Joined on Oct 26, 2010


Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9
In reply to:

AbrasiveReducer: Interesting in that Canon already does an amazing job with CA.

Whatever you want to criticize about Canon, there are two things they do really well; sell more cameras than anybody else and make wide angle lenses with very low chromatic aberration.

Add Marketing to that list, though potentially drop 'sell more cameras than anybody else'. Too much of a blanket statement that I don't think holds across the term 'cameras'.

Link | Posted on Aug 27, 2015 at 17:17 UTC
On article Sony plans March firmware update for Alpha 7 and 7R (120 comments in total)

70-200mm f/4 FE, perhaps?

Link | Posted on Mar 7, 2014 at 18:50 UTC as 36th comment | 1 reply
On photo Denali, The High One in the Sea to Shining Sea : Alaska challenge (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

bhollis: My favorite of the bunch. Very nice.

Thank you :) It's still one of my favorites to this day, though my photography has more depth and technique, it's hard to beat being at the right place at the right time and somehow pulling off the technical aspects needed.

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2014 at 16:20 UTC
In reply to:

jhinkey: OK Nikon, now you just have to make a 24/1.8 and then you can get on to more important matters:
16/2.8 AFS fisheye
20/2.8 AFS
45/2.8 AFS (compact please)
400/5.6AFS VR
and then you'll get some of my cash.

Why not a 135mm f/1.8, goshigoo? Zeiss made an AF one for the sony A mount, so it's not like it can't be done, and done well.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2014 at 17:56 UTC
On article Classic photographs recreated in Lego (117 comments in total)
In reply to:

AndreyT: At first one wonders what was the point of reposting these images again, after we have seen them hundreds of times already (they were making rounds around the Net for a few years now). But then one notices that there's an obvious political bias in the selection of these images: out of all those well-known Lego photo recreation pictures only the ones were cherry picked that fit certain propaganda-censorship agenda. And then a few "neutral" pictures were added to masquerade the original intent. Apparently someone at "dpreview staff" saw this veiled trolling opportunity and took it.

And the moon landing was faked, too. Whaaaat. It sounds like you must love conspiracy theories :)

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2013 at 21:09 UTC
On article SmugMug launches totally redesigned website (69 comments in total)

I'm enjoying the update, even for my $40 basic account. Looks much better than it did before. However, though more attractive, the interface is a little laggy and not entirely intuitive (though that hasn't changed).

Link | Posted on Jul 30, 2013 at 20:47 UTC as 48th comment
In reply to:

acidic: I just noticed the weight. 810g for APS-C lens? Holy Shatner!

Okay, I know it's super fast and all that, but if it's seriously supposed to convince FF shooters to go APS-C, it's measly 2x zoom range isn't helping any, considering that it's FF counterparts don't weigh much more and have closer to 3x zoom range. Of course if it's significantly cheaper, say in the $900 range, it could be a winner.

Even if it has a decent weight to it, if the image quality is on par with the 35mm f/1.4, it'll be like carrying around a 28mm f/1.8, 35mm f/1.8, and 50mm f/1.8 (for light gathering capacities, not DOF, as it'd be f/2.7 for DOF, but still.) I'd be very interested if I wasn't shooting FF.

Link | Posted on Apr 18, 2013 at 05:40 UTC
On article Photokina 2012: Sony Stand Report (44 comments in total)
In reply to:

facedodge: I don't like the way the A99 flips out... they should copy the Canon way of doing it.

I think all of the above are too easily damaged for my taste, however the Sony method currently gives you far more angles of use than the Canon method.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2012 at 14:17 UTC
On photo answer the phone in the Phone challenge (2 comments in total)

I absolutely love this shot. And I expect it may win as well. Good luck!

Link | Posted on Aug 17, 2011 at 00:49 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9