baloo_buc

Only 50 mm and 100 mm lenses will survive the upgrade. Are you willing to pay a lot of money to replace 150-600 mm?

You should have looked at the prices prior to the switch. Extremely few lenses from Sony are up to their prices. Take care to buy FE lenses.

Lightroom made a good lens Correction module. It is the only reason I'm still using it (it's quite old version and Adobe disables it bit by bit lately).

Set to AF-C, set the AE-L/AF-L button to AF-ON not to AF-Lock only. Set custom setting c1 (Shutter Release Button AE-L to On if you want to half press to set the exposure or Off if you want to ...

You have just observed why some people don't like EVF.

The photo is from a Catholic Church (San Miniato al Monte) but this doesn't matter. I did the perspective adjustment in LR.

The shutter sound is almost the same in all Nikon dSLRs so it would be similar with Nikon D40 I also own). As per ISO 6400 here is a photo taken with D5100 (a little worse at high ISO than Nikon D5500

Most image viewers will see the embedded JPEG. I use IrfanView and FastStone. They work well for quick browsing of your files.

Unfortunately Canon T3 and Nikon D3400 have not the same quality. Canon sensor is an obsolete one while Nikon's is a modern one. https://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Nikon-D3400-ver ...

Up to a point this is true. But try putting 384 MP on an APS-C sensor. The advantage of high ISO is an inferred one. The advantage is that the image has more light.

The spring is either broken or displaced. Raise yourself the flash and see if it is detected. I would repair it or try to return it.

In Nikon open an unprocessed JPEG or RAW with a viewer that has EXIF reading (like IrfanView with all plug-ins installed). Look for the field "Total pictures" in Maker Note (Vendor) group: I have ...

Both will have virtually indistinguishably IQ if the lens and body have a perfect match. If it is not the case then D7200 will help with AF fine tune. Toch screens are superfluous for dSLR because ...

Both are low quality lenses. Usually in a trip you would not need more than 200 mm equivalent. It is nice to have VR. So the lenses suitable for your purpose are: (1) Nikon AF-S 18-105 mm VR

I don't know what tests say but I can spot immediately with which a photo was taken. It's not about the sharpness only (I guess they are comparable) but microcontrast, chromatic aberration and ...

I don't know about Panasonic 12-32 mm but the 14-42 mm from Olympus is night and day compared with Panasonic 12-60 mm.

While Panasonic was superseded by much better cameras Nikon D3300 was superseded by worse cameras because it was too good for its class (bare entry level).

If video is not your first priority then Nikon is better. In low light Panasonic will not even AF properly.

If you have generous budget don't go for handicapped cameras as you mentioned. Consider middle level cameras like Canon 80D and Nikon D7200 (or Nikon D7500 if you want 4k video). Get a good lens ...

Usually kit lenses have optical quality from horrible to barely decent. Unfortunately the lenses that have stellar optical quality are very expensive because you need expensive glass to improve ...