pictureAngst

Lives in United Kingdom Surrey, United Kingdom
Works as a IT nerd
Joined on Sep 16, 2011

Comments

Total: 219, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

tinternaut: Presumably, for a fairly static landscape scene where parallax errors shouldn’t (?) be an issue, this would enable be 5DIV user to expose a little more for the shadows, safe in the knowledge there’s some better protected highlight data in the second photo?

Reading the article, it sounds like the ‘hidden’ image is already -1 EV lower than the ‘standard’ image, so I were to make any adjustment it might be to dial in +0.5 EV so that when I merge the 2 images the result has the same exposure as the camera would have used.

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2018 at 19:51 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 OIS WR Macro sample gallery (92 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jim King: The description above states "the Fujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 Macro is the first X-series lens to give full 1:1 reproduction." That's not the case, as the Zeiss Touit 50mm f2.8 Macro for Fuji X also delivers 1:1 reproduction and it has been available for over three years now.

I’m guessing when they say ‘X-Series’ they mean Fuji lenses

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2018 at 09:26 UTC

Not surprised the Oly did so well.

I had the original E-1 which was an AWESOMELY well built camera, so I know when they say they’re kit is weatherproofed it’s definitely weatherproofed.

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2018 at 20:57 UTC as 14th comment

I had the E-1 with the 14-54 'kit' lens - it had such a wonderful well-rounded quality to it, in terms of build quality (the turn-key latches on the waterproofed doors were amazing) and picture quality (the lens and the 55-200 I subsequently bought were superb in every way).

Inevitably my head was turned by the next wave of technology, but to be honest if events had made me stick with that kit, I doubt if my pictures would have suffered for it in any meaningful way.

Link | Posted on Dec 22, 2017 at 20:35 UTC as 4th comment

All the Calgary detectives need to do next is check Flickr and other photo sharing sites for well composed, sharp, and correctly exposed photos from an M-P and then they’ll know they’re on to an imposter!

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2017 at 20:15 UTC as 28th comment

Some yellow things make you look cool - like a Ferrari (or a Ducati), or perhaps some limited edition trainers. Or maybe expensive ski gear.

A big shiny plastic backpack? Not so much.

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2017 at 23:49 UTC as 6th comment | 3 replies

Not sure about the new NG wildlife photographer policy limiting their travel budget to within the Animal Kingdom.

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2017 at 22:54 UTC as 42nd comment
On article Olympus 17mm F1.2 Pro sample gallery (409 comments in total)
In reply to:

pictureAngst: What is it with reviews of 35mm equiv lenses focussing on depth of field so much?

Even when I shot with fast ‘real’ 35s (including the Summicron ‘King of Bokeh’) it was never my first choice (or even second) for thin DOF shots - that’s what 85s and higher are for.

Am I missing something?

I do get the whole ‘environmental portrait’ thing, and have taken many shots in that style, but most of the time if you’re taking this kind of shot, you don’t want to blur the environment to the degree of it not being recognisable. That’s why IMO most of these shots favour f4 or slower.

IMO the real advantage of a wide aperture wide angle is low light shots, where the rule-of-thumb 1/35s minimum shutter speed and great light-gathering aperture come together perfectly.

Link | Posted on Dec 10, 2017 at 20:30 UTC
On article Olympus 17mm F1.2 Pro sample gallery (409 comments in total)
In reply to:

pictureAngst: What is it with reviews of 35mm equiv lenses focussing on depth of field so much?

Even when I shot with fast ‘real’ 35s (including the Summicron ‘King of Bokeh’) it was never my first choice (or even second) for thin DOF shots - that’s what 85s and higher are for.

Am I missing something?

...and that’s not taking anything away from this lens, which is superb.

Link | Posted on Dec 10, 2017 at 19:19 UTC
On article Olympus 17mm F1.2 Pro sample gallery (409 comments in total)

What is it with reviews of 35mm equiv lenses focussing on depth of field so much?

Even when I shot with fast ‘real’ 35s (including the Summicron ‘King of Bokeh’) it was never my first choice (or even second) for thin DOF shots - that’s what 85s and higher are for.

Am I missing something?

Link | Posted on Dec 10, 2017 at 19:17 UTC as 55th comment | 7 replies
On article Chaos, color, and community: 10 days in India (142 comments in total)

Stunning photos Brandon, your enjoyment of the experience shines through.

And who doesn’t love a tiny monkey photo! My favourite!

Link | Posted on Dec 7, 2017 at 21:10 UTC as 31st comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

fmian: Gamechanger.. photos still look flat and lifeless compared to the output from a $250 analog camera..

Oh no - please don't invoke another Gathering of the Pedants by using 'analog' to mean film!

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2017 at 09:52 UTC

Integrating a DVD drive into the PlayStation - now THAT was a game changer.

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2017 at 07:59 UTC as 43rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Tourlou: For a technology to be a game changer, it has to be within the reach of the people. Even the best technology will be a fail if no one can afford it.

The space shuttle was a game changer, but the last time I checked eBay, the starting bid for even the oldest model was still out of my reach.

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2017 at 07:20 UTC

>>>Finally, Outex says the housing covers also have better longevity...

Hmm, mentioning the idea of housing failure - even with such a positive spin - is not exactly a good marketing strategy.

Link | Posted on Nov 3, 2017 at 21:18 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply
On article Fujifilm X-E3 Review (751 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marcin Mo111347cicki: And it's lighter than any m4/3 camera! If these trends continue, I'll have to swap systems, despite my feelings for oly and appreciaction of pana lenses.

You may want to factor in the additional weight of the lenses though. I've got Fuji and the lenses - while being fantastic - are likely to be significantly heavier than your MFT equivalent set.

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2017 at 14:17 UTC
On article What you need to know: Canon G1 X Mark III (407 comments in total)
In reply to:

vinrouge0: That leaf shutter is going to allow for some very creative flash/ambients shots but doesn't get much of a mention so far. I understand most of the negative comments but it would be a very good travel/carry around camera for most people - not videographers though.

@Hachu21, high speed flash means you can use the flash on backlit subjects (such as a portrait shot where the sun is behind the subject) in strong daylight.

Without such a flash capability, you would need to reduce the shutter speed to expose the portrait properly, which would then over-expose the background.

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2017 at 10:47 UTC
On article Nikon's official D850 lens recommendation list (308 comments in total)
In reply to:

twg: Why is 200-500 not included ??

I'm not sure, but I'll ask the person sitting next to me on my train - they might be in the Nikon lens testing team.

...nope, they're not in the team either - bad luck.

Link | Posted on Oct 13, 2017 at 18:46 UTC
In reply to:

ianp5a: And no screen on the back! That is so clever. Just like real film. So do you have to take the cartridge out and somehow develop it, before you are allowed to see what you have taken? Or maybe even send it away to a lab? Wouldn't 'that' be cool!

That'll be the Kodachrome digiFilm cartridge due out next year.

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2017 at 10:22 UTC

For even more authenticity, if you open the back without selecting the 'rewind' feature, it could reprocess the last 36 images on the sd card to look severely overexposed.

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2017 at 10:21 UTC as 77th comment
Total: 219, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »