Lives in United States AK, United States
Works as a student
Joined on May 6, 2007


Total: 100, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous2345Next ›Last »
On article gets mobile (110 comments in total)
In reply to:

SonyA77: Great mobile site but you need iphone app too..

and Android... ;-)

Link | Posted on Mar 7, 2012 at 22:46 UTC
In reply to:

aerorail: can someone explain to me this apple thing...i don't get it
nevermind it won't make sense no matter what is written

minimal improvements since electronics are having a hard time finding new things that make sense same as phones and tv

QUICK run out and buy one!!

Lol, Canon just realized that more mexapixel isn't needed. But image quality is always welcome!
But you only saw the MP count and where disapointed... tsts.
Best thing ever on the 5D MKIII is the AF! It's killer!

Link | Posted on Mar 7, 2012 at 22:43 UTC
In reply to:

Hughesnet: I got in a preorder for 2 of the 64gb ATT 4G ones. Can't wait for the 16th. Ignore the Android fanboys posting here. This tablet has twice the resolution of theirs, supports usb connection to your camera or a SD card, has iPhoto, has a great built in cam. There is nothing photography related their android tablets can do better.

Well since you mentioned it, can the Ipad control a Dslr like a Canon EOS?
Well the Android Tablets can...
and the USB compatibility is old (old in Android) new in Ipad.
A few years back i had a Archos 101 Internet Tablet with those features.
It also suported my 1TB NTFS formatted HDD. :-)
Yeah, but the screen is WAY better on the Ipad, I have to admit! :-)

Link | Posted on Mar 7, 2012 at 22:27 UTC
In reply to:

Joesiv: Surprised there is no videolight on the new flash.

the 320 EX has video light!

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2012 at 11:25 UTC
On article Lensbaby introduces Edge 80 telephoto optic (19 comments in total)
In reply to:

paul13walnut5: UK price confirmed at £300, which is equivalent to $475.

UK customers are expected to pay £110 or $175 more than US customers.

Boo Hiss Lensbaby! Very greedy.

most of the difference are taxes..

Link | Posted on Feb 25, 2012 at 12:35 UTC
In reply to:

kff: next version would get a special AF bracketing (by moving AF point from the front to back) for fast aperture in the macro composed from several pictures when its are taking from tripod ...

Why have photographers to do it in the a special macro software and with a lot of effort during taking today?
What does Ricoh say:?)

It is need in the Petax' branch e.g. in the K-01, K-5 etc.

actually the other Ricoh's have that feature!
My old Ricoh cx1 has it, you can choose 3 or. 5 frames and smal or big distance differences.

Link | Posted on Feb 25, 2012 at 11:57 UTC
On article NHK working on 8k video sensor capable of 120fps (94 comments in total)
In reply to:

wb2trf: But to get a decent OVF the mirror will have to move 120 times per second. That'll be hard. :-)

OR you can record at 60Fps and use 60Fps as live view.
Why would anyone even film in 120fps, exept slow motion recording?

Link | Posted on Feb 25, 2012 at 11:54 UTC
On photo Scuba in the Over & Under challenge (11 comments in total)
In reply to:

win39: I normally love this type of water shot which shows details below the surface as well as above. Pretty image, but I am disturbed by enlarged scale below the surface. The diver and ladder are much to large in comparison to the man and ladder on the boat. I am disturbed by backlit and cloudy above the surface and sun bright and from another direction below the surface. I am disturbed that the ladder above and below the water are at severely different angles. Seems to me if you are going to Photoshop something like this, it should at least look real.

@candlejack: the path of the light in going from the water to the UW-case of the Canon (air) into the lense. there comes the refraction.

The aspects of optics, refractive index, magnification are about right. the angle of the leader has to be there!

but: the diver is brighter than the boat. I belive thats not possible.

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2012 at 13:35 UTC

They don't have to make it in Canon Mount. ;-)

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2012 at 16:58 UTC as 39th comment | 7 replies
In reply to:

Mssimo: How good would a 5MP sensor be with todays technology?

