PORTRAIT

PORTRAIT

Lives in Canada On., Canada
Joined on Jan 19, 2010

Comments

Total: 28, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »

Very cool indeed!..uhmm gotta find a.. Bird now;)..

Link | Posted on Jul 19, 2017 at 00:56 UTC as 29th comment | 1 reply
On article Canon PowerShot G3 X: What you need to know (617 comments in total)

...Does anyone know if it carries only mechanical Shutter at 1/2000?? No Electronic Shutter ??..

Thanks

Link | Posted on Jul 10, 2017 at 15:16 UTC as 3rd comment
On article Fujifilm X-A3 added to studio scene comparison (105 comments in total)

Indeed it seems to me, that we have another Fuji little..Wonder here;)..

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2017 at 13:17 UTC as 18th comment | 1 reply

Absolutely Amazing!.. And what camera was used for this .. Work?;)..

Link | Posted on Jun 2, 2017 at 01:54 UTC as 13th comment | 1 reply

Hey, on the positive note, this time, they were careful not to use the word..."Dismantle";)...

Link | Posted on Apr 3, 2017 at 19:28 UTC as 41st comment

Great Informative Videos Indeed..Almost like shopping from a Mortar&Brick store being sitting at..home;)..

Marco

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2017 at 18:24 UTC as 2nd comment

Nikon where are you???;)

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2017 at 18:59 UTC as 12th comment | 1 reply

Fantastic video from Croatia!, I truly enjoyed! it!...I love the 4K feature on my Lumix as well;) Thanks for sharing!..

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2017 at 19:10 UTC as 41st comment

Nice images from the FZ2500, But nothing than my FZ1000 cannot handle;)I'm not a big fun of all these "touch screens" not really my "thing";) Otherwise a well all round camera for those don't want to have all the "fun" of carrying the DSLR gear;)By the way I just shot my Daughter at the Xmas concert the other night with my FZ 1000 a mix of video and stills at full zoom in extremely low light condition(ISO 1600/ 3200), and I can tell you I was impressed.. ;)

Link | Posted on Dec 9, 2016 at 20:24 UTC as 16th comment

Seriously,Nikon..That's ..it? Are these all the excitement.. news??..Now I'm still waiting for a replacement of my..V1;)

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 17:47 UTC as 18th comment
In reply to:

PORTRAIT: Impressive product for sure, I absolutely love my FZ1000,but will it be enough to make me drool for an upgrade?,Let's see here,the lens is a bit longer,(480 vs. 400mm.but slightly slower F 4.0 vs.4.5) the ND filter built in is a nice touch tough, makes you save $$$;) better video for sure 4k 60mbps vs. 4k 30mbps..uhmm..

ahh same 20 Mp. sensor right?..

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 14:35 UTC

Impressive product for sure, I absolutely love my FZ1000,but will it be enough to make me drool for an upgrade?,Let's see here,the lens is a bit longer,(480 vs. 400mm.but slightly slower F 4.0 vs.4.5) the ND filter built in is a nice touch tough, makes you save $$$;) better video for sure 4k 60mbps vs. 4k 30mbps..uhmm..

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 14:34 UTC as 132nd comment | 1 reply
On article 6K here we come: Here's the new Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH5 (173 comments in total)

6K??!! Unbelievable...Who says Panasonic will NOT steal the show at the Photokina?..

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 14:23 UTC as 41st comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

PORTRAIT: I Absolutely love my FZ1000,but looking at the specs.of the FZ 2500, I'm not sure that is enough to make drool for an upgrade..Sure the lens is slightly longer, but.. slower!..Marco

JND,Yes the ND filter built in is a convenient feature though..It will save you pretty $$$.;)

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 13:41 UTC

I Absolutely love my FZ1000,but looking at the specs.of the FZ 2500, I'm not sure that is enough to make drool for an upgrade..Sure the lens is slightly longer, but.. slower!..Marco

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 11:45 UTC as 12th comment | 2 replies
On article The price is right: Canon EOS Rebel T6 / 1300D Review (422 comments in total)
In reply to:

SETI: Picture quality is very disappointing. And I'm Canon user now. My first digital DSLR Nikon D50 with Sigma 18-125mm did much better shots.

Yes, for the same reason I still hang on to my D40X..;)

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2016 at 13:05 UTC
On article Sony Alpha SLT-A68 real-world samples (116 comments in total)
In reply to:

PORTRAIT: I had A55, the first generation DSLT cam.,Amazing features at that time: 10FPS,FAST LV AF,IBIS,just to name fews..Anyway,I had wonderful memories as well, (weddings, family event, etc..)Never let me down, except for these little "details":
.1 The infamous video heating issue,(basically unusable if you were planning to shoot more than 10/15mns. above 25c..And W/o having the cam quitting on ya, just when you were shooting..;)...and as far as I understand, the new A6300 has the same issue?.
.2 Flash system is mediocre at best (very unreliable!..nothing can beat Nikon system,my D40X has still an incredible metering/flash system..!)
3.Lenses, just Okish, (unless you are willing to spend $$$ with Zeiss be my guest..)but luckily, Minolta has a plethora of old vintage very cheap ones,but again, there where always the downside of the PF issue with many of those lenses...Overall I found the kit lens inferior even compare to my Nikon 18-55mm...,So Sony for these "few" reason I'M ..OUT..;)

Eleson,

Yes almost forgot, that DSLT system implied the "loss of light", and for many this could be a deal breaker..My A55, was almost unusable by the time I was reaching ISO 1600, while somehow, you could overcome that issue,with some of the Sony in camera "gimmicks",it was never w/o trade off... If your type of photography is manly outdoor, you have nothing to worry about It. It is true the opposite, if you type of photography implied also indoor events, than I think there are better option out there... APC/FF sensor Mirrorless cams nowdays,have reached the speed of the DSLR, at the least in good light, and are not that far off even to be use on indoor events, while the lack of native lenses for many is still a of an issue, if you are comfortable, with using adaptors and such, which personally I don't really like it, as it adds weight and so it start to become cumbersome, and so for me it is the end of a mirrorless system as it will be no longer CONVENIENT..my 2 cents thought..;)

Link | Posted on Jun 29, 2016 at 19:25 UTC
On article Sony Alpha SLT-A68 real-world samples (116 comments in total)

I had A55, the first generation DSLT cam.,Amazing features at that time: 10FPS,FAST LV AF,IBIS,just to name fews..Anyway,I had wonderful memories as well, (weddings, family event, etc..)Never let me down, except for these little "details":
.1 The infamous video heating issue,(basically unusable if you were planning to shoot more than 10/15mns. above 25c..And W/o having the cam quitting on ya, just when you were shooting..;)...and as far as I understand, the new A6300 has the same issue?.
.2 Flash system is mediocre at best (very unreliable!..nothing can beat Nikon system,my D40X has still an incredible metering/flash system..!)
3.Lenses, just Okish, (unless you are willing to spend $$$ with Zeiss be my guest..)but luckily, Minolta has a plethora of old vintage very cheap ones,but again, there where always the downside of the PF issue with many of those lenses...Overall I found the kit lens inferior even compare to my Nikon 18-55mm...,So Sony for these "few" reason I'M ..OUT..;)

Link | Posted on Jun 29, 2016 at 13:42 UTC as 22nd comment | 8 replies
On article Lens shootout: Sony RX10 III destroys the competition (502 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marximus: I've had the RX10 III for a couple weeks, coming from the FZ1000. I really wanted the range, so pretty much as soon as I got the Sony, the Panasonic was on eBay. That was a mistake, IMO. The Sony is quite a bit slower in multiple areas: startup, autofocus, low light performance. I shot quite a bit with it and it seemed okay, but just to make sure, I purchased the FZ1000 again (crazy, I know) to do some final testing. I took it to the zoo today, and within a couple shots, the Sony was back in the bag and I used the FZ1000 for the rest of the day. The difference in my experience is nearly night and day. For all my critical areas, the Panasonic wins, hands down. Faster startup, blazing fast autofocus, better low light performance, lighter in weight, a fully articulating screen, and about half the price. After doing the comparison, one of the few areas in which the Sony is superior is with that extra reach. I looked at the comparison shots and it does appear that the Sony lens is a bit sharper. And the weather sealing/build quality is nice. But these are all compromises I'm very willing to make. I absolutely love the FZ1000 and I'll be returning the RX10 III. And I'll keep my eye out for the FZ2000:).

Well said,I've been enjoyed my FZ1000 like no other cams before..and I'm coming from DSLR system(from Nikon to Sony..)Now the FZ1000 covered most of my needs.I do have N1V1 as a "pocket cam" when I don't want the "bulkiness"of the FZ1000. I may expand my gear on 4/3 system (since Nikon seems to abandon the N1 system..)just when I'll being miss W/A and DOF...
Marco

Link | Posted on May 26, 2016 at 20:10 UTC

May be they are cooking up something...FF commitment only? who knows.. ;)..

Link | Posted on Nov 27, 2015 at 19:19 UTC as 82nd comment | 1 reply
Total: 28, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »