Lives in Canada Vancouver, Canada
Works as a Techie
Joined on May 25, 2012
About me:



Total: 12, showing: 1 – 12
In reply to:

(unknown member): I have the 105/2.8 Micro and love its bokeh. I never wanted more background blur. Being a macro lens, it lets you get close to the subject which increases background blur more than a wider aperture. With 1 meter of minimum focus distance, heavy weight and high price, the new lens doesn't interest me.

I have used that 105 2.8 and i love it, but this is 1.4 and 9 rounded blades! I just can't afford it though...

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2016 at 05:38 UTC

So this is what Nikon is bringing out for it's birthday! Bravo!

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2016 at 04:49 UTC as 116th comment
On article Canon creates on-screen user-guides for EOS-1D X (48 comments in total)

is this somewhat similar to the Nikon D3100 tutorial stuff? if so, great canon! now anyone with 7K to spend can look like a pro! :maximumsarcasam:

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2012 at 01:03 UTC as 14th comment

NR just posted some photos of the 18-300 and the 2nd photo is very interesting since it is showing the lens extended and upright, with no lens creep. boom!

Link | Posted on Jun 27, 2012 at 13:23 UTC as 13th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

RoccoGalatioto: Nikon should be ashamed of themselves for even considering a plastic mount.

i can see the photo alright, but i have read somewhere where they said it is metal, and the photo is not very conclusive, i think all the old 24-85 were all metal, hence hard to believe this is plastic, in any case we shall see...

Link | Posted on Jun 17, 2012 at 17:33 UTC
In reply to:

RoccoGalatioto: Nikon should be ashamed of themselves for even considering a plastic mount.

where did you get the info of plastic mount?

Link | Posted on Jun 17, 2012 at 16:56 UTC
In reply to:

gl2k: 24-120 f4 VR
Why does the world "need" another lens in that range ?

2 words: price and price

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2012 at 16:36 UTC

just sold my 18-200 VRII... :D

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2012 at 14:32 UTC as 36th comment

This lens is perfect for the D600... but where is the 24-70 f2.8 with VRII???

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2012 at 09:15 UTC as 76th comment | 1 reply

funny, so many negative comments when i don't think nobody here has even seen it yet first hand, let alone used it on real life application... :rolleyes:

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2012 at 16:37 UTC as 16th comment | 1 reply
On article Just Posted: Canon EOS 5D Mark III review (705 comments in total)
In reply to:

Halfdan Faber: Well, I decided to take the trouble and line up the ratings in an image editor, to attempt to extract the detailed figures. Below are my findings. I have used a uniformly weighted ranking of Poor=0 to Excellent=14. As others have noted, the D800 did indeed score slightly higher. DPR has responded to previous poster by stating that the scales have different starting points. If this is true then their ranking figures are deceptive. On the merit of the actual numbers, I would say that the rankings are not credible and the overall equal ranking appears to be a fabricated result.

_______________D800___5D Mk-III
Build Quality__10.0___11.0
IQ Raw_________12.65__12.15
IQ JPG_________9.40___8.65
ISO Perf.______11.0___10.85



you are having too much time in your hands... :)

Link | Posted on May 29, 2012 at 02:20 UTC
On article Just Posted: Canon EOS 5D Mark III review (705 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jonathan F/2: Dpreview scores are definitely tainted. The D800 and 5Dm3 get the same score? So despite having 36mp and being $500 USD cheaper, you guys feel the 5D mark III is equal to the D800? The cons for the D800 are more like niggles, while the cons for the 5Dm3 are issues of concern. And even stated on the 5Dm3 review itself "Scoring is relative only to the other cameras in the same category." Yeah right.

it is not easy making a tech reviews, i know i have blogged about it and wrote on some forums as well, however the right thing to do is always be honest...

why many here are crying foul, is the fact that when you add up all the features and plus factors, it seems as though that the D800 wins it! the fact that the reviewers did not justify why then the same score between the 5DMK3 and D800, is BS! if you are biased, just have the balls to admit it, or else just write why it ended that way... just my 0.2

and yea, i am not writing which cam is best, i can't do that, since i have not reviewed both cams, i do have an opinion about it, but that is besides the point... i am writing on the basis of the reviews, all i am saying is have the balls, just don't BS us!

Link | Posted on May 25, 2012 at 13:11 UTC
Total: 12, showing: 1 – 12