tokumeino

So would I. As it, unless you use it for every keeper, it is completely irrelevent with one of the main LR pillars : the publishing services. To be useable with publishing services, the ED feature ...

IQ is clearly a con with LR. And you cannot even disable the built-in lens profiles, so you loose a lot of control over geometry (which matters much more than pixel level details). But what option ...

The strategy is perfect to me : knowing price will drop, I wait before buying. And I wait so long that after a while, GAS disappears, I don't buy the lens and I save money !

I think that no such post should come without a link to download a RAW file. Besides, the fact that parameters used with ACR are not provided aggravates the lack of replicability. I'm not ...

I completely agree. My XE3 is my first Fuji and at the time of buying, many here praised the "Kaizen". It didn't see it. There are things which are difficult to implement provided the hardware. But ...

I've bought an IXT licence because the result is not so bad, but I actually never use it, for the exact same reason I won't use the new LR feature as it currently integrates (or doesn't) in LR.

I agree. People spend hundreds of dollars on sharp lenses for improvements which are not as obvious as here. That beeing said, producing and keeping huge DNG files on my hard drive is out of ...

I think that it mainly depends on the GPU. On my i7 recent laptop but with an Nvidia MX150, it takes 45s, while it takes 15s on by ageing i5 desktop with a Nvidia 1060.

I think that ultimately, it comes to a matter of taste as much as "science". I personally dislike heavy sharpening and prefer a residual capture sharpening (because we are only talking about ...

I have a JPEGMini licence so I'm using it. And it is great. But all it does in my understanding is analysing each picture and then automatically choosing a quality. But at the end it is still a ...

45 sec here for a 24MP Fuji raw file. And the DNG is 2-3 times larger than the RAW file. Laptop with i7-8565u and a modest MX150 GPU (yet much better than integrated graphics) which is used for ...

On my recent laptop (i7-8565u 16GB MX150) it takes 45s and leaves a 125MB file on my SSD, which is 2TB so without a large margin to upgrade. It offers something else but doen't solvd the issue. It ...

That would be such a negative attitude :-) Your input is actually interesting. Basically, Sensei, Deep Learning and such are mostly marketing. And the algorithms they use seem pretty regular and ...

Why not only adding a checkbox somewhere, enabling the new file production in a cache folder, leaving no trace after export, or proofing ? I don't care about a new DNG file and I don't have room ...

I couldn't see the reference to ML in the OP's post but I didn't read the whole thread for another capture. AI in general is currently often a marketing feature hiding good'ol tech or very ...

With such low radius values, don't you think that you increase he watercolor effect ? During my experiments to find acceptable defauly sharpening presets, I've tried - with a variety of pictures - ...

Is there a way, like in DXO prime, to tick a box so that the "enhanced" process simply involves a temp file during rendering, but without the need to store it permanently as with IXT for instance. ...

Indeed. Your values remain all low (not reaching 80+ for detail typically) so it sounds nice to me. Do you keep a low radius ?

What would be your advice ? I mean, within Lightroom ? What are the typical values you use as a starting point ?

I fully agree, Jerry. And in other occasions, I used to disagree with people, always gently doing my best to understand the other and trying to improve. Because to debate, you need to listen just ...