marike6

Joined on Jul 29, 2011

Comments

Total: 2867, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
On article Gear of the Year 2016 - Barney's choice: Nikon D500 (217 comments in total)
In reply to:

david vella: No DX Nikon fast glass and way too late,
DSLR era as mainstream format is over .

@david vella DSLR era is over why, because so many more pros and enthusiasts use baby mirrorless cameras with big lenses hanging off the front? Wait.

For crying out loud some mirrorless fans are hilarious. Shoot whatever camera you want and stop being so insecure about your gear choices. DSLRs continue to be the #1 choice worldwide for working pros and enthusiasts. By the way, any Sony fan critical of Nikon's lack of lenses should be ignored.

Link | Posted on Dec 19, 2016 at 13:44 UTC
On article Gear of the Year 2016 - Barney's choice: Nikon D500 (217 comments in total)
In reply to:

tom1234567: Fuji beats it for AF but not buffer but then you get more keepers using Fuji
simple
watch the unbiased reviews
I'm a D7200 owner and a Fuji X-T2 owner and I love both my friend uses the D500 which I have used on occasions
Tom G

Good thing Fujifilm makes all those great telephotos for sports and wildlife shooters. ;-)

Link | Posted on Dec 19, 2016 at 13:35 UTC
On article Action-packed: Sony a6500 review (1128 comments in total)

Nice body, but I think Sony is kind of neglecting their crop sensor lens lineup. Over the holidays I was considering buying an A6000 on special, but since I'm not a fan of the 16-50 kit lens, I had to start thinking about a replacement. Sigma 30 f/1.4? Samyang 16 f2? Anyway, it's kind of slim pickings on the crop side of Sony. Either you are paying big bucks for FE Zeiss lenses, or looking at third party manual focus lenses like the Samyangs. Anyway, I gave up. But I did like the feel of the A6500 body when I checked it out briefly at B&H.

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2016 at 11:19 UTC as 62nd comment | 12 replies
On article Got Bokeh? DxO reviews the Nikkor AF-S 105mm F1.4E ED (140 comments in total)
In reply to:

stevo23: Wide open bokeh looks fine - smooth and no doubling. The cat's eye shape that shows up in the second image at 2.2 is not distracting and while not the ideal shape, everything else looks fine. Where does one get the masters degree in bokeh judging? I want that qualification.

This lens appears to be quite remarkable. I just wonder why Nikon have chosen not to update the old 105 2.5 that was such a venerable workhorse in the film era. It would have been a superb and reasonably priced lens. All the hopes and aspirations of the past 30 years have landed on yet another $2000+ lens.

The cat's eye thing is a function of the vignetting, it found on nearly all large aperture lenses, the Sigma Art 85mm has the same thing. It's because of vignetting on FF. Closer to the center bokeh balls will appear perfectly round on the 105mm f/1.4.

http://www.lenstip.com/492.7-Lens_review-Nikon_Nikkor_AF-S_105_mm_f_1.4E_ED_Coma__astigmatism_and_bokeh.html

http://www.lenstip.com/491.7-Lens_review-Sigma_A_85_mm_f_1.4_DG_HSM_Coma__astigmatism_and_bokeh.html

Link | Posted on Dec 14, 2016 at 23:33 UTC
On article Got Bokeh? DxO reviews the Nikkor AF-S 105mm F1.4E ED (140 comments in total)

Zeiss Otus 85mm optical quality (or slightly better if you go by Lenstip) with blazing fast AF for half the price of the Otus? Sounds good to me. With this lens Nikon has proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are still one of the best optics makers in the world.

Link | Posted on Dec 14, 2016 at 23:28 UTC as 11th comment
On article Got Bokeh? DxO reviews the Nikkor AF-S 105mm F1.4E ED (140 comments in total)
In reply to:

PanoMax: Nikkor makes some fine lenses.
This is why Sigma produces superior lenses. Their Art lenses such as the 85mm 1.4 would be a good example to compare with.
https://www.dpreview.com/products/sigma/lenses/sigma_85_1p4_dg_hsm_a

The Nikon 105 f/1.4 is equal or better optically than the Sigma Art 85 f/1.4, Zeiss Otus, Zeiss Milvus. See Lenstip, they reviewed all four lenses,

http://www.lenstip.com/492.11-Lens_review-Nikon_Nikkor_AF-S_105_mm_f_1.4E_ED_Summary.html

Link | Posted on Dec 14, 2016 at 22:56 UTC
On article Action-packed: Sony a6500 review (1128 comments in total)
In reply to:

Daft Punk: Nice camera.

It is disappointing however that is does not seem to have moved the game on from the Samsung NX1, which is nearly two years older and performed better in many respects.

Samsung were utterly mad to throw it all in the bin. They could have sold the tech on to Canikon. If the NX1 had a Nikon or Canon badge on it, it would dominate the mirrorless market.

@Fujica Too bad for your theory that Canon and Nikon are #1 and #2 in overall camera sales, #1 and #2 in DSLRs, #1 and #2 in compacts, #1 and #2 for lenses sold with Sigma third. For mirrorless, Olympus easily beat Sony on BCN camera rankings with Canon #3. Look at Amazon rankings, BCN camera rankings, whatever, you'll see Canon, Nikon and the rest.

http://photorumors.com/2016/01/27/2016-bcn-camera-rankings-are-out/

Link | Posted on Dec 14, 2016 at 22:05 UTC
In reply to:

marike6: The Zeiss Otus and Milvus 85mm lenses, and those from Canikon just got their clock's cleaned by Sigma's optical engineers (again) as the Sigma 85 f/1.4 DG HSM Art is the new king of the 85mm portraits.

@jossee lol, you've got to be kidding, nobody was insulting anyone here until you came along patting yourself on the back with "real photographers don't care about lens tests" lol, which is what you say when a competitor lens tests better than your brand lens. ;) But the point is this is a Sigma lens article, if it bothers you so much when others mention positive reviews of the gear in question, don't read it.

But making up things like "harsh bokeh" when these samples actually show the bokeh to be extremely smooth and creamy is "pathetic", to use your word. But time to move on and get over it.

Link | Posted on Dec 14, 2016 at 11:27 UTC
In reply to:

marike6: The Zeiss Otus and Milvus 85mm lenses, and those from Canikon just got their clock's cleaned by Sigma's optical engineers (again) as the Sigma 85 f/1.4 DG HSM Art is the new king of the 85mm portraits.

@josseee
It's pretty obvious that I was yanking Damian's chain and I never use the phrase you claimed I did. As opposed to you who came late to this thread all butt injured because the Sony lens got outperformed on Lenstip talking about "real photographers don't care about lens tests" or some such nonsense. And by the way, I'm quite sure that Damain doesn't need you to stick up for him.

@DamianFI
Nobody said the Sony is not a good lens, but according to the Lenstest, the Sigma is sharper in the center and borders. The Sigma's is an extremely even lens whereas the Sony has a much wider gap between the center and borders, so it's actually the Sigma that performs better in terms of uniformity. But whatever, I'd take the stellar Nikon 105 f/1.4 over either the Sony, Sigma or Zeiss 85. :-) Cheers, time to move on.

Link | Posted on Dec 11, 2016 at 13:45 UTC
In reply to:

marike6: The Zeiss Otus and Milvus 85mm lenses, and those from Canikon just got their clock's cleaned by Sigma's optical engineers (again) as the Sigma 85 f/1.4 DG HSM Art is the new king of the 85mm portraits.

@josseee
I did not call Damian a "delusional fanboy", I never used that phrase, stop making things up.
https://www.dpreview.com/news/5149714467/it-s-finally-here-sigma-85mm-f1-4-dg-hsm-art-sample-gallery?comment=5140921662

And no I didn't twist anything toward sharpness, sharpness is not the only area that the Sigma 85 bests the Sony 85 GM according to the Lenstip review referenced above. But whatever, time for you guys to let it go. ;-)

Link | Posted on Dec 10, 2016 at 14:56 UTC
On article Gear of the Year: Carey's choice - Canon PowerShot G9 X (212 comments in total)
In reply to:

marike6: Nice camera for sure, but personally I don't get the obsession with small size, especially when it means losing vital features like a viewfinder, a bright lens, and a good feel in the hand.

@Carey Rose I agree about the texture, it does make a difference. The RX100 always felt frustratingly insecure in my hand, my preference is a grippy camera like the Ricoh GR or at least something with a ridge on front like the S100 or P330. Thanks for putting the G9X on my radar, it seems to be a well done camera that is significantly more affordable than the RX100 V.