18Mp is quite crazy for a ultra compact. I wonder how large the images are. (13-18MB?)

My Canon EOS 7D produces 18MP files that are muche smaller, like 7-9MB depending on the subject and the ISO value.
My guess would be, that the sony files would be even smaller, because of the smaller sensor... (4-6MB)

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2012 at 20:50 UTC

wow F6.3 thats slow!

Link | Posted on Jan 2, 2012 at 17:01 UTC as 31st comment
On article The 15 Minute Makeover: Photoshop Beauty Retouching (168 comments in total)
In reply to:

techmine: personally, I hate beautifying faces with Photoshop :-)

I guess its not the article for you then...

Link | Posted on Dec 8, 2011 at 22:52 UTC
On article Ricoh GR Digital IV Preview Samples (33 comments in total)

wonderful lens, but not so good sensor.
there is some noise at ISO 80 like a new DSLR has it at ISO 800
And ISO 3200 is not as good as a Canon S95, my opinion.

Link | Posted on Dec 5, 2011 at 23:07 UTC as 14th comment | 3 replies
On photo R0010478 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

@ ISO 3200 worse than a Canon s95, I guess.

Link | Posted on Dec 5, 2011 at 23:02 UTC as 1st comment
On a photo in the Ricoh GR Digital IV Preview Samples sample gallery (1 comment in total)

@ ISO 3200 worse than a Canon s95, I guess.

Link | Posted on Dec 5, 2011 at 23:02 UTC as 1st comment
On article Ricoh announces CX6 CMOS compact superzoom (35 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ashley Pomeroy: Talking about the flash, I've always wondered why some enterprising compact camera manufacturer doesn't build it as a ring around the lens mount; it'd be a mini ring flash. 'twould go down well with hobbyists, and even if it doesn't work very well it would at least be something to put in the press release.

I have the Metz 45CL-4 for night landscape photography @ ISO 400 it will lite 25 Meter in distance!
With the DSLR it's 256 meter with ISO 6400 and 30mm F1.4
It's fired with a Photodiod on the second flash...

Link | Posted on Nov 30, 2011 at 22:14 UTC
On article Fujifilm releases X-S1 premium EXR 26X superzoom (383 comments in total)
In reply to:

anthony mazzeri: Are the listed size dimensions correct? At 135mm(W) x 107mm(H), it makes this camera wider and higher than even a Nikon D7000.

It's almost a kilo in weight as well. A (Brooklyn) bridge camera. ;)

Well, I guess they decided to go with a bigger Sensor instead of compact body.
They could have made it smaller of course, with a smaller sensor or less bright lens...
But I like thayt they decided to make a quality product.

Link | Posted on Nov 25, 2011 at 15:39 UTC
On article Ricoh announces CX6 CMOS compact superzoom (35 comments in total)
In reply to:

toysandme: I see no mention of it here but the main reason why I have been attracted to Ricoh cameras over the years is their (almost) unique time-lapse feature. As a matter of fact, this is the only reason why I have bought their cameras. I hope they keep this feature and make it more flexible with say, one frame a second instead of one frame per 5 seconds.

Pentax W60 Outdoor Camera has a good time-lapse feature.
But I like the Ricoh better ;-)
It has way better IQ...

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2011 at 12:35 UTC
On article Just Posted: Sony SLT-A65 review (159 comments in total)
In reply to:

itsastickup: The Sony system is very attractive but for one issue: none of the pro/semi-pro zoom lenses have great bokeh, and some are downright awful. Canon lenses thrash Sonys at bokeh.

I really do want to buy in to Sony but this issue is a show-stopper.

what about the 135mm F1.8?

Link | Posted on Nov 16, 2011 at 12:53 UTC
On article Ricoh announces CX6 CMOS compact superzoom (35 comments in total)
In reply to:

Debankur Mukherjee: sensor size ??

1/2.33" --> same as the CX5

Link | Posted on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:15 UTC
Total: 100, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous2345Next ›Last »