inlawbiker

1. Programmable front dial. 2. Much less expensive?

I'm trying to figure out why this is relevant. Sure, Nikon's name is attached. But this is just a re-published press release ending with a question mark as to what this means. Couldn't DPReview do...

I was researching this a bit, I believe it has to do with the filesystem more than the camera. My idea is that any CF card will work. Most cameras and memory cards use the FAT32 (file allocation ...

I agree, I neglected to mention that the 9-18 is on my short list too. There are some times when it could be the only lens I would want. Greg.

Hey, we're on the same plan. I travel frequently and just acquired the E-M10 II. We're shooting pretty much the same things too. My lens kits currently and future: Compact kit: - 12-32 pancake zoom ...

Don't know what country your in or the availability, but sure it's still a good camera. Any of the 16mp cameras are still completely usable. Well, the 12mp models are too, but I would start with a ...

Alright I am figuring this out first-hand. I have always been a fan of the CCD sensor look. Is that magical? No, but I can tell the difference and I do like that look. I suppose I'm one of those ...

I ran 32gb in my D70s. I imagine the D70 is the same, since they are basically the same camera. If you want to play it safe, a couple 8gb cards should be fine. One for backup, one for use. 8gb ...

Hm I agree with your conclusion, the 18-140 is a convenient, pretty good lens but nothing to write home about. I slightly prefer the 18-200 to be honest, for the extra range and similar quality. I ...

Ha, well if I had any excuse to buy a D500 I would do it. I figured one of these two would suffice since 90% of my photos are with mirrorless now. So for fun I took the D200 up to the mountain for ...

I used to shoot a D7000 for a long time, for kids sports and family stuff. Wasn't the best sports camera but I figured out how to make it work. I always wanted a D300. Since then my kids quit ...

Am I sure? Well, no to be honest. I haven't compared them both side to side, which is what you asked about. If you look at DxO probably for the things they measure the 35-100 is better. Most of ...

I have owned it, but right now I own only the 35-100 2.8. The 45-175 is one of my favorite lenses. If you stop the 35-100 down to the same aperture used in the 45-175, it's hard to prefer one over ...

My favorite lens for DX reach was the old 80-200 2.8D (2-ring) version. This lens is frankly amazing. It's a big ole chunk of glass but it's outstanding all the way through the zoom range. If you ...

Seems like Olympus is making the product lines more distinct between the little E-PL, E-M5, and E-M10's. Olympus took away some things from the E-PL, such as you can no longer mount a VF. On E-M10 ...

Nice pictures, well done! I recently also switched to the E-M10 II, evolving from Nikon FX. I used several bodies in between, the E-M10 II seems to hit the sweet spot. I can't see myself traveling ...

Understandable. Buying cameras is fun but lenses make the difference. I spent Easter weekend usIng a g7 and the a g2 with the 35-100 2.8. Back to back, the G2 feels a relic. Like, why even bother ...

We have a g7 and g85. The g85’s better but it doesn’t take better pictures. Always go for the glass! You can also buy the lens for much less used. For example from KEH. Greg