andrewD2

What an interesting find. I'll check A7III and A7RII which should only do the CDAF confirm in AF-S. That it changes in that setting looks like a bug. I've been asking to be able to turn the CDAF ...

Please do my AWB test I linked to. Try it with a Canon, try it with a Sony. Until you do it and see it with your own eyes you will not understand what AWB is doing. Almost all will be colour ...

Most definitely not. Which metering? Highlight metering on 0EV? Spot? Matrix? You have to accept you will need EV compensation for subject reflectivity. WB is your choice in camera or in post. AWB ...

Sony AWB is not worse than others, they can be fooled for sure though, have a good look at that the WB experiment link. I did a talk pulling apart JPG vs raw and as you say, with DRO, you can get ...

The jpg differences were not small, someone could definitely have a preference. So I didn't find it pointless, knowing for example that two brands lighten reds in their jpgs is interesting, I'll ...

Magnar had a nice idea of comparing colour swatches of 6 cameras each with a jpg and raw swatch set, to see if there was a blind preference: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/64109454 He hasn't ...

Hoping for better times. Weddings postponed, business events not running, major events not running. In these times I don't see a lot of people rushing to buy a pair of R5s to upgrade their 5Diii or...

You can't do this from your post. If you open the Leica SL raw and the Fuji XT4 files you will find one has "custom" WB set, one has "as shot". You need to add 0.4EV to the Fuji and a tiny mid-tone ...

I have muddled the cameras with various numbering schemes being used in the thread. You could have pointed that out :) What I call 5 and 7 are far more similar than 7 and 11. Thanks, Andrew

You said to someone else 7 was z7 and 11 was A7III? If that is the case then with defaults my output doesn't match yours. The truth of whether the raw conversions are as far apart as you make them ...

You thought they looked very similar and no one would be able to guess. I thought they looked different and wanted to know by how much. If I was stuck with these colours out of camera and could not ...

Many are critical that even after raw processing that the colours from some cameras are very different in an unpleasing way. This proves, at least for this illuminant, that they can quickly be made ...

Eh? I'm critical of your workflow. Untagged images, raw conversions with different profiles and brightest. I'm not critical of any camera, why would I be, they look the same when you don't screw up. ...

What??? The OP is comparing apples to oranges, not using the Adobe color profile for each of the 6 raw sets. He made apples look like oranges, almost literally. I standardized them, compared apples ...

They look very different to me. The yellow patch is all over the place for example. The raw conversion of them, which you said half were, should be calibrated to some degree of accuracy. As you see ...

See my post above showing that the colours as posted by the OP ARE very different. But I have no idea how the OP got the swatches to look like that so I tried myself. A7III vs Z7, downloaded ...

Copy one patch set over the other. Make guides. Make selections aided by snapping to the guides. Create a layer mask. Make levels adjustment applied to only one layer to match white and black patches.

Good or bad??? Which have higher average deltaE or which does someone find a pretty pattern of patches? But even adjusted for brightness the hue and saturations are very different. No, you can ...

Had to assume that the OP had prepared these as sRGB image because the download from dpreview is untagged, might be a dpreview failure. If it is, know that these were assigned sRGB. Having tested ...

You might find you only get an extra 4mm anyway! Unless the Batis is a little over 40mm. The FE 35mm is narrower in FOV than the new Nikon 35mm S, Sony/Zeiss 35/1.4, Sigma art 35mm and both Canon ...