bflood

I have a suggestion. Notice the double image that you can see in the Ford logo. I have the old Nikon 80-400D with Nikon's original VR (their image stabilization). I got lots of images like this ...

I think the recommendations for the two zooms is good. And you've gotten some good advice on places. But let me add a little based on living here in LV for a couple of decades. I don't think you ...

I am usually content to view images posted here at the size they appear in the thread, but I will infrequently select the "original size" option. For your shots, I expanded my browser to use the ...

Over my many years I've seen a lot of "La Jolla sunset" photos, but the first one of yours is hands down the best I've seen.

Nice work, Mr. Gebauer. Like the others, I agree with your assessment of Copenhagen. My wife and I spent several days there in 2017 before departing on a 14 day cruise to celebrate our 50th. It is ...

My process is the same whether a single image or a multi-image project like a stack or panoramic - I open the raw file and save my initial result in tif format (lossless, unlike jpg), and only ...

Impressive image, especially at max focal length. The image was shot at ISO 100, where the image noise should be good, and it is. How about shooting at ISO800 or 1600? I'd love to see what it does ...

I added my D610 to my D7000 several years ago, and it has been every bit the satisfying change I expected. I have kept my D7000 and still use it when carrying 2 cameras is beneficial (like being ...

I bet you have a jackalope, too, and your snipe got away, right? I second the suggestion to ditch the 18-300. The wider the zoom range, the more compromised the optics have to be. In general zooms ...

I respectfully disagree with CptAmerica, too. The OP is looking for the advice of D850 owners, not the fans of any particular computer. The computer forums are divided, one for PC-types and one ...

In addition to the 2-button reset, I recommend you check to see what version of the Nikon software each body has. Different versions bring opportunities for the image processing to be different, ...

Check your own shooting experience - is it common for you to be frustrated because you can't shoot wider than 24 mm? If yes, then you'll miss the wider option on your trip just like you have so ...

I like #1, also. No need to identify the location, though - the Chrysler Building is a dead giveaway.

I think that Mr. Craig (can I call you Phoenix?) has nailed this subject very well. A fundamental truth about shooting wildlife. 400 isn't long enough, either, and neither is 600. And so it goes. M ...

Perhaps it's just my aging eyesight, but the camera on top sure looks to be physically larger than the one on the bottom. Is that a distortion from the relative positioning of the two? Ways to show ...

The amount of rain in this case is unremarkable - about 1 inch total in about 1 hour. But the reality is that most of the rain, about 0.6 inches, fell in about 15 minutes. The flooding is more the ...

I agree with stonesfan that the 16-85 would be a good choice. Those extra 2 mm on the wide end really make a difference. However, the f3.5-5.6 isn't any help over your 18-140 for low light. From ...

If the AF-S 300 f4D isn't the very first AF-S lens from Nikon, it was one of the first. As such, it has the earliest "Revision 0" of the AF-S technology. So I suspect the 300D offers the slowest ...

The 500 and the 1.4X for wildlife are obvious, and the 70-200 will be very nice for the rodeo. Your 24-70 will give you a very versatile range for landscapes and handle low light, too. I use a ...

This will go a long way toward maintaining and/or improving your skills so you are prepared when it's time to assume your Grandpa duties.