new boyz

Joined on Apr 18, 2013


Total: 613, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Nikon 105mm F1.4E ED sample images (231 comments in total)
In reply to:

samfan: That's a nice lady.

This makes me want to see the gallery.

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2016 at 14:44 UTC
On article Teardown reveals Sony image sensors in iPhone 7 (164 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nick Brundle - Photography: We live in a world where losing your iPhone is way more dramatic than losing your virginity

Losing virginity to an iPhone? Hahaha.. Sorry, couldn't help.

Link | Posted on Sep 25, 2016 at 02:32 UTC
On article Photokina 2016: Hands-on with Sony a99 II (438 comments in total)
In reply to:

EwanMC: The form factor alone makes the A99II vastly superior in handling to a A7 series camera and the the PDAF sensor fusion with the ones, on sensor, is also beyond what could be achieved on an A7 series.

But A7 is smaller and more modular. Horses for courses, of course.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 09:05 UTC
On article Hands-on with Nikon's latest kit at Photokina (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

makofoto: The still shooters in the movie industry are abandoning their big heavy Canon and Nikon DSLR's, which require further heavy large sound blimps, for Fuji and Sony Mirrorless cameras.

There's EFSC to minimize the shutter sound. Also mirrorless doesn't have mirror-slap sound.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 00:52 UTC
On article YI M1 Mirrorless ILC First Impressions Review (370 comments in total)

Sizzling yee mee? Hhahahaha...

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 13:09 UTC as 66th comment

Lens and camera look huge because of focal length used.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 12:29 UTC as 18th comment
In reply to:

DME: It is indeed a shame that there's no touchscreen.

It's just great for me because it's an awesome camera otherwise, exactly what I'm looking for ( if the high I SO is as good as the Nikon d750) and I would have to buy this. Problem is, I really wanted a lighter weight camera and this camera + the 24-70 2.8 ( the only standard zoom lens for this camera ) is not lightweight at all. So this solves my problem of making up my mind.
But yes, I totally agree- no touchscreen in this camera is shameful - and totally ridiculous!

I think it's because of articulating screen. Canon has tilt only (sturdier) so a touch to the screen will not move the titled screen much.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 21:23 UTC
In reply to:

gameshoes3003: Person ignorant of the A-mount here. From what I'm understanding, these A-mount cameras have a translucent mirror, right? Does that mean that there is less light reaching the sensor? Do you have to start cranking up the ISO earlier relative to other cameras?

Yes, less light but BSI tech compensate that. About the ISO, you don't have to manually crank it, it's been tuned to offset the light deficiencies.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 14:34 UTC

Wait, no XQD?

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 14:29 UTC as 161st comment
On article 6K here we come: Here's the new Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH5 (175 comments in total)

And Canon stuck with 1080 HD in 2016.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 14:24 UTC as 34th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

peeyaj: 12fps at 42mp is huge in data processing! Hope it won't overheat!

It will, it's a Sony anyway. Still.. Holly fu@$..just insane.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 13:17 UTC
In reply to:

OzarkAggie: Reliability is a factor that seems to get short shifted in these critiques. Sony may offer 4k video but if it overheats the electronics then it's not practical.

I'm tired of all this angst directed at Canon. Choose your camera and be happy.

4k + overheat is better than no 4k at all.. people will find a way to cool their camera. How to fix no 4k feature? Canon's suggestion : Buy Cinema EOS. Right.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 07:17 UTC
In reply to:

bernardf12: It may be late, but at least it looks like Canon is no longer ignoring the mirrorless market.

They are now just reluctant, no longer ignorance I agree.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 06:41 UTC
In reply to:

Jefftan: Any Canon APS-C DSLR has 4k now?
Is there any technical reason no 4k and not just so u will have to buy m6 to get 4k?

I don't know, Cinema EOS maybe?

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 05:55 UTC
In reply to:

cgarrard: So basically, Canon can do better than that. :)



Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 05:50 UTC

" I like to think that if Canon had persisted with development we could be shooting with mind-controlled cameras by now."

Win comment.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 05:44 UTC as 123rd comment
On article Throwback Thursday: Canon PowerShot Pro70 (110 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ace of Sevens: Sony and Olympus kept using proprietary cards until considerably less than 10 years ago. Kudos to Canon for using something accessible.

Up until CFast. XQD is better for long run.

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2016 at 11:06 UTC
In reply to:

K1000usr: Is there a camera which sync's at 1/8000 shutter speed? Thanks.

You mean minimum shutter speed = 1/8000? Most high end DSLR, some even do 1/16000. If you really mean sync, that depend entirely on the flash unit used. I believe most high end external flash can do that too, with HSS(High Speed Sync). Without HSS, min sync-able shutter speed usually within 1/200-250.

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2016 at 08:10 UTC
On article Canon EOS M5: What you need to know (548 comments in total)
In reply to:

CosminMunteanu: Well, the X-T10 or OM-D E-M10 did not receive so many explanations when it was lanched.
Why a special article about the M5. The same information can be found in the article related to the final review. Because it is a Canon? Seems more like advertising to me.

I think it's a new format. Look at recent camera reviews - A6300, D5, D500...

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2016 at 06:37 UTC
In reply to:

ttran88: "Fastest AF of all EOS M cameras" lol Wow this sounds encouraging.

Sounds very Apple-ish.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 21:37 UTC
Total: 613, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »