nayyyyyyy7

nayyyyyyy7

Lives in Canada Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Works as a Student
Joined on Jun 15, 2020
About me:

Just a student who's interested in photography and camera gear!

Comments

Total: 14, showing: 1 – 14
On article New Leica SL2-S is a more accessible, video-focused SL2 (103 comments in total)

Wow, just released and 2 people owned it before!

Link | Posted on Dec 10, 2020 at 15:14 UTC as 24th comment | 1 reply

Yayyyyyy! Glad you covered this! Honestly, Canon should hire Matt and implement his technique in an updated β€˜Canon R5s’! Unless Canon specifically chose not to include good cooling to save their cinema line.... πŸ‘€

Link | Posted on Dec 3, 2020 at 15:11 UTC as 109th comment

Would be great for the X mount.......

Link | Posted on Dec 1, 2020 at 14:01 UTC as 23rd comment
On article Our favorite gear, rewarded: DPReview Awards 2020 (574 comments in total)

YESSSSS!!!! Fuji really killed it this year!

Link | Posted on Nov 25, 2020 at 21:23 UTC as 77th comment | 1 reply
On article Our favorite gear, rewarded: DPReview Awards 2020 (574 comments in total)
In reply to:

entoman: Congratulations Canon, truly well deserved.

After lagging some way behind Nikon (DSLRs) and Sony (MILCs) for the last 5 years, you've well and truly made the grade!

Now we await the APS-C Canon R7.... please be good... and come soon!

Link | Posted on Nov 25, 2020 at 16:32 UTC
In reply to:

Camera Conspiracies: Lighter than Sony. Too bad nothing will be in focus.

OMGGGG HIIIIIIIIII!!!!!!!!!!!!! IVE BEEN YOUR FAN FOR A LONG TIME! ITS SO COOL TO SEE YOU HERE!

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2020 at 14:19 UTC

Lmao looks like a sigma and zeiss lens had a baby

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2020 at 14:17 UTC as 20th comment | 3 replies
On article iPhone 12: Which models have which cameras? (176 comments in total)

LOL 52mm is what we consider normal... but it seems like Apple thinks its telephoto enough.

Link | Posted on Oct 23, 2020 at 18:34 UTC as 12th comment | 3 replies
On article Canon EOS R5 review (2973 comments in total)
In reply to:

nayyyyyyy7: Honestly, it's great to see an honest review on the R5 that's more photography based. When it first came out, there were many YouTube first impression videos on it, and the YouTubers only care about video on any new cameras they get. All they did was rave about the overheating in 8k, 4kHQ, and 4k120 when no other camera brands have those features. They basically used the overheating to gain more popularity and completely ignored the photography side of this camera, which led to bad press for Canon.

Of course, Canon is also at fault for this because they marketed and advertised it for all its video features, when they should've focused on the photography side of it, which is the more amazing part.

Ya, that’s fair. Thanks for replying!

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2020 at 02:14 UTC
On article Canon EOS R5 review (2973 comments in total)

Honestly, it's great to see an honest review on the R5 that's more photography based. When it first came out, there were many YouTube first impression videos on it, and the YouTubers only care about video on any new cameras they get. All they did was rave about the overheating in 8k, 4kHQ, and 4k120 when no other camera brands have those features. They basically used the overheating to gain more popularity and completely ignored the photography side of this camera, which led to bad press for Canon.

Of course, Canon is also at fault for this because they marketed and advertised it for all its video features, when they should've focused on the photography side of it, which is the more amazing part.

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2020 at 15:16 UTC as 215th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

fPrime: Good to see Fuji price this camera realistically. Now if they could only do the same for their overpriced lenses.

For the quality that you're getting from the lenses, they are actually really well priced. Like the 50-140 2.8 for example, it's $1600, but when you compare it with Canon, Nikon and Sony, their 70-200's are $2100(EF) /$2700(RF), $2350(F)/$2600(Z), and $2600 respectively.

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2020 at 18:18 UTC
In reply to:

GreatOceanSoftware: Ok I guess. But I wish they had spent this engineering effort and dollars on the X-T40, and reducing the size and weight of the X-T line in general, along with lighter lenses. I often reach for the M6 II with 11-22 over the X-T3 with 8-12 just because of the bulk, but I take a hit in image quality, weather sealing, etc. I feel like Fuji could do it, especially after seeing what Sony did with the C.

I don't think you can compare the fuji 8-16 with the canon 11-22. It's a variable aperture lens while the 8-16 is an f/2.8 lens. The 10-24 would be the closest one to compare it with or even one of the primes like the 16 2.8. And like the comment above, the X-Ax line or even the rumoured X-E4 might be a better fit for you.

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2020 at 18:11 UTC
In reply to:

nayyyyyyy7: I would probably buy into Nikon Z if they had a larger lens selection. The camera bodies are great, but the lenses are limited and expensive. I think Nikon should open up to 3rd parties like Sigma, Tamron, etc. That would really be great.

Also maybe have a budget options for the primes. I know they're great, but $800 CAD for the 50mm and $1100 CAD for the 35mm and 85mm.... 😬😬😭😭

Anyways, just my thoughts.

@junk1 oh thats true. thanks!

@bernardland outstand but expensive... especially because I'm still a student and don't have the money for it πŸ˜…

Link | Posted on Oct 1, 2020 at 13:29 UTC

I would probably buy into Nikon Z if they had a larger lens selection. The camera bodies are great, but the lenses are limited and expensive. I think Nikon should open up to 3rd parties like Sigma, Tamron, etc. That would really be great.

Also maybe have a budget options for the primes. I know they're great, but $800 CAD for the 50mm and $1100 CAD for the 35mm and 85mm.... 😬😬😭😭

Anyways, just my thoughts.

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2020 at 17:05 UTC as 120th comment | 3 replies
Total: 14, showing: 1 – 14