Link | Posted on Dec 5, 2016 at 21:53 UTC
On article Gear of the Year: Carey's choice - Canon PowerShot G9 X (212 comments in total)
In reply to:

Altruisto: I like G9x size. I happen to own a Sony RX100 mk3 but never have it on me because it's less pocketable. I use instead my Canon S110. My Samsung S7 has no reach, and my RX100 is in my bag. Only the S110 is always in my pocket. I'm impressed with lens quality for such a narrow body, limited flare, acceptable corners, no bleeding at night ... even if my RX100 seems sharper. I think the g9x is going to be my next.purchase.

http://camerasize.com/compare/#332,636

There is only 5mm difference in depth between the RX100 and G9X. Maybe it's cheaper to buy a baggier pair of jeans than a whole new camera?

Link | Posted on Dec 5, 2016 at 17:33 UTC
On article Gear of the Year: Carey's choice - Canon PowerShot G9 X (212 comments in total)
In reply to:

marike6: Nice camera for sure, but personally I don't get the obsession with small size, especially when it means losing vital features like a viewfinder, a bright lens, and a good feel in the hand.

When there are entire websites dedicated solely to camera size
http://camerasize.com/compare/#332,636 clearly it's an obsession for users and the industry. IMO, when users are talking about a few millimeters in depth as the reason to prefer the G9X over the RX100 (probably a better camera in many ways and less expensive if you get the earlier version) it seems extreme. Jeans pocketability might be a thing but I'm beginning to think that camera size is just another way for enthusiasts (and vendors) to justify the need for 4 or 5 cameras. "There's my DSLR for serious work, my m43 camera for travel, my RX100 for 4K video / hiking and my S110 because it fits in my pocket better than my RX100". I'm sure everybody here has read exactly this kind of size related obsessive behavior. Not a big deal but how is it not an obsession when people are harping on a mere 10 millimeters of difference?

Link | Posted on Dec 5, 2016 at 17:22 UTC
On article Gear of the Year: Carey's choice - Canon PowerShot G9 X (212 comments in total)
In reply to:

marike6: Nice camera for sure, but personally I don't get the obsession with small size, especially when it means losing vital features like a viewfinder, a bright lens, and a good feel in the hand.

I understand the theory behind compacts, no explanation is necessary, the point is it becomes an obsession when you already have the absolutely tiny RX100, LX100, et al. For me a few millimeters extra thinness at the expense of a brighter lens or eye level VF is not at all worth to me, especially since the smaller you go the less fun a camera is to use, the more it becomes like holding a slippery bar of hotel size soap in a public shower. ;-) Having owned tons of compacts, my preference is one that's a good compromise between size, usability and IQ. Since I never hold my cameras in my lint filled jeans pockets (cameras are dust magnets) or my "skinny jeans" (something the reviewer said without the slightest hint of irony), I never worry about the few extra millimeters of depth or width because my compact will be carried in a small bag or waste-pack anyway. Cheers.

Link | Posted on Dec 5, 2016 at 16:03 UTC
On article Gear of the Year: Carey's choice - Canon PowerShot G9 X (212 comments in total)

Nice camera for sure, but personally I don't get the obsession with small size, especially when it means losing vital features like a viewfinder, a bright lens, and a good feel in the hand.

Link | Posted on Dec 5, 2016 at 13:47 UTC as 49th comment | 8 replies
On article Fujifilm launches X-A10 as entry-level X-series model (166 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mike FL: "FUJIFILM X-A10 with XC16-50mmF3.5-5.6 OIS II kit will be available from January 2017 with a Suggested Retail Price of $499/£499.00".

$499, [really?], is a DOA as for $50 more users can get the all time best selling ML SONY a6000:

https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera-16-50mm/dp/B00I8BICB2/ref=sr_1_3?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1480657997&sr=1-3&keywords=sony+a6000

@abortabort You don't even take photos, your gallery has ZERO photos in it, I'd bet any amount of money that you have as much talent as you have sense. But today is my day off, and I have better things to do than talk with some unbalanced pos.

So do me a favor, since you've got a lot to say from behind your keyboard, PM me your name and address and tomorrow morning I'll be over, and you can say the things you said above to my face. If not, take your meds, keep quiet and sit the f down.

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2016 at 17:18 UTC
On article Fujifilm launches X-A10 as entry-level X-series model (166 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mike FL: "FUJIFILM X-A10 with XC16-50mmF3.5-5.6 OIS II kit will be available from January 2017 with a Suggested Retail Price of $499/£499.00".

$499, [really?], is a DOA as for $50 more users can get the all time best selling ML SONY a6000:

https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera-16-50mm/dp/B00I8BICB2/ref=sr_1_3?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1480657997&sr=1-3&keywords=sony+a6000

We are talking about Sony APS-C lenses, not FE, not A mount. Der. But it figures you'd bring up Sigma. I'd bring up Sigma too is I shot an A6000, pretty much the only optically excellent lens for the A6000 is the Sigma 30 f/1.4. Sony just isn't committed to making a system for the A series bodies, and their optical engineers aren't first rate like Fuji's, which is why they need Zeiss to make their lenses. Some companies just aren't good at making optics. Sony bought all those great Minolta lenses only to essentially kill off the A-mount, because NOBODY shoots is (talk about a steaming pile), NOBODY is buying it. So for the last time, if you are going to buy a system camera, it needs to have an actual system of lenses. And Sony APS-C lineup is about the worst out of all mirrorless cameras. It's all consumer software corrected 3.5-5.6 zooms and pricey f1.8 (f2.8 equivalent) lenses with ugly silver barrels. Bad lenses, terrible investment. But feel free. Don't bother replying.

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2016 at 15:22 UTC
On article Fujifilm launches X-A10 as entry-level X-series model (166 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mike FL: "FUJIFILM X-A10 with XC16-50mmF3.5-5.6 OIS II kit will be available from January 2017 with a Suggested Retail Price of $499/£499.00".

$499, [really?], is a DOA as for $50 more users can get the all time best selling ML SONY a6000:

https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera-16-50mm/dp/B00I8BICB2/ref=sr_1_3?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1480657997&sr=1-3&keywords=sony+a6000

@abortabort
Zero macros? lol. And unlike the Sony E 30 f/3.5 (too short for anything but stamp and copy work, and too slow for anything but macro), the Fujifilm 60 f/2.4 is actually good optically. But by all means stick to your Sony consumer stuff. Cheers. Go do some research, your feeble attempts at insults failed miserably just like Sony did with the NEX lens lineup.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/839144-REG/Fujifilm_16240767_60mm_f_2_4_XF_Lens.html

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2016 at 14:44 UTC
On article Fujifilm launches X-A10 as entry-level X-series model (166 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mike FL: "FUJIFILM X-A10 with XC16-50mmF3.5-5.6 OIS II kit will be available from January 2017 with a Suggested Retail Price of $499/£499.00".

$499, [really?], is a DOA as for $50 more users can get the all time best selling ML SONY a6000:

https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera-16-50mm/dp/B00I8BICB2/ref=sr_1_3?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1480657997&sr=1-3&keywords=sony+a6000

@abortabort I posted the links to Lenstip reviews with the Fujinon lenses breaking resolution records. I also pointed out that Sony doesn't even make a single crop sensor lens faster than f/1.8, and not a single constant aperture f/2.8 zoom. It's all f4 and variable aperture consumer lenses. Follow the link, do your own research. Lastly, more people above agree with me so you can stop with your little name calling tantrum. If you can't be civil, don't post.

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2016 at 13:36 UTC
On article Lensrentals tears down the Nikon 105mm F1.4 (157 comments in total)
In reply to:

marc petzold: The best Part on lensrentals blog about this specific Nikon lens is: very expensive, brand new, "SVM" Myth busted, thanks to Roger, and what is unbelievable at this price point: plastic gears into their promoted "SVM" drive...i'd never *buy* such a lens, with cheap plastic gears...it simply won't last decades....metal gears should be pretty much standard, for such a "highend" lens...but not so for Nikon....it seems...sad, but true. Well, here's Canon with their Ring USM really much better - and i am much more a Nikon Fan then Canon...believe me, but that AF-Engine is sub-standard, especially for it's price class. No offence. OTOH, great glass, of course. ;-)

@Henry McA

From Lenstip, one of the very best lens review website.

http://www.lenstip.com/492.4-Lens_review-Nikon_Nikkor_AF-S_105_mm_f_1.4E_ED_Image_resolution.html

http://www.lenstip.com/415.4-Lens_review-Carl_Zeiss_Otus_85_mm_f_1.4_Image_resolution.html

Read the lens tests, the Nikkor 105mm f/1.4 is sharper at max aperture and at peak performance, where it resolves 49 lpmm vs 47 lpmm for the Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4. Like I said, the Nikkor provides "Zeiss Otus" performance with AF at half the price.

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2016 at 13:16 UTC
Total: 2867, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »