donaldsc

Lives in United States Las Vegas, NV, United States
Works as a retired chemist
Joined on Jan 12, 2006

Comments

Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4

If they are private streets, they can control access to the streets. If they are public streets, nobody can stop having the kids in the neighborhood wear gaudy t-shirts with politically incorrect or obscene slogans from parading in front of the camera and interfering with the photo shoot. The homeowners or the HOA could even pay the kids to do it. Also, if the photographers go on private property, nobody can interfere w the homeowners turning on their sprinkler systems with the spray directed onto the public sidewalks.

One of the respondents suggested using drones to interfere w the photographers. Love that idea.

A wildlife propane cannon - https://www.amazon.com/WCS-Guardian-2-Propane-Cannon-Telescoping/dp/B01N47G0W4/ref=pd_lpo_sbs_86_t_0?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=GD2GF3GR0KN21955RX7X - would also work.

Link | Posted on Dec 25, 2017 at 19:19 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply
On article Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Review (89 comments in total)

I do not own the product so I am commenting on the basis of the review only. To me, it sounds like a totally crappy camera attached to a non-phone. However, I guess that the social media types who buy these sort of things are incapable of and are uninterested in knowing anything about photography and are only capable and/or interested in taking selfies of themselves blocking whatever object they are standing in front of. To them, it will probably be a great product.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2015 at 19:02 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply
On article App Review: Pixlr-o-matic for Android (5 comments in total)

Seems like all that this ap does is to take lousy photographs and make them even worse. In my opinion, it is worthless junk.

Link | Posted on Mar 3, 2013 at 18:30 UTC as 2nd comment
Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4