seahawk

One lens, simply because on holidays there will be days when the camera stays at the hotel. I do not need it when going to the beach or to the shopping centre. Furthermore I go hiking during the ...

If you order at a Nikon certified retailer you wait a few weeks for a D850 and only a few days for the batteries in the worst case. Most often they have both items in stock or ready within days.

The cost will most likely not produce so much improvement that it is worthwhile, especially as many advantages of the D850 (better AF higher FPS) will hardly matter to you.

I use the 18-300DX 1:3,5-6,3 VR as a holiday lens on the D300 but also used it for events on a D7200. If you aware of the limitations of a superzoom, it works just fine. Which means it will most ...

My main holiday camera. It is tough, the AF is good, it is fast and with a superzoom attached it can do nearly everything. And if somebody steals it, it is not that bad.

It is not 2%, it is 225% as that is a amount of extra light the bigger sensors gets. Surely each sensor is different and even when using sensors with higher pixel density an increased sensitivity ...

Then I simply do not understand you and why we spent countless posts on working out a difference, for which we seem to agree, that it will not matter in a significant way for the thread starter.

If you are invested in one lens system you buy the bodies that work best for you in that system. Switching between Canon and Nikon never made much sense in the last 30 years.

So you mean that the thread starter, who currently has a DX wide angle lens and does not want to spent more then 1500$ on his new system would be in the group for whom the difference is of utmost ...

Well, I think we have to disagree on what is practical advice and what is not.

That are the SNR measurements by DXo - the D7200 at ISO100 scores slightly higher than the D750 at ISO 200, so obviously it is better than the theoretical ISO225 you claim, unless you want to ...

DXo measures 37,6 for the D7200 at ISO100 and 37,1 for the D750 at ISO 200, So it iahrd to see how it should be ISO225. But maybe it is the same as the huge advantage in dynamic range that you have ...

More like ISO 185 on a D750, but anyway. The question is, if SNR is the most pressing criteria of a sensor, especially if he used to shoot film before.

Yes, it does. A ISO100 D7200 shot is about a ISO145 D750 shot, the question is if it is worth the double price and at what print size the difference becomes obvious. So you are technical right, I ...

I would suggest the original poster takes a look at the D7200 review and comes to his own conclusion: https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikon-d7200/12

As an experienced photographer I would tend to do exposure bracketing and then merge the shots in editing instead of pulling up the shadows.

We are talking D750 vs. D7200 at ISO100, not a general observation.

I understand the technology behind it, thank you. But sensor measurement does not create a photo, for that you need to look at the output device. And nearly no screen and no printer will be able ...

For me it is simple. Second best AF system + consumer body + probably one step down in the metering sensor -> top of the line prosumer body Just like the D7500 replaces the D7200, although I think ...

That is what I would call a D750 successor. Regardless of the name Nikon comes up with.