N13L5

Joined on Sep 12, 2011

Comments

Total: 233, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Kharan: Speaking of respect and proper addressing: it's mister Tokura, with an "o". There's two instances of "Takura" on the last paragraphs.

Other than that, fairly useless interview. I'd much rather hear from the people at Fuji or Sigma, who actually try to honestly answer questions. This cat-and-mouse game that some senior executives play might be extremely Japanese, but it never ceases to disappoint me.

The way he talks,
he might as well be management drone #2345890

His name and its spelling is as arbitrary as his evasive double speak.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 18:27 UTC
In reply to:

Everlast66: I just read one question/answer and didn't need to read more.

Q:
"Some of our readers were disappointed that the 80D does not include 4K video. Why did you decide not to include this feature?"

A:
"As you know, in our DSLR lineup we incorporate both video functions and traditional stills DSLR functions."

Man, what a start, is this guy retarded? Of course the interviewer knows, he just asked why there is no 4K ?

"We’re promoting our DSLRs as providing both stills and video features - the best of both worlds, you might say."

Or maybe not!? He was just told that people are DISAPPOINTED that the D80, that's not even shipped yet, is missing a feature, that's been available in competing products for a while.
Then with the last sentence he admits what they've done.

"Then, with the aim of increasing the user base, we add movie features to this established stills shooting feature set."

Basically, more of the same, we're safe for the next 5 years. This guy is in denial of whats happening.

Bean counter talk.
Afraid of shareholders, if he messes up the balance sheet with engineering bills.

He'd rather his company slowly die than having to stand up and face his seniors / superiors...

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 18:21 UTC
In reply to:

tnj86: I only want a mirrorless camera from canon if it's EF mount. Tokura is right, lenses are one of the big reasons canon still has customers.

All I want from Canon is an ironically retro looking 5DsR, EF Mount, with a Hybrid EVF, a tilt-able LCD, 4k, and a little dynamic range improvement.

Then they can have all my money.

Yes, EF mount would make the camera deeper, but also keep the lenses shorter! So really, you're not gaining or loosing anything.

Canon could just make fat cameras that are more compact in other dimensions. Fat is nice for holding it. They could just reduce height instead and things would be dandy!

Not every camera needs to be a flat slab like the A7 series.

Think of an a6300 that's 1.5 times as thick: awesome handle, more space for battery and EF lenses fitting perfectly. Big top plate with enough room for dials / LCD display.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 07:22 UTC
In reply to:

PhotoDiod: Speaking of respect, I get a feeling that Mr Tokura has little respect for what we call 'enthusiast' market, choosing to steer conversation to professional equipment and requirements.

I am not a pro, but I do want to be able to fly a larger than 1" sensor on a pistol grip gimbal while shooting 120fps HD for slow motion. Because it is 2016. With Canon, I can't.

Why do I want Mr Tokura to give me an idea if this is going to happen any time soon? Because I have invested thousands of dollars and my trust in his brand and its promise of customer dedication. Too much to ask?

Bean counters only have respect for balance sheets.

Customers are just a cog in the machine.

You can always tell if a company is dominated by bean counters or engineers. And every company starts and gets big while engineers are running it. Then comes the mature phase where bean counters take over and optimize profits from stagnant sales. If engineers don't return once sales on outmoded products start a lengthy decline, the bean counter's will eventually kill the company, with nothing left to do but sell off the pieces.

Well if they're really good fraudsters, they'll get a series of government bailouts first.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 07:16 UTC
In reply to:

ProfHankD: Did Canon say something? Nope.

The "read between the lines" is that Canon can't figure-out how to make really new products while keeping their very cost-effective standard guts in them. Sadly for them, they no longer have the infrastructure to compete with engineering-intensive companies like Sony.

My suggestion to Canon is to embrace the main sources of their innovation over the last decade: CHDK and ML. If Canon can't afford to do the research and development, especially in software/firmware, there are people in the open source world who can and are willing to, including academics like me. All Canon has to do is decide to support rather than ignore/frustrate these efforts....

Sony kinda took a sledgehammer to that EF glass lock-in.

As for infrastructure - I think they just don't want to spend money and make their balance sheet look any uglier with declining sales.

But hiring engineers to defend their business is the only way to avoid a long, slow decline, which will tarnish their brand.

I think nobody in Management has the guts to explain it to shareholders, even if its already obvious to every last one of them.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 07:10 UTC
In reply to:

Tonkotsu Ramen: Is it Takura or Tokura?

At least get that detail correct.

Shouldn't matter, he'll be gone with the next set of redundancies induced by declining sales.

Failure to hire enough engineers to defend the company's main business it'll say in his recommendation letter - carefully and incomprehensibly worded of course.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 07:02 UTC
In reply to:

Glenn Barber: The elephant in the room is the lack of the engineering skills in-house to build a high res sensor with high dynamic range that can be read out and into memory quickly and can be used with 4k video. They had the resolution in the 5Ds but not the DR and it is way too slow for general professional use. They have great lens and camera building skills, and fantastic service - if they could swallow some pride and use sony sensors they could certainly be on top of the heap - as it is they are starting to fall behind Nikon who have already decided to play to their strengths.

How about just spending some money and hiring the engineers they lack to save the company from a long, slow and sad decline?

Not to mention letting Sony get too happy, cause like any one of these miserable corporations, when they feel they're on top, there will be no further advances and certainly no service. Just gauging.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 06:57 UTC

"There are some features, such as AF, which have not yet caught up with DSLRs, so given the current state of affairs it would be a little unrealistic to say that we will suddenly start offering a professional mirrorless camera. There’s still a performance gap that needs to be addressed."

His use of the word "SUDDENLY" is just glorious! Wow, look! There's a glacier coming! So suddenly! Just a thousand years ago, there was nothing! Run!

.

I guess Canon wants to wait till Sony addresses all the issues before they get moving. Too bad about patents and other stuff that could muck up that strategy...

Bean counters at the top and a corporate culture that discourages people to speak up has strangled many a corporation.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 06:52 UTC as 46th comment
On article Opinion: Enthusiast compacts have finally come of age (479 comments in total)
In reply to:

LEGACYMOMENTSPHOTOGRAPHY: It will be great if/when you can pick up a compact 1inch sensor camera for under £200.

I think you can! RX100 or RX100 II

Link | Posted on Feb 29, 2016 at 09:49 UTC
On article Opinion: Enthusiast compacts have finally come of age (479 comments in total)
In reply to:

iudex: I wonder why are compact camera buyers so obsessed with looooong zoom. Once I had a pocketable compact (Canon S100) and despite it had only 120mm at tele end, I was hardly able to get a picture anytime but in bright sunny day because of luminosity f5,9 at tele end. I know a good OIS can do a lot but usability of a camera at 720mm eq. and f6,3 seems very limited to me.
Like many of us I am often asked to advise a camera and the demands are always the same: small, pocketable, with good image quality AND with long zoom. I tend to recommend enthusiast compacts like RX100 et al, but many people reject it because of short zoom. However people who took my advise were very satisfied with the outcome and didn´t regret it (and to their surprise they didn´t miss the huge zoom).

what do you mean, I can't have an F1.4 600mm?

Link | Posted on Feb 29, 2016 at 09:48 UTC
On article Opinion: Enthusiast compacts have finally come of age (479 comments in total)
In reply to:

Andrei L: I really dig the 18mm wide end of the new Nikon. That really is something that has been missing from the compact segment. Just hope the IQ is not much behind RX100 series. Likewise, the "only" 10x new Panasonic TZ with large sensor and F values looks like a good compromise. If only they stopped applying that stupid noise reduction smearing on anything over base ISO. I'd trade that with the new Olympus grainy look any given day.

yeah, but how can they make a landscape / street camera without EVF? You're shooting in bright light and can't see jack sh*t on the screen.

Link | Posted on Feb 29, 2016 at 09:46 UTC
On article Opinion: Enthusiast compacts have finally come of age (479 comments in total)

I don't get the need for a long zoom. Sure, I wouldn't mind if the RX100IV went to ~100 for portraits, but then its bokeh isn't all that pretty anyway.

And sadly, the Nikon DL18-50 excludes itself from my shortlist by lack of a viewfinder. Even though Nikon doesn't use BSI sensors, I would have jumped on that one otherwise.

Now, after all the excitement, I'm back to considering my choices between this summer's RX100m5, an a6300 or an aging A7RII.

I wanted a compact camera to bridge my wait for the A7S III, which would hopefully have a BSI sensor, less rolling shutter and more sophisticated AF.

What to do??

Link | Posted on Feb 29, 2016 at 09:44 UTC as 51st comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

nandbytes: I wonder if the sensor, image and video quality is as good as Sony RX100m4??

Not much matches the BSI sensor, even Sony's cameras mostly don't have it. Just the A7RII and the RX100IV.

Reason I didn't buy the A7SII was its lack of BSI sensor, Sony just left the old one from the A7S in there, and at that, the A7SII can't even match the A7S for light sensitivity according to DxO.

Possible that I wait till June to see what Sony has got for the RX100V :)
I can use that until the A7S m3 or Canon's full frame mirrorless comes out and beyond.
A pocket camera is always useful.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2016 at 14:20 UTC
On article Quick review: Nextbit Robin camera (44 comments in total)
In reply to:

migus: Might be an interesting phone, except one 'feature', i.e., "Cloud storage" to which any serious user should take exception.

" alternative to those who want to access large numbers of photos from their gallery app without shelling out big bucks for a phone with a lot of built-in storage."

Local storage today is plentiful, fast, light and affordable; e.g. a 32GB uSD card costs practically only a few $, not larger/heavier than pocket lint, barely a gram. Also the 128+ GB cards cost a fraction of most data plans. Thus one could carry her personally private 'cloud' about, fast, cheap and secure.

Wanna show my latest shots to a friend met on the street, with voice comments? Presto, at local speed, no data costs!

Yet the local storage has become the anathema of Cloud Inc., the "big data" companies monetizing their users' data. A uSD card is cheaper, lighter, faster than ever... if only a port would exist to use it!

I'd never buy a device w/o local storage ports built-in.

I wish I had even the smallest reason to jump up and say "you're wrong."

But you got it nailed. The only good thing in this nightmare is that every day, more people are waking up to it.

There are a lot more people who are somewhat aware, but resist allowing it to the surface of their minds, cause they know very well it would totally screw up the life they currently either enjoy or at least find tolerable.

Replacing a nagging but nebulous feeling with the sure knowledge of impending doom just isn't fun.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2016 at 14:11 UTC
In reply to:

nandbytes: I wonder if the sensor, image and video quality is as good as Sony RX100m4??

Yeah, I saw that...

But it blocks the hot shoe, makes it hard to pocket and could get lost and costs extra, of course :)

Granted, the RX100IV doesn't have a hot shoe in the first place.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2016 at 13:45 UTC
In reply to:

PhotoPhoolish: I just don't understand all the people who post simply to bash this brand or that brand. If you're truly happy with your Sony, Nikon, Fuji, etc., what do you care what Canon does or does not do to make you happy? You are obviously not their intended audience or buyer. I can only assume people bash for one of these reasons: 1. You're looking for an audience to join you in your crazy behavior (misery loves company); 2. You're looking for a reason to jump ship and leave your brand because of some unhappiness; or 3. You're jealous of the loyalty of Canon users and just can't fathom why they won't leave Canon and buy one of the "obviously superior" cameras made by their competitors.

Meanwhile, you have no basis for ripping any of these new cameras, as none have been tested. I suggest devoting that time you use now for irrational behavior and nonsensical posts to work on your photography skills. We would all be better off! Personally, I think complaining for the sake of complaining is better left to 8 year olds.

Good luck in life haters. Remember, nobody likes a whiner.

@thx1138 don't get so down over the simple fact, that people get to post their opinions right or wrong. Calling them trolls (true or not) no good can come of that either.

What was that old saying: "I despise what you're saying, but I'll fight to the death for your right to say it" (I know I butchered it somewhat)

People have hassled me here, cause I posted a helpful answer to a necro thread a google search had dropped me on... That's just the internet... people on edge, ready to tilt over any moment. Just pour yourself another cup of coffee and tell them off, but don't ever let it spoil your Saturday :)

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2016 at 13:37 UTC

At just 20MP, I'd like a 1D low light monster version, that can compete with the A7S for sensitivity but beats it for AF, rolling shutter and avoids banding issues.

It may be heavier than the Sony, but the lenses are shorter and I think Canon's weather sealing is just better.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2016 at 12:53 UTC as 5th comment
In reply to:

tigerw: When I saw the new Pentax K-1 only offers 1080p@30fps and the new Sigma sd Quattro does not even have video capability, I felt Canon was doing well. But when I saw the new Sony A6300, I put my Canon gears on sale. Being a Canon user for 10+ years, it's time to let them go. That said, I still love Canon lenses and I've decided to keep them for a while. There are people out there who like the Canon "style" when it comes to camera bodies but I can only say for myself I like to try something new.

@ Tigerw
While I do lean towards certain Sony bodies, I don't think all is well with the a6300:
.
- lack of IBIS, preventing it from benefiting from exactly those EF lenses Sony is suggesting to also use on APS-C bodies in their recent communications. almost all EF lenses have no stabilization.
.
- no BSI sensor. Tests will have to show how close the a6300 sensor can come to BSI in regards to low light capability and the speed of moving data off the chip.
.
- the overall changes from the a6000 are kind of minute. Metal body is nice, but weather sealing incomplete, and the strengthened lens mount is mainly useful for all the EF lenses that would need IBIS to have the benefits outweigh the drawbacks of using full frame lenses on a crop sensor.
.
Yes, there is a stabilized full frame GM superzoom being introduced by Sony, but it costs twice as much as an A7R II plus a whole set of lenses, including the non-stabilized version of the same zoom lens.

Lots of trap doors with Sony. Watch out

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2016 at 02:56 UTC
In reply to:

Tonkotsu Ramen: Can you comment a bit more on the speed of the G7 X Mark II?

How is the:

Initial AF acquisition time

Shot to shot speed with review on

Shot to shot speed with review off

Time to clear buffer after filling with jpg+raw

Overall operational speed vs G7 X and Nikon J4/V3/DL?

Thank You

That would be useful to know, amid all the feeble minded statements that Canon/Nikon/Whatever is "the best".

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2016 at 02:13 UTC
Total: 233, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »