Mariusz of PL

Lives in Poland Poland
Has a website at www.marioplus.digart.pl
Joined on Jul 28, 2010
About me:

taking photos since '80s:)
1st camera - Canon ae1

Comments

Total: 19, showing: 1 – 19
On article Throwback Thursday: Minolta DiMAGE X (117 comments in total)
In reply to:

micke69: Phil Askey never understood the greatness of this camera. It and its successors (The Xg was the best) are the ultimate when you want to take pictures unnoticed. If you grab it so that only the tiny lens can be seen between the thumb and index finger, you can gently squeeze the camera to take the picture without anyone noticing anything!

That said, even though I am a (heavy) dslr user, I am more and more into GoProHero5Session for the fact you upbrought.

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2017 at 15:02 UTC

Sorry folks, but I regret to say that I disagree with this desperate call not to take train tracks photos . Even at high speed train track you are save enough to take one on condition that you do not fall asleep there. Common sense is that what you need to consider. That's it. And do not get yourself high;-) btw - water is as dangerous as train tracks, according to the author, then. Funny.

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2017 at 08:26 UTC as 141st comment | 4 replies

24mm on aps-c. Definitely. I could do with the one and nothing else.

Link | Posted on Mar 27, 2017 at 11:18 UTC as 236th comment
On article Fujifilm X-T20 Review (343 comments in total)

I see the war of formats is still in progress. I reckon there is no better or worse one. Everything depends on your needs, to cut it short, lads.

Link | Posted on Mar 22, 2017 at 11:09 UTC as 37th comment
On article Throwback Thursday: Our first cameras (391 comments in total)

Mine first was Canon ae1. First digital was Olympus D510. First dslr - Canon 450D.

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2017 at 09:06 UTC as 120th comment

Those were the times... I had prompted myself to buy Olympus 420, but I ended up with C450D then...good times past times...

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2017 at 08:42 UTC as 64th comment
On article Throwback Thursday: the Olympus C-2100UZ (122 comments in total)

My brother got it while I was still into analog Canon ae1 and saw no possibility to switch into digital. I remember he was much satisfied with 2100UZ.

Link | Posted on Mar 9, 2017 at 18:57 UTC as 45th comment

Still no DEHAZE mode in stand-alone version.

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2017 at 18:59 UTC as 21st comment | 6 replies
On article Hands-on with the Canon EOS 77D (449 comments in total)

Damn it ! Canon releases by-products instead of something which is really innovative and a step forward. Now...we are looking forward to 77D.1 or 77D/1/2... etc

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 17:43 UTC as 53rd comment | 4 replies

In 90's I never expected Panasonic to be a true gamer in photo equipment. But...it IS.

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2017 at 11:24 UTC as 11th comment | 1 reply
On article Modern Mirrorless: Canon EOS M5 Review (1635 comments in total)

I'd stick to Canon for long whatever they left behind. It is a rough company that gives me a good sense of photography, elsewhere. Should I go for M5? Not really having 70D...

Link | Posted on Dec 27, 2016 at 18:41 UTC as 47th comment
In reply to:

Aroart: Wow... hate complaining but why no 4K... even Nikon put 4K in there latest supper zoom..

I agree with utphoto; 4k is not an issue.

Link | Posted on Dec 23, 2016 at 21:13 UTC
In reply to:

Lehik: Is the "xx times outside US" a new definition for zoom length?

Ha ha that might be because of different systems of measurement in USA/Europe. Just kidding😅

Link | Posted on Dec 23, 2016 at 21:07 UTC

the size of the sensor mattered most so far. Now, it occured it does not matter! well, the ladS selling cameras in MEDIA MARKT and FOTOJOKER say so, the guys from different magazines say so, ... so I ask-what is goin' on?Why do you prize so much the camera with such a small sensor while other compact cameras using the same or simiral are gone down?

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2012 at 21:07 UTC as 33rd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

88SAL: Can buy it bundled with a EF adaptor?
So... A camera designed to target people who are upgrading from point and shoot (below entry DSLR level upgraders), a group of people notorious for not ever buying another lens that is not in the kit. The only saving grace appears to be a strong support for selling the kit 22 prime.... educating the masses on fixed focal length. Thats right, get up and walk to the Koala to take the photo.

What can you get for $800?
5N, EP3, Samsung NX200
What a Rip. Canon and Nikon both mirrorless flops.

If matching a cow with horseshoes makes it a horse?no. This camera is supposed to be used as stand-alone camera and that's it. It does not matter if it will be 1st,2nd 10th camera in family.It will serve well. Hope:) and peace not to miss the point of the thread.

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2012 at 18:47 UTC
In reply to:

GeorgeD200: No pop-up flash indicates enthusiast camera. No viewfinder indicates consumer. Split personality. Both will be problems for their intended markets. Maybe somebody can rig a small hot-shoe EVF that plugs into the HDMI cable? I know it would be awkward, but I need an EVF! Otherwise, I would be excited about this camera.

all compact cameras have NO EVF and users do take [compose frame etc]great photos.Is it the thing worth splitting hairs?:)in MY opinion NOT.

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2012 at 18:38 UTC
In reply to:

BeanyPic: I think from all the comments here that this EOS-M will be real success on the Consumer market for Canon. Great that Canon understands the market and makes high quality products for the man on the street as well as having the best Pro/ Semi Pro Kit on the market as well.
It's the way you stay number one in imaging in the world.

It is not suggested to match the market of profi. btw it has great features,depending what you expect them to be. :)

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2012 at 18:33 UTC
In reply to:

pdelux: With Only two native lenses and compatibility via adapter only for people who own Canon SLR lenses, one can only wonder if canon is trying to offer a valid alternative mirrorless option, or just trying just to stop the haemorrhaging (temporarily) of its P&S/entry-mid level DSLR customers?

Which users of SONY/ M43 /Other mirror-less formats would go back to CANON with this effort considering OMD-EM5, NEX, Samsung, Pentax offerings are already Light years ahead. I don't think anyone who doesn't have an investment in Canon lenses would even think twice about this product.

A Band Aid solution from a company that has forgotten how to INNOVATE.

99% of buyers of this camera will never ever buy another lens to match it. Those are people this camera is aimed for.And that's cool:)

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2012 at 18:30 UTC

Having read all the comments[to say MOST OF THEM:)] I want to add mine; It's ONLY the matter of price if it catches on.Now,it is too much to pay for,but if it comes down to $550 that would be acceptable.FULL STOP:)

Link | Posted on Jul 24, 2012 at 08:59 UTC as 66th comment | 2 replies
Total: 19, showing: 1 – 19