CosminMunteanu

They look way better than the OEM ones, not the mention the prices :)

This makes the EOS-M more interesting than the R :))

After you see this, no, the mirrorless FF lenses bring no size/weight advantage over the dSLR ones (there are e few, very few exceptions though)...

read it again ;)

just look as Sigma lenses for the FE Sony mount. Bigger than the dSLR versions. Just look at Nikon Z lenses. Bigger than the dSLR versions, especially the primes. No, FF mirrorless does not bring...

but no AF and no WR

if it is made in China is a chinese one. Just check it ;)

so, in fact continuous (24-30fps...) shooting will be mandatory :))
Funny to already see digital photography (almost) dead in this field.

if it is DX/APS-C, it is Fujifilm. Well done, Fujifilm! ;)

in 2018 the one stop less ISO relative to the 135 format is neglectable. Until about ISO 3200 all cameras perform almost the same, so why bother with bigger than 135 format dSLR lenses in a...

Sony has the RX1 series (35mm), Leica the Q (28mm), although none of them is weather sealed.

the camera(s) that could have been the Z or the R but did not. Not a problem, ”if you do not do it, others will”. More we will see when the actual product will hit the market. Until then: well...

the A7 (and the A9 too) is smaller that the Z (and the EOS-R) and still can do the ”twin slot” trick ;)
There is the Lumix GX800, the GX80, are not these compact enough?

@Melchiorum, you said what on my lips was :)) ... Let us remember that the 135 format was also know as the small film/frame format being used mostly by photojournalists, street photographers and...

since the M 240, the Leica M has weather sealing (not the lenses though) and many Fuji, Panasonic; Oly, etc. products also have it have (and/or IBIS too), now, while they sale at about the same...

there is no such thing as ”normal” frame size ;))

but no ”weather sealed” alternative on neither side (body/lens), or at least IBIS :(

The EF-M (47mm) is about as wide as the Sony-E (46.1 mm) and wider as the Leica-M mount (44 mm), and both last mentioned can support 35mm format sensors.

yeah, sure. Sony declared the E-mount ”open” so that more lens manufacturers can ”access” the camera (AF, exposure, etc.). Not the same can be said about the Nikon Z (not S) and Canon R (EF-R?, EOS...

I hope this lens won't be an omen like one (for the EF-M system), like the 32/1.2 was in the case of the Nikon 1 system.