CyeJoeBob

Tamrac Pro Compact 1

Tamrac Pro Compact 1 is my favorite, but will likely not fit the viewfinder.

Honestly, GR II has the better lens or at least the less demanding sensor. The GR III looks good, but doesn't have this breathtaking corner to corner sharpness of the GR II.
I would really like to...

@Carey

Tried the 28mm f2 against the Sigma 30mm 1.4 on the A6300 and it was just bad. Worst corner sharpness and worst CA I have seen for a long time. The Sony 28mm is not even close to the Sigma...

Is your AF is set to [High speed]? If it is set to [High Speed] the display turns of during focusing and that looks like the display is lagging (User manual p. 57).

Left - JPEG, Right - RAW It's clearer when you just develope some RAW by yourself. Lightroom gave me the best results so far. By the way,yYou can use every LR version, because the RAW's are DNG format.

Yes, I mean the GR I and II camera in gerneral. 100% 100%

The Ricoh JPEG's are pretty bad in terms of detail rendering and sharpness. I think they make this great lens look like average. Just develope some RAW and see the difference.

I developed some RAW and can only say that the GR III is definitly not sharper than the GR I and II, but that is pretty impossible anyway without making the lens bigger. My first impression is that ...

Just developed some RAW and I'm happy that the lens is as good as the old GR's lens, but now with more MP. JPEG's look better too, at least in terms of overall detail rendering.

This guide shows how poor the lens selection for APS-C E-Mount is.

The Sigma 30mm 1.4 has focus issues in AF-S. Though, AF-C works fine.

I never really used the build-in flash on my Ricoh GR. Most of the time the pictures look awful with this flash. But what I would like to see is a more powerful compact flash that gives me full TTL ...

So... 24MP, touchscreen, IBIS and maybe faster AF. Not so much for 4 years of waiting, but enough to make me want this little gem. I just hope they fixed the dust issues.

The Fuji 18mm f/2 is definitly not better than the GR lens. It's faster, but doesn't come close to the sharpness of the GR lens.

I had sensor dust with my GR II after the first short trip, visible from f/5.6. I used the adapter with UV filter after that. I don't think it's better with the GR II than with GR.

Touch screen, higher resolution sensor and Fn-button instead of the useless filter button on top. All nice things, but also things that I already wanted to see in the LX100 when it was released....

I will buy an A7 III when the price hits the 2000€ mark in europe. I won't accept this ridiculous "Sony-Europe-Pricing". All other manufacturer just change $ to € which represents the VAT which is...

Sorry, typo. I mean: "But I was very dissappointed with the performance of the Sony 28mm f2, which can't get close to the Sigma 30mm f1.4." This has nothing to do with autofocus and the firmware ...

I ordered the Sony 28m f2 to replace the Sigma 30mm f1.4 for my Sony A6300, because the focus problems using the AF-S with the Sigma are kind of annoying. But I was very dissappointed with the ...