seahawk

In the end you need to enjoy the process of taking a photo to warrant the purchase of better cameras and the time spent on learning how to use those cameras properly. If you do not enjoy it, you...

In the end most people just want to have a picture with quality being secondary and the knowledge on how to achieve a good picture being of no interest to them.
For a photographer the photo is the...

Some people just want pictures will move to the smartphone, people who enjoy to take photos will stay with a camera.

In the end it will depend on what Nikon wants to achieve. If they want to re-take market share from Sony and Nikon the price should be closer to $3000, if they just want to milk their existing ...

I am ready to buy it, but only after the reviews and after 6-9 months in the hands of real users. I am not pre-ordering any Nikon any more.

First it helps to find photos in databases by tagging them and then many websites demand a text describing the image so that blind people can have the description of the pic. If you are used to ...

For such travels I use the 18-300VR on a D300S, which also works quite well. I personally would consider a D7200 instead of the D7500 as the better AF is probably not as important for your needs ...

I got mine as a walk around lens and I am impressed with the performance. There is nothing bad with the lens, if you consider that it is a superzoom. Not that wide for landscapes or architecture, ...

In then end it depends on what Nikon wants. If they want to increase to margin for each body sold, than 4000$ and up is likely. If they want to preserve their current market share and entice ...

Hard to say, if you look at the specs, they could go as high as 4499$ but if you they want to protect and regain market share, I think 2999-3299$ would be a wise move. 2999$ would be aggressive ...

If you mean the 3 lenses I could not do without, it turned out to be some surprising choices which are used most, although I own the old trinity of 2.8D lenses 1. AF-S 80-400VR - has become my go ...

45MP, D5 AF, 4-5FPS FF and 8-9FPS in DX crop with 6-7FPS in 1.2crop.

KInd of a high resolution camera with a D500 built into it. And maybe not go above 4000$ with the price.

I use RAW when it counts, but for private hobby shots I use jpg, simply because using JPG keeps my skills sharp. Exposure white balance and such need to be good in camera and good when the pic is ...

In the end this is the same as the arrival of the first SLRs with an AF system, the first DSLRs and so on. There were always people saying that the new technology will never dominate the market.

The future has arrived. Time to dump the DLSR systems.

The D810 AF is bit old and the D820 will have a bit too much resolution. Imho I would wait to see what a D750 successor brings.

After the problems with the D600 I doubt Nikon wants to use that number again for the moment. D750 has a much more positive image. And the D750 is exactly the camera you describe at the moment. I ...

Yes, I still have the 80-200 2.8D, 35-70mm 2.8D, 300mm 2.8D and 20mm 2.8D in use. Not quite as good as the latest version, but still good enough imho.

If you are not invested in FX Nikon lenses, pick the camera you like more. Maybe even take a look Sony and the morrirless options.

Imho no. From button placement over AF module to body quality the closest similar camera is the D7100/D7200.