pic of a pretty pro model. Even if the lighting is bad.

I look at all their linked images and all I see is young pretty faces. Now take a look at Karsh, Penn or Mary Ellen Mark, and many others. Real people. Some famous, but not models. Older. Interesting. Portraits that say something about that person. Sorry. These are more fashion/glamour images than they are "portraits". And that's fine. But call it what it is.

I may have jumped the gun. It does say "4 portrait photographers shoot the same model". I may have read into it "4 photographers create a portrait of the same subject." I guess when I read "portrait" photographers I though I was going to see more regular type of portraits. Still, I would have like to have seen them use just a normal everyday person. One a typical portrait shooter would be hired to shoot.

Link | Posted on Aug 18, 2017 at 17:24 UTC

Ok. Fun little shoot. Now, and I say this as a portrait photographer, pick a "normal, everyday person", not a young pretty professional model who knows how to pose and look good. If your a "portrait" photographer, you work with people who have no idea what to do, what to wear, overweight, average looks, etc. It's really hard to take a bad pic of a pretty pro model. Even if the lighting is bad.

I look at all their linked images and all I see is young pretty faces. Now take a look at Karsh, Penn or Mary Ellen Mark, and many others. Real people. Some famous, but not models. Older. Interesting. Portraits that say something about that person. Sorry. These are more fashion/glamour images than they are "portraits". And that's fine. But call it what it is.

Link | Posted on Aug 18, 2017 at 13:57 UTC as 37th comment | 9 replies
In reply to:

photolando: My god, Is this really what a "photographer" wants? Sorry, but you are no longer a photographer when you have so much automation going on, AI? Really" How about just using UR-I. Or "YOUR EYE". Don't use your camera as a computer. Use it as a machine that YOU manually control everything. YES! Figure out the best exposure. Best lens. Best shutter speed/aperture. THAT IS THE ART OF PHOTOGRAPHY!!!! This is just ridiculous.
This is equal to a putting a brush in a robot's hand and letting it paint the painting while you sit back and relax.

Yep. Pretty much. I mean, how can you sit back and say "I took that shot" when in reality, all you did was push the shutter release? Or does this thing anticipate the "defining moment" and take the shot as well? Whats the point of taking up the hobby or profession of photography if your not going to be involved in the process??

Link | Posted on May 26, 2017 at 13:31 UTC

My god, Is this really what a "photographer" wants? Sorry, but you are no longer a photographer when you have so much automation going on, AI? Really" How about just using UR-I. Or "YOUR EYE". Don't use your camera as a computer. Use it as a machine that YOU manually control everything. YES! Figure out the best exposure. Best lens. Best shutter speed/aperture. THAT IS THE ART OF PHOTOGRAPHY!!!! This is just ridiculous.
This is equal to a putting a brush in a robot's hand and letting it paint the painting while you sit back and relax.

Link | Posted on May 26, 2017 at 13:13 UTC as 63rd comment | 6 replies

Magazine? People still read those things? :)

Link | Posted on Dec 29, 2016 at 00:02 UTC as 236th comment
On article Google Pixel XL camera review (199 comments in total)
In reply to:

aljudy: DPReveiw readers: this is what's killing the regular camera market. This continual improvement of the "low end" media market is showing no signs of slowing down. No wonder the movement to bigger sensors. DPReview: Is it time to do reviews comparing these phone cameras with low-end regular cameras? I think this type of comparative review would help your readers and those who become disappointed with their phones.

It only disappoints photographers. The average person couldn't care less. It's going no further THAN their, or someone else's phone. As long is it looks good on their phone, they are happy.

I don't say this in support of them. I'm a pro and have to put up with people taking the same shot I am at an event. Or I do a group shot then someone hands me their phone. Even if they are getting my shots for free. They don't care. They want it now.

Link | Posted on Dec 21, 2016 at 21:03 UTC

Well, according to B&H it's only about $45 more than the Nissan i40. From the dimensions it is a bit beefier. I always feel like the i40 looks so "toyish" on my X-T1. This Metz isn't a lot bigger (1/4" wider) but looks a little more professional. Not that I really care what people think but doing corporate events I want them, the clients, to think I'm using professional equipment. The attendees don't care but the client might. Perception does play a factor. I'll pick one up and give it a shot. Pun intended.

Link | Posted on Dec 6, 2016 at 15:31 UTC as 6th comment | 1 reply
On article Ultimate OM-D: Olympus E-M1 Mark II Review (1397 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sean65: I like Olympus and what they do but like Sony, Fuji and others I'm not sure they'll ever make it on to the league of professional cameras and I wonder how long they'll continue to chase the dream.

As a professional, I care. Even though I make my own decisions, pros have always looked for anything that might improve either the quality of their images, the ease of taking them, new technologies, etc. Anyone on this website cares a little or you wouldn't be here to begin with.

I've always been curious as to "why" other professionals use the camera they use. Doesn't mean I will buy it but I want to know their opinion. I meet a lot of people at corporate events who are into photography. They are always asking me questions about my camera, the lens I use, flash, etc. Sites like this give me a little more knowledge of ALL the cameras out there and what they can to cannot do. As one company adds something new, the others follow or make it better. Or they drop it. But they all watch each other and we win in the long run.

Link | Posted on Nov 24, 2016 at 12:10 UTC
On article Ultimate OM-D: Olympus E-M1 Mark II Review (1397 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sean65: I like Olympus and what they do but like Sony, Fuji and others I'm not sure they'll ever make it on to the league of professional cameras and I wonder how long they'll continue to chase the dream.

Actually, I'm not sure Canon or Nikon will ever wake up and realize this is where professional photography is headed. Trust me, plenty of professionals are getting into mirrorless. My X-T1 produces some of the best skin tones on my headshots that I have ever seen. Blows away similar shots with my 6D. I use both at corporate events. But I can see dumping the heavy gear soon.

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2016 at 16:52 UTC

Why third party companies aren't making flashes for Fuji cameras is beyond me. They need more choices for external flashes. Sony makes speed lights. So do a lot of other companies for Sony, but not many for Fuji. If I were them, I get some out there. If good, Fuji buyers would buy them in a heartbeat. I would.

Link | Posted on Nov 22, 2016 at 20:10 UTC as 18th comment | 4 replies
On article Field Test: Wedding Photography with the Fujifilm X-T2 (233 comments in total)
In reply to:

elefteriadis alexandros: One of the most important aspects in Wedding and professional photography is the perspective and depth of field control, and for a serious photographer anything smaller than medium format is not acceptable for that reason. Smaller formats is only for sports and speed situations.
Of Course young people they don't understand that because they didn't have the opportunity to compare small format with big one.

I take it you are very young because before digital dslrs, you were a hack if you didn't shoot a weeding with MF. No professional used a film slr back in the day. Most used Hasselblad. The serious and best ones anyway.

Link | Posted on Nov 12, 2016 at 13:11 UTC
On article Field Test: Wedding Photography with the Fujifilm X-T2 (233 comments in total)
In reply to:

desaint: Sorry have nothing to do with the pics...but why he is wearing that cap(backwards) on a wedding...looks totally out of place..
Great colors by the way.

I have to agree. I realize it's a very casual affair, but even still, I see so many photographers, especially wedding/event photographers that dress very sloppy. Videographers are even worse. I see them all the time at "corporate" events in jeans and t-shirts. A polo or button down, nice pants, and at least nice looking casual shoes is the least anyone should wear to a clients event. But NEVER a baseball cap. How tacky. On a golf course shooting foursomes? Maybe. A wedding? Really?

Link | Posted on Nov 9, 2016 at 14:00 UTC
On photo Street Food in the Your City - Local Street Vendor challenge (9 comments in total)
In reply to:

calson: The composition with the man in the left side of the frame and the outstretched arm going to the highlighted corn works very well. What detracts from the picture is the busy background that competes with the viewer's eyes.

This is the kind of scene that needs to be worked with different angles and heights and apertures and focal lengths and shifting to change the background. It also shows why a 35mm focal length is a bad choice for street photography with its excessive depth of field and limitations for excluding detracting/distracting elements.

This is a great shot. People need to understand, when your trying to catch a moment, you don't always have a second chance to move and try another angle. This work BECAUSE of the angle. The profile and lighting on his face. Wonderful. The steam from the corn. It all works. The people in the background do not distract from the subject, They ARE the background. It's a street shoot. It should have people. I shoot corporate events full time and I can tell you, sometimes you have ONE chance at a good shot. You nailed this one. A great capture does NOT have to be technically perfect. Notice I didn't say anything about the technical part. I don't care. It's a great capture.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2016 at 11:04 UTC
In reply to:

Iamnotarobot: I guess there is nothing really special about his cameras because most of his creativity came out of his extensive/obsessive darkroom work. It could be said that he was the father of photoshop with his obsessive level of selective dodge & burn & image post alteration/manipulation...

I would't agree. He had to decide what lens, what aperture, shutter speed, bellows extension, time of day, etc. His books started with The Camera, then The Negative THEN The Print. All were equally important when using the Zone System.

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2016 at 18:49 UTC
In reply to:

PanchoVilla: Look huge and ugly! This makes FF look like M43 sized cameras and lenses!

My original comment was meant to say that people need to get over this whole FF thing. All I hear is, "If only it were FF". Full Frame means nothing. Absolutely nothing, It's all just a size of a chip that either gives you the quality and image size YOU want, or it doesn't. Having shot everything from a Minox to a Sinar 8x10 over the past 30 years as a full time pro, trust me, I'm fully aware of the term Full Frame. It's just that the terms Full Frame or Crop sensor really don't mean much. It's just a format "size". Period. Except to tech heads. Has nothing to do with me getting over myself. NOBODY called a Mamiya 645 a "cropped" 2 1/4. But compared to a Hasselblad, it was. Or an RB67. Heck, a Hasselblad was a "cropped" RB67. Yet no one used the terms back then. They were just what they were, larger of smaller formats.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2016 at 13:41 UTC

If it does as it says, this will be in every pros bag. We do still use meters. It does ambient, flash AND color? $229? That's a steal. I'm still a bit skeptical. We will see. I actually hope it performs as it says it will.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 19:36 UTC as 13th comment
On article Metz mecablitz M400 flash unveiled at Photokina (44 comments in total)
In reply to:

photolando: 4 "AAA" batteries? Really Metz? Most of us are already well vested in AAs. I don't want to have to carry and keep up with two sizes all the time. Your a great flash company but if Nissan could fit 4 AA's, you could have as well. This will not be a big seller because of the AAA battery size I feel. And if it performs no better than the Nissan (and MAN they look so much alike. Hmm), most will go with the Nissan.

Guess someone at Metz needs to proof read their press releases.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 18:01 UTC
In reply to:

PanchoVilla: Look huge and ugly! This makes FF look like M43 sized cameras and lenses!

Didn't know you, RPJG were the DPReview Police telling what others can say and not say. I don't agree with others and respond and this is your intelligent comeback? Either say something that contributes or don't respond at all. At least I am on topic. People get all up on the FF argument. It's a non issue. FF does not matter and means basically nothing in todays world. All we have is FORMAT. It either works for YOU or it doesn't,

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 12:16 UTC
Total: 40, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »