DeathArrow

Joined on Sep 26, 2016

Comments

Total: 582, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
In reply to:

DeathArrow: As a 300mm f/3 equivalent, being more expensive than Nikon 300mm f/2.8 and lacking a body such as D5, I see a limited market for that.

To have the same amount of noise i.e. the same SNR as the FF sensor, the APS-C sensor needs more light. So to have the same FOV, DOF and SNR, not only the focal length needs multiplication by the crop factor but also the f-stop.

Link | Posted on Nov 5, 2019 at 13:17 UTC
In reply to:

DeathArrow: As a 300mm f/3 equivalent, being more expensive than Nikon 300mm f/2.8 and lacking a body such as D5, I see a limited market for that.

@D7000ShooterUK like I've said, do yourself a favor an read the articles.

Link | Posted on Nov 5, 2019 at 12:27 UTC
In reply to:

DeathArrow: As a 300mm f/3 equivalent, being more expensive than Nikon 300mm f/2.8 and lacking a body such as D5, I see a limited market for that.

@D7000ShooterUK
It's actually not. Do yourself a favor and read the fine articles about equivalence written by DPR staff.

Link | Posted on Nov 5, 2019 at 09:36 UTC

As a 300mm f/3 equivalent, being more expensive than Nikon 300mm f/2.8 and lacking a body such as D5, I see a limited market for that.

Link | Posted on Nov 5, 2019 at 06:18 UTC as 19th comment | 18 replies

These images are just poor quality feminist manifestos. I don''t see their relation with photography.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2019 at 05:27 UTC as 32nd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

DeathArrow: The only important thing Lightroom had and PhotoLab missed was the ability to assign keywords to images and search images based on keywords. Now, that it has that, I will give another try to PhotoLab.

It might be the time to switch.

@jay-A for color that is only true if you use regular Adobe process. If you switch profile, things are much nicer. For Nikon I enjoy using Camera Vivid and Camera Portrait.

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2019 at 06:20 UTC

The only important thing Lightroom had and PhotoLab missed was the ability to assign keywords to images and search images based on keywords. Now, that it has that, I will give another try to PhotoLab.

It might be the time to switch.

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2019 at 05:17 UTC as 17th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

DeathArrow: I don't like these weird focal lengths. 28-75, 70-180.
What's wrong with 24-70 and 70-200?

It's a bit short.

Link | Posted on Oct 23, 2019 at 07:33 UTC
In reply to:

DeathArrow: I don't like these weird focal lengths. 28-75, 70-180.
What's wrong with 24-70 and 70-200?

But both Tamron and Sigma have 24-70 and 70-200 for EF and F mount and they are selling very well. So price isn't a reason.

Link | Posted on Oct 23, 2019 at 05:47 UTC

Cool! If Olympus stuff sees this, they might launch a new mount. Many say that sensor size doesn't impact image quality. :D

Link | Posted on Oct 23, 2019 at 05:21 UTC as 18th comment | 1 reply

When you already have f/2.8 zooms, why bother buying primes? f/1.4 or even f/1.2 would be much more useful.

Link | Posted on Oct 23, 2019 at 05:19 UTC as 37th comment | 4 replies

I don't like these weird focal lengths. 28-75, 70-180.
What's wrong with 24-70 and 70-200?

Link | Posted on Oct 23, 2019 at 05:16 UTC as 41st comment | 9 replies
In reply to:

goodgeorge: 9 Canons
6 Nikons
2 Sony

... Where are my Fujis and Olympuses?

Fuji and Olympus are shooting daisies in the park.

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2019 at 07:45 UTC
In reply to:

RvEL: @Rishi, if you're about to write yet another mobile camera test, could you please at least add a 1 inch compact, m4/3 and APS-C to the comparison? (FF Would be a bit unrealistic from a price perspective). No matter the software implemented in e.g. a Pixel, I am still convinced that such a small sensor has a hard time to compete with real cameras. Most likely even the 1 inch compact ones. Thanks!

@BobSac, here's the link: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4381060

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2019 at 07:06 UTC
In reply to:

RvEL: @Rishi, if you're about to write yet another mobile camera test, could you please at least add a 1 inch compact, m4/3 and APS-C to the comparison? (FF Would be a bit unrealistic from a price perspective). No matter the software implemented in e.g. a Pixel, I am still convinced that such a small sensor has a hard time to compete with real cameras. Most likely even the 1 inch compact ones. Thanks!

Someone posted a comparison for low light in the forums between P30 and an MFT Panasonic camera. P30 didn't lose.

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2019 at 05:44 UTC
In reply to:

DeathArrow: I'd love to see a comparison between Pixel 4, P30 and iPhone XS. I'm curious if P30 is still king of low light.

Dxomark rates Huawei Mate 30 Pro as the best for low light. They didn't test Pixel 4 yet, though.

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2019 at 13:46 UTC
In reply to:

Jonas Palm: Seems like a very likeable camera.
Light, small, great IBIS, weather protected with very efficient sensor cleaning, high eye-point finder, decent hybrid AF.... Plus it’s supported by a wide system.

It a very sensibly practical camera, with enough character that you can actually enjoy it’s company too.

The most I like about it is the vintage tech coupled with a high price. :)

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2019 at 07:11 UTC

Price is too low. Die hard fans will be happy to pay at least $2000 for this "marvel". Olympus marketing team made a mistake.

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2019 at 07:10 UTC as 313th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

gaul: Wooaaaahhhh look how small it is

As a FF user, I would be tempted .. Vs a so-called compact expert as RX 100 or Gx V

Pixel 4 and iPhone XS IQ in a much bulkier package and for a higher price. :)

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2019 at 07:08 UTC
In reply to:

JJBerlin: Blinded by the FF hype train, most people will underappreciate what this camera has to offer.
Sure, it's Image quality can't match any FF camera, but it's good enough for most situations. It's also a much more affordable system with great lenses in all price ranges. Small size, stellar IBIS and tough enough to handle a lot of abuse. It's the perfect camera for travellers.

I still own the original OM-D E-M5. On my last travel I carried an ordinary messenger bag over my shoulder. Inside werde the camera, four lenses, spare batteries, an additional grip etc...

It can't match lower priced APS-C, FF is too far away from it. What is there to appreciate? Old tech for a steep price? If its price was $600, no one would comment but $1200?

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2019 at 07:06 UTC
Total: 582, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »