csnite

I think the obvious place for an upgrade in your lineup would be either the 35 or 23 prime. I personally love the 35 f1.4, but the f2 is fantastic as well. The 23 f2 is a great little lens, ...

I see two different ways to go. Most of my photos are of people, specifically family and children. Option 1: 35 1.4, which is just a really nice lens with a good fov and great ability to separate ...

I believe that was the issue. It isn't obvious that the bracketing was on, so I eventually had to reset the shooting menu, which is not ideal, but it fixed it. Thanks.

I have two questions about the new x-t200 I picked up. First, the camera "processes" and the screen goes black after every shot. Also, it will not allow me to put it in raw+jpg. It only has fine ...

I currently use the M50 with the 22mm and 18-150, along with a few adapted lenses, but nothing exotic. I am fine with the image quality of the M50 at base ISO but coming from Fuji, find that the ...

I would consider a Canon M50. It is a great little mirrorless camera. Can be had for roughly $500.

I would also suggest looking at a Canon M50 with the 22 f2. The AF is significantly better than your em10. You gain at least a stop of high iso going to an APSC sensor over the older 16MP Olympus ...

I used to believe this as well, but if you look at the comparison linked here you will see that's not really true. Canon has done a really amazing job at focusing on small lenses. Like focal ...

I recently made a similar decision between these two systems. Here is what I would suggest. The Panasonic system is a good option. The 12-32 is a nice little lens and it gives you a longer lens. ...

There is no doubt you could be happy with either system, but three major things led me to choose an M50 over a G85 or G9. 1. Panasonic's native 4:3 format for pictures and video is less than ideal ...

It would seem like a Canon M50 would be just about perfect for you. It's in your price range, the 15-45 that comes with it may not be the greatest lens, but for vlogging it would be fine and ...

The obvious place to start would be the X-H1. Ibis, good grip, basically identical raw quality. Marginally slower AF, but you are using adapted lenses, so no big deal for you there.

You will notice a reduction in both dynamic range and high iso capability going to Fuji from the Sony. Probably 1 stop'ish. In the real world in normal photography, not a huge deal. The Fuji is ...

I am not a pro baby photographer, but I would consider the DX 35 f1.8 and 60 2.8 macro. The 35 is a good general lens with nice ability to isolate and a good field of view on your 7200. The 60 ...

I just made a similar decision and went with an M50. The panasonic system is really wonderful, but I could never come to terms with the color handling. A nice M system for most people is already ...

It sounds like you would do well with a Sony rx100 series camera. They are a little fiddly to control, but have nice zoom lenses, very small better quality than your cell phone. The Canon G series ...

It will be the compression of a 100mm lens, which is what it is. It will be "cropped" to the image circle of a 160mm lens on full frame.

I know a ton of people are going to suggest micro four thirds, and it's a very viable option. Fuji is also a great system. An xt3 and 18-55 would likely match the quality of your 17-55. I have ...

I agree with the Canon M idea, but would suggest an M50. The price is great and will work with your lenses with an inexpensive adapter. If you don't need 4k video, the M50 is great. In 4k there is ...

Fuji's are lovely. I used an X-t20 and X-t3 for a significant period of time. I would not choose an X-t20 over a gx85 for video. The video is fine, but the Gx85 is better and crucially, the X-t20 ...