xpanded

Lives in Europe
Joined on Aug 31, 2010

Comments

Total: 79, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »

Ove - is it too late to rename it Erna instead of X1D?

Link | Posted on Jun 27, 2016 at 17:56 UTC as 58th comment

Thank you.

Link | Posted on Jun 24, 2016 at 20:18 UTC as 173rd comment

Aggressive pricing - good luck Sigma - I hope you will sell heaps.

Link | Posted on Jun 24, 2016 at 06:02 UTC as 71st comment
On article Beta: try out our new 'light' color scheme (722 comments in total)

Exactly what is needed - hope it will get into production. Thanks a lot.

Link | Posted on Apr 6, 2016 at 20:37 UTC as 333rd comment
On article DPReview is hiring! Software development manager (109 comments in total)
In reply to:

xpanded: "Must be able to change the black background to white".

It is a long standing joke back to the time when the site was created. As to the office monitors they are thus because you are expected to work ;-)

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2016 at 17:05 UTC
On article DPReview is hiring! Software development manager (109 comments in total)

"Must be able to change the black background to white".

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2016 at 20:50 UTC as 9th comment | 2 replies

Dear Sigma - congratulations with this amazing launch. Quite surprised you managed both so quickly.

Now please hire 2 software guys (m/f) - one skilled tester and one skilled bug fixer. Do not add additional features to the software - do not work to make it faster - only focus on making it 100% stable. No more strange error messages. SSP remains the biggest hindrance for bigger sales.

And yes, I do own Sigma cameras (currently 5) and I would buy this in a heartbeat if the raw converter was fixed once and for all.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 19:15 UTC as 174th comment | 3 replies
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2605 comments in total)

Dear Ricoh - please put this sensor into a full frame GR (and fix the dust problems at the same time) and I will buy.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 08:05 UTC as 515th comment
On article Going Pro: We interview Fujifilm execs in Tokyo (354 comments in total)
In reply to:

xpanded: GA645ziD please. f:4.0 is fine. Please make it in black so it is easy to distinguish from the (standard) film version. Would appreciate it very much if you would use a standard Bayer sensor. 50 megapixels is fine. Thanks in advance.

Yes - they were(are) indeed wonderful cameras. I still use mine on occasion.

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2016 at 18:50 UTC
On article Going Pro: We interview Fujifilm execs in Tokyo (354 comments in total)

GA645ziD please. f:4.0 is fine. Please make it in black so it is easy to distinguish from the (standard) film version. Would appreciate it very much if you would use a standard Bayer sensor. 50 megapixels is fine. Thanks in advance.

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2016 at 16:34 UTC as 39th comment | 1 reply
On article Sony Cyber-shot RX1R II added to studio test scene (209 comments in total)

"The Sony RX1R II is the kind of camera that turns heads."

Wrong. That titel goes to the Sigma Quattro series sharply followed by Hasselblad's rebadged Sonys.

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2015 at 18:35 UTC as 66th comment | 1 reply
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2159 comments in total)

DPReview 4 Nov 2015: "But do these technologies add up to performance that can compare to the best of the a7R II's DSLR competition? In some ways, yes, but overall, no."

DPReview 17 Nov 2015: "...the a7R II offers excellent autofocus".

The 4 Nov article seems to have slipped your mind. May I suggest you either modify the 4 Nov article or this review for a consistent message. Thanks in advance.

Link | Posted on Nov 17, 2015 at 17:01 UTC as 247th comment | 2 replies
On article Sony Europe introduces a68 SLT with 79-point AF module (306 comments in total)

"even in lighting as low as EV-2 where other cameras struggle"

Benchmark is -4 EV now so why on Earth does Sony write this?

Too little, too late.

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2015 at 07:31 UTC as 33rd comment | 5 replies
On article Video: What's in the future for Sony's Alpha system? (269 comments in total)
In reply to:

Glenn Barber: Another Beef - why did you perpetuate the confusion that we asked for an uncompressed raw. Everyone who knew what they were talking about in the forums in DPreview said that we wanted LOSSLESS RAW - and preferably compressed.

@Rishi Sanyal - maybe this was addressed off camera or maybe I missed it in the interview. When will Sony bring uncompressed raw to all the people who made the A7-series viable (i.e. all A7 mark 1 buyers) as well as the A7II? If you did not ask him on/off camera why not? The continued support to existing customers is far more important than the very latest tech advance. Thanks for replying. EDIT: Typo

Link | Posted on Oct 27, 2015 at 08:54 UTC
On article Video: What's in the future for Sony's Alpha system? (269 comments in total)

I think I missed it. When did he promise that A7, A7R, A7S and A7II users would get uncompressed raw?

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2015 at 16:59 UTC as 44th comment
On article Adobe issues Lightroom 6.2 apology and update (230 comments in total)
In reply to:

Silverback46: I thought the world was supposed to end when the blood moon happened? Truly this is the sign we were waiting for...

There was a bug in the Blood Moon software though, so it will only happen if and when that is fixed...

Link | Posted on Oct 12, 2015 at 18:56 UTC
On article Adobe issues Lightroom 6.2 apology and update (230 comments in total)
In reply to:

Snikt228: But they didn't actually fix the major bugs with this "fix" release?

Does anyone's Synchronize folders feature work?

Never got the bug fix to actually work. Reinstalled LR 6.1 from backup. A big sigh of relief as all my photos were still there.

Link | Posted on Oct 12, 2015 at 18:54 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2159 comments in total)

Sony should hire Shakin' Stevens as a poster boy for the A7-line:

"You just have to shake fast to counter the shutter shock".

Fortunately Sony will probably soon change mount again.

Link | Posted on Sep 25, 2015 at 09:32 UTC as 393rd comment | 8 replies
On article Capture One Pro 8 software review (317 comments in total)
In reply to:

SmilerGrogan: The bottom line with this software is that photos processed with it have a distinct look that is used by many of the world's most highly paid professionals. So if you want that "professional" look, you need to switch to Capture One.

You said there was not one and there is. That is not smartass - that is the truth. Hard to handle?

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2015 at 14:53 UTC
On article Capture One Pro 8 software review (317 comments in total)
In reply to:

SmilerGrogan: The bottom line with this software is that photos processed with it have a distinct look that is used by many of the world's most highly paid professionals. So if you want that "professional" look, you need to switch to Capture One.

Let me name just one to render your statement false: run as a perpetual non subscription software.

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2015 at 14:41 UTC
Total: 79, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »