Anepo

Lives in Iceland Reykjavik, Iceland
Works as a commercial printing
Joined on Jul 1, 2009

Comments

Total: 282, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Pentax unveils blue and white K-01 in Japan (262 comments in total)

*facedesks* Pentax/Ricoh you will NEVER learn!

Link | Posted on Jul 4, 2013 at 21:24 UTC as 71st comment | 2 replies
On article Just Posted: Pentax Q7 Real-world Samples Gallery (136 comments in total)
In reply to:

Anepo: What is the POINT of having a camera with interchangeable lenses that is worse than SEVERAL compact camera's with non nterchangeable lenses? This is basicly a TOY mirrorless rather than a REAL high quality mirrorless like the gx1, om-d, epl-5 e-pm1 e-pm2 & such.

@nathebeach it is an overpriced compact camera with interchangeable lenses delivering worse iq than some premium compacts. And your claim about dof on m43s and dslrs is an outright and outrageus lie. And you can stop ranting whenever you like, nobody is forcing you...

Link | Posted on Jul 4, 2013 at 07:07 UTC
On article Just Posted: Pentax Q7 Real-world Samples Gallery (136 comments in total)
In reply to:

Anepo: What is the POINT of having a camera with interchangeable lenses that is worse than SEVERAL compact camera's with non nterchangeable lenses? This is basicly a TOY mirrorless rather than a REAL high quality mirrorless like the gx1, om-d, epl-5 e-pm1 e-pm2 & such.

@drugarunda the ep-m1 has a far superior low light ability and stating it was better is pure false, also you claim the q7 will be better than several m43 cameras shows your false claims as it is not out yet and thus you are saying something is a fact while having no evidence to back such a claim.s

Link | Posted on Jul 4, 2013 at 07:04 UTC
On article Just Posted: Pentax Q7 Real-world Samples Gallery (136 comments in total)
In reply to:

Anepo: What is the POINT of having a camera with interchangeable lenses that is worse than SEVERAL compact camera's with non nterchangeable lenses? This is basicly a TOY mirrorless rather than a REAL high quality mirrorless like the gx1, om-d, epl-5 e-pm1 e-pm2 & such.

@jimmy jang boo my point is an overpriced under performng product that delivers less image quality than some premium compacts.

Link | Posted on Jul 4, 2013 at 07:01 UTC
On article Just Posted: Pentax Q7 Real-world Samples Gallery (136 comments in total)
In reply to:

Anepo: What is the POINT of having a camera with interchangeable lenses that is worse than SEVERAL compact camera's with non nterchangeable lenses? This is basicly a TOY mirrorless rather than a REAL high quality mirrorless like the gx1, om-d, epl-5 e-pm1 e-pm2 & such.

@sdribetahi that is utterly false, accusing someone of fanboyism is just a way to try to slander theyre credability, i have owned several slrs and dslrs made by pentax so dont even try this bs!

Link | Posted on Jul 4, 2013 at 06:59 UTC
On article Canon announces EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM wide zoom (55 comments in total)
In reply to:

peevee1: "We're told the lens isn't going to be available in the USA, at least for now."

I guess nobody was stupid enough to buy EOS M in the US? ;)

You are giving American's WAYYYYYYYYYYYY to much credit.

Link | Posted on Jul 3, 2013 at 22:27 UTC
On article Sony unleashes Cyber-shot RX100 II with BSI CMOS sensor (174 comments in total)
In reply to:

Shamael: 750$, they are kiddin'. For that price i will step over to the GR from Ricoh, i certainly have the missing 40$ somewhere in a drawer.

It is a bit to high for my taste as well I would of been happy with it as 600$ & I will not be purchasing it due to the price point, however I really like this camera but it is outside my price point.

I am sure it is one of the top 5 compact camera's out there but still it is to much for my taste.

Link | Posted on Jul 3, 2013 at 22:20 UTC
On article Sony unleashes Cyber-shot RX100 II with BSI CMOS sensor (174 comments in total)
In reply to:

tolleknolle: The claimed 1/2 stop seems to be in JPEG processing. RAW data puts the original RX100 well ahead of Mk2 at lower ISOs: http://www.techradar.com/reviews/cameras-and-camcorders/cameras/compact-cameras/sony-rx100-ii-1160503/review/5#articleContent

Someone actually trusts techradar? What next? believe in arstechnica & cnet? oh lord people these days, so misinformed.

Link | Posted on Jul 3, 2013 at 22:18 UTC
On article Just Posted: Pentax Q7 Real-world Samples Gallery (136 comments in total)

What is the POINT of having a camera with interchangeable lenses that is worse than SEVERAL compact camera's with non nterchangeable lenses? This is basicly a TOY mirrorless rather than a REAL high quality mirrorless like the gx1, om-d, epl-5 e-pm1 e-pm2 & such.

