Woland65

agree, I love the 1.7-1.8 primes, and a ridiculously small wide angle zoom. I have one on my camera and one in each jacket pocket and forget they are even there.

If more FF lenses designed for small size come out I will switch to FF. These are still substantially heavier than the m43 lenses though, at 210-220 gram. I consider my 25/1.4 heavy and that is ...

That can happen, yes.

It is not about the cost, not for me. I care about the selection of small lenses.

Yeah, agree, the 1.2 lens would be just for home use, not for carrying around. I am mostly just curious about trying one out for a while. I probably wouldn't use it much.

agree, I didn't go into m43 again to join a cult. It just ended up being my primary choice again. I certainly don't mind trying other stuff too, and as you say, there are good bargains on the used ...

I understand that FF is better for many people, and for many people it is worth carrying the lenses. If you need the extra dynamic range, or if you need the high ISO of a fast FF lens, or if you ...

ok,  I probably will do that

Most likely 30-50 mm. Thats where I can find fast and reasonably sized FF lenses, and yes with a reasonable price too.

Yes, I might do that. Buy a cheap used A7 II to try it out. Would be fun.

And I have come to love the small lenses.

Yup, 99% of the limitations come from me, not the camera.

Just went through this again. Reading comparing. Checking ISO performance. Prices. Available lenses. Started out really thinking I would go for a full frame this time (most probably Sony). I ...