CyeJoeBob

This guide shows how poor the lens selection for APS-C E-Mount is.

The Sigma 30mm 1.4 has focus issues in AF-S. Though, AF-C works fine.

I never really used the build-in flash on my Ricoh GR. Most of the time the pictures look awful with this flash. But what I would like to see is a more powerful compact flash that gives me full TTL ...

So... 24MP, touchscreen, IBIS and maybe faster AF. Not so much for 4 years of waiting, but enough to make me want this little gem. I just hope they fixed the dust issues.

The Fuji 18mm f/2 is definitly not better than the GR lens. It's faster, but doesn't come close to the sharpness of the GR lens.

I had sensor dust with my GR II after the first short trip, visible from f/5.6. I used the adapter with UV filter after that. I don't think it's better with the GR II than with GR.

Touch screen, higher resolution sensor and Fn-button instead of the useless filter button on top. All nice things, but also things that I already wanted to see in the LX100 when it was released....

I will buy an A7 III when the price hits the 2000€ mark in europe. I won't accept this ridiculous "Sony-Europe-Pricing". All other manufacturer just change $ to € which represents the VAT which is...

Sorry, typo. I mean: "But I was very dissappointed with the performance of the Sony 28mm f2, which can't get close to the Sigma 30mm f1.4." This has nothing to do with autofocus and the firmware ...

I ordered the Sony 28m f2 to replace the Sigma 30mm f1.4 for my Sony A6300, because the focus problems using the AF-S with the Sigma are kind of annoying. But I was very dissappointed with the ...

I suggest testing the lenses outside in the real world. A bookshelf at short distance is not perfect to test the corner sharpness at f/2.

No, that's not possible. Only about 3mm left with the lenshood in reverse position.

A lot of wasted space. You basically get a pretty big backpack with the space of a small one.

Can the Sony A6300 save the manual focus setting? If I turn the camera off, the focus is a resetted to infinity. Is there any setting to avoid that?

Yeah, that's the reason I'm a bit confused. I bought a used Sigma 16mm in mint condition on Ebay now. And unsurprisingly it has exactly the same focus problems. The problems are not just similar, ...

It's clearly visible at the edges, but the centre is often only very slightly out of focus so that you have to look twice, even at 100%. The field curvature seems to make it worse towards the edges. ...

Yeah, but when the focus is about 1cm behind the subject I intend to focus on in 100% of the images... It may not be a backfocus, but it is definitely not how the autofocus works. I tried an A6000 ...

Yes, it's better at 45mm, but I can see the difference between softness and back-focus. I compared AF-S with AF-C and with AF-S it's much better focused. I noticed the problem while trying to track ...

Redid the test with Steady Shot turned off. And no surprise - same results.

Another full res example. Both focused on the sculpture. With AF-S the sculpture is sharp and the background slightly blurry. With AF-C the background is sharp despite I focused on the sculpture. A ...