Felts

Joined on Jun 7, 2012

Comments

Total: 109, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article CP+ 2017: Ricoh teases upcoming D FA* 50mm F1.4 (38 comments in total)

No wide angle prime?! :(

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2017 at 19:55 UTC as 1st comment

Please can we not have another discussion on what constitues a graphic image? Thank you most kindly...

Link | Posted on Feb 14, 2017 at 21:58 UTC as 59th comment | 1 reply
On article Prime or zoom? LensRentals investigates (232 comments in total)

Great article, thanks for the link... says the photographer who shoots primes ;)

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2017 at 09:52 UTC as 78th comment
On article Stunning time-lapse captures the seasons of Norway (65 comments in total)

Totally wonderful...

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2017 at 22:48 UTC as 4th comment
In reply to:

paulski66: This has been one of my favorite Nikkors since it first came out. In fact, within weeks of buying my copy, I sold my 18-35 AF-S; as much as I liked the zoom, it simply couldn't compete with the speed, brilliant colors, and beautiful oof rendering of the 20mm f/1.8g.

Personally, I don't think this lens gets the credit or attention it deserves.

Khizer... I found my copy didn't focus well either. Never fell in love with it as I thought I would (and at the time I was a 20 fiend). In fact this lens probably ended the love affair between me and that focal length!!

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2017 at 06:50 UTC

Too easy to pirate the film presets... And because they are frankly too expensive for what they do this does not surprise me. A LR preset needs to be a few dollars/pounds/euros. Not 100+ especially when these film 'emulsions' are free on phones!!!!! Think about it VSCO...

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2017 at 00:05 UTC as 4th comment

Wow...

Link | Posted on Jan 1, 2017 at 19:02 UTC as 32nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Scottelly: Why does it say "Warning: Graphic Image" in red on the black rectangle, where the image should be? I mean this is in no way a graphic image. There is no blood, no nudity, no violence - just a guy standing with a gun and another guy laying on the ground.

Is this just sensationalism?

Was the photo of the little refugee washed up on the beach graphic? No blood, no bullet holes, he was just lying on his front... but that was most certainly graphic, shocking and desperately sad. Why is this image *any* different, a few seconds after a murder has taken place?

Link | Posted on Dec 21, 2016 at 22:34 UTC
In reply to:

Scottelly: Why does it say "Warning: Graphic Image" in red on the black rectangle, where the image should be? I mean this is in no way a graphic image. There is no blood, no nudity, no violence - just a guy standing with a gun and another guy laying on the ground.

Is this just sensationalism?

Sorry Scottelly, but your disregard for human life actually leaves me feeling sick. I can only assume you do not know the background story?

Link | Posted on Dec 21, 2016 at 16:15 UTC
On article 2016 Roundup: $1200-2000 ILCs part 2: Full-Frame (368 comments in total)
In reply to:

quietrich: Although these roundups are useful as an overview of current cameras in a particular class/budget, I suspect the 'which camera should I buy' conclusion is click bait. The answer to that question should always be the same simple one, that you should buy the camera that best suits the work you do, and feels most intuitive to you. Any other answer is just baseless generalising.

I agree absolutely!! The K1 only receiving a silver is *for me* laughable as I will never shoot video or use continuous AF... but as a complete package this may be about right.
However, it renders the overall scores useless... unless you shoot a bit of everything!

Link | Posted on Dec 9, 2016 at 19:33 UTC

All amazing... And I'm a fussy sod who isn't easily pleased...

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2016 at 10:15 UTC as 18th comment
On article Sigma 12-24mm F4 DG HSM Art real world sample gallery (217 comments in total)
In reply to:

Paul B Jones: Canon has a similar lens - but it goes to 11!

It's one louder...

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2016 at 20:14 UTC
On article Abandoned America: Photographing a forgotten history (76 comments in total)
In reply to:

HRC2016: I condone photography done where a photographer did not have permission from the property owner.

Photographers who break the law are criminals, and no "code of conduct" gets them off the hook. They are not much different from those who go off-trail or off-road to get a unique angle.

People who photograph someone's property without permission are not much different from those who use another's photograph without permission. As photographers we should respect everyone's rights. Not just when it's convenient.
Trespassers cause many problems, including more fences and signs that detract from the landscape.

I don't know how much of what I've stated applies to these photos/photographer as I'm not giving this genre my attention other than to show it is not all positive.

Trespassing in the UK isn't a criminal act unless you break and enter... hence 'code of conduct'. Might be different elsewhere, but here I'm no criminal!!

Link | Posted on Oct 2, 2016 at 18:11 UTC
On article Abandoned America: Photographing a forgotten history (76 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photomonkey: More decay images. Yay!
Glad to see the hipster schtick is still popular.

Ha! On this site it tends to be the dull 'place tripod here' landscape imagery, so surely it's good to see something a little off piste on DPR?!

Link | Posted on Oct 2, 2016 at 00:08 UTC
On article Abandoned America: Photographing a forgotten history (76 comments in total)

As someone who loves to go 'Urbexing' (Urban Exploration), I fail to see how this is a 'voyeuristic act'. The unwritten rule of Urbexing (at least in the UK) is that you 'leave no trace' whilst appreciating the faded grandeur of the site you hope to gain access to. I see myself as a privileged photojournalist, often documenting the beauty of the last breaths of a building prior to its imminent demolition.

Link | Posted on Oct 2, 2016 at 00:03 UTC as 18th comment
In reply to:

4agze: Over saturated and HDR'ish shadow lifting images, I'll be surprised if Sony or Nikon doesn't win this :D

That the judges have exceptionally poor taste...

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2016 at 08:03 UTC
On article Samyang introduces full-frame 20mm F1.8 ED AS UMC (159 comments in total)
In reply to:

mario loconte: No autofocus, what's the point

If we were looking at 85mm you'd have a point... but at 20mm your comments are not really valid.

Link | Posted on Aug 15, 2016 at 19:58 UTC
On article Samyang introduces full-frame 20mm F1.8 ED AS UMC (159 comments in total)
In reply to:

mario loconte: No autofocus, what's the point

Using DOF calculator... FF 20mm @ f1.8

If your subject is 10 feet away then anything between 7.12 ft and 16.8 is in focus!! Who needs AF did you say??

Link | Posted on Aug 11, 2016 at 18:10 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 Review (2189 comments in total)
In reply to:

Light Pilgrim: I was waiting for 2 years for this camera, but for some reason I am not over the moon. It is nice, for sure. I need to see the quality of RAW files and will decide based on IQ. Why folks are so excited about the joystick? I have in Canon for many years

The RAWs will be the same as the XPro2 surely?

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 21:17 UTC
On article Pentax K-1 real-world sample gallery (145 comments in total)
In reply to:

marc petzold: The sad thing is, in 5 to 6 years ppl came out, claiming that the K-1 is vintage and ancient tech, and one can't make decent images with it...

I hope the best for Pentax, that their K-1 would outsell the D8x0, and they'd develop an semipro level FF (24 MP) with the same features, to compete with the D750 & 5D Mk. III(IV then later)

Pentax truly deserved it, their K-1 gets the most out of this 36 MP Sony FF Sensor tech from 2012. Togehter with their unique features, and much cheaper price compared to the D810, the K-1 should being accepted onto the market very well - if one isn't already onto the Nikon train.

Roland - I've been curtly informed by someone here on the Fuji forum that the original X100 wasn't up to the job of imagemaking anymore and more recent iterations had what it takes to make a good picture... You and I know thats not true, but for some, cameras stop working once a newer model has been released!! :)

Link | Posted on Jul 2, 2016 at 15:02 UTC
Total: 109, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »