inlawbiker

For reach, I am ok with 300mm 2.8 in ff terms. I used the 70-200s in crop and it was perfect for my use. I don’t know if such a thing exists for Fuji’s. Looking at the web I see a 50-140 I’d have ...

OK thanks, this is really encouraging. Spending a bunch on a new G9 or E-M1 mk2 doesn't sit real well with me since I already know they are not so hot with AF. And I am really still happy with the ...

Hey all, I've been lurking here for a while curious about Fujifilm, coming from Micro 4/3 after a mostly happy 8 years with the system. My needs have change a bit though. For most of my time I did ...

I would keep it simple and make photography a secondary priority. Two weeks isn't very long. Your kit is fully fleshed out but you're looking to add more? I think you have this covered. I'd bring ...

I had the same idea, and I thought the E-M10 II would be perfect for my wife. So we went to the camera store together to take a look. We played around with the cameras for a while and she disliked ...

Calling out the E-M10 II here for autofocus - that is the only complaint I have with this great little camera. The AF is terrible for anything other than S-AF. It will nail the first shot every ...

Pretty much everything is ahead of my E-M10 II. Everything. Retract? What is this the NYT? I'm not a journalist, but if you're unhappy with my opinion I offer a 100% guaranteed refund. Greg.

It isn't. 16mp is just fine for me and probably always will be. I have been a very happy Micro 4/3 user for years. I'm only unhappy with the AF system, it's still not as good as my 10 year old ...

It strikes the the E-M10 II was a full-featured camera for less money. At the time it had the same specs as the E-M5 II, even a little better in some areas, minus the larger viewfinder and weather ...

In this group, always has and probably always will. It's a high quality system but still small, just a little bigger, with a good collection of smallish lenses. Good, even better, jpegs than ...

I also recommend the Godox, but I have the TT600. It's basically the same flash but all manual, no TTL. I got it because it's also compatible with my Nikons and I could kill two birds. I'm OK with ...

Oh wait sorry - YES. Shoot, I can't make up my mind. I'll tell you in 2 to 5 years. Greg.

This thread is probably dead. But anyway, I had a G3 and used it for years. I was really excited to buy it, it was the first 16mp "modern" Panasonic camera. I ended up really disliking it and ...

A couple personal observations. I never liked the jpegs from the D70 even when I only shot the D70. I always thought they were awful. As for CCD cameras, whether there is something "special" or not ...

Me too. I'd like a 20mp sensor, bigger viewfinder, weather sealing, and better AF. I suppose you could call that an E-M5 III if it ever appears. Until that happens the E-M10.2 is my main and only ...

I think the 12-35 is a full step better than the 14-140 II. It does have the "wow" contrast that the 14-140 just doesn't. I love the 12-35 and it's the last lens I would sell. It's not as good as ...

I will admit I have a weakness for superzooms. This one looks really good but I'm struggling a little bit with it. 12mm is nice yes and so is up to 200mm. My problem is the Panasonic 14-140 II is ...

For your purposes I would go with a D7200. It is better for both birds and macro than a D610. The autofocus is much better and you have more reach with less cropping. It's also better for macro ...

I never had a problem with any of the old CCD camera images. I used the D70s for a long time and loved it. Never owned the D40, because a certain blogger raved about them so I could never find a ...

That is cool, I've never even used that feature! My E-M10 II just got even better.