Link | Posted on Jul 3, 2013 at 21:41 UTC as 42nd comment | 15 replies

To bad he did not show us an even slower video to show a "real bullet time" this was to fast to be counted even as a copy of the bullet effect.

Link | Posted on Jul 2, 2013 at 22:28 UTC as 26th comment

Compared to how Ricoh camera's look I think this is the end of both Pentax AND Ricoh, after Ricoh purchased Pentax, I have ONLY seen UGLY DSLR camera's & I used to be a proud owner of the Pentax K10D & K20D.
After the purchase Ricoh keeps pushing me MORE and MORE away from the Pentax brand & Ricoh brand & I am NEVER returning.

Link | Posted on Jul 2, 2013 at 20:09 UTC as 37th comment
On article Olympus TG-2 iHS (106 comments in total)
In reply to:

keeponkeepingon: Can we burry this phrase. It's overused, apologetic, meaningless and a bit silly:

"Photo quality isn't fantastic on the TG-2, but it's more than good enough for purpose and target audience. "

Olympus claims that "the Olympus TG-2 iHS was designed with the serious photographer in mind. ". If the target audience is the serious photographer, I would think IQ would be a concern.

I agree if Olympus claims it to be designed with the serious photographer in mind they should review it that way and to be honest it would be DEMOLISHED in the review then because of how stupid Olympus were to say that.

Link | Posted on Jun 29, 2013 at 11:36 UTC
On article Carl Zeiss drops 'Carl', becomes 'ZEISS' (111 comments in total)

in my country we always say Carl Zeiss & we don't confuse it with anything because there is no company named Carl in our country because CARL is not a name in our country.

Link | Posted on Jun 29, 2013 at 08:32 UTC as 36th comment
On article Best DSLRs and ILCs for less than $1000 (271 comments in total)

I had the GX1..... focus is crap & it is a very loud camera compared to other micro four thirds from olympus.

Link | Posted on Jun 29, 2013 at 08:30 UTC as 67th comment
On article Roundup: Digital Cameras for Kids (64 comments in total)
In reply to:

udris: Kids use smartphones and pretty effectively and have no inkling to go backwards in technology. Another few years and point and shoots are redundant

That has been said for YEARS. And they are still not there, nor will they EVER be, why? DEPTH OF FIELD. Compact's got them & cellphones do NOT

Link | Posted on Jun 24, 2013 at 10:46 UTC
On article Eyeist serves up portfolio reviews the digital way (8 comments in total)
In reply to:

Anepo: Most of the reviewers are NOT professional photographers! So is this a website i would trust for a professional review? Well only if one of the photographers reviews it and judging by numbers the odds of them reviewing it are small!

Not quite,they got a director, it does not say "a photography director" and then there are titles like "consultant" i am asking for a professional photographer who know photography from before he clicks the button until its completely edited and fixed up to review it, not someone that is simply a consultant or someone that only takes part in a small area of photography. I want chase jarvis NOT steve ballmer to tell me what a good photo is and is not.

Link | Posted on Jun 23, 2013 at 23:14 UTC
On article Best Digital Cameras for Kids (146 comments in total)
In reply to:

Picturenaut: I'd not recommend a 1.2 MP toy camera such as KidiZoom even for 5 yrs old children, because its IQ, in particular of its LCD screens is ways too bad for kid's eyes. My experience is that even very young kids are quickly bored and dissapointed by such bad cameras and abandon them. With their sharp eyes and fresh minds they see so much more than we adults, and they are fond of small things and tiny details. A camera must meet this challenge.

So I think it is much better to start early with a rugged compact with much better IQ and LCD screen . IMO a camera such as a Coolpix S31 is a much better entry even for very young kids. They are smart and quickly discover how to use it.

And the one my brothers daughter owned broke after just dropping it ONCE

Link | Posted on Jun 23, 2013 at 15:33 UTC
On article Eyeist serves up portfolio reviews the digital way (8 comments in total)

Most of the reviewers are NOT professional photographers! So is this a website i would trust for a professional review? Well only if one of the photographers reviews it and judging by numbers the odds of them reviewing it are small!

Link | Posted on Jun 23, 2013 at 10:13 UTC as 3rd comment | 3 replies
On article Lumu turns iPhone into incident light meter (14 comments in total)
In reply to:

ian adams: This sounds like a solution in search of a problem. The built-in
exposure meters on dSLR and point-&-shoot digital cameras are superb, and together with in-camera histograms provide precise exposure control. The current iPhone 5 also has a good exposure meter and does not allow you to set an exposure manually from a meter reading. Finally, incident light meters may be useful in studio photography but they are generally useless for scenic and other outdoor photography.

The Lumu is nothing more than an expensive gimmick.

Ever heard of a magic device called a film camera?

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2013 at 00:57 UTC
Total: 282, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »