Jonathan Mac

Me too. Paris through Pentax is much better in my opinion.

27º does not refer to temperature. ISO 400 is 27º DIN, the older scale for measuring sensitivity.

Lomography have either made a typo or are idiots that don't know what they're doing.

Those results look good and it's always good to see a new film, but B&W film prices are getting silly with new offerings seemingly significantly more expensive than tried-and tested excellent films...

I think it's because, unlike most mirrorless systems, Fuji have very quickly produced a good range of superb lenses of their own, so there's less of a gap for third party makers to fill. Still, I...

I did read it, and understood it. Apparently you read it but failed to understand. I'd suggest trying again.

I wish they'd release the 56mm for Fujifilm X mount :(

Of course I read it.

I'm sorry, I didn't realise that it's frowned upon to comment on a feature unless it's the first time such a feature has ever appeared on a product.

Yes, the shuffle sold...

General consensus is that film loses half it's sensitivity over a ten year period, so ten-year-old ISO 400 film should be shot as if it were ISO 200 etc. That's assuming it's stored somewhere cool...

I remember when Apple started to produce their shuffle model which had no screen. All the Apple fans screamed that it's "innovation" while the rest of us could see it for what it really was:...

Seems like a good, honest review that further show that this camera seems to be a bit half-baked. Maybe Canon got wind of Nikon's release schedule and rushed to market with glitchy firmware and...

New films are always good news, even if they're slightly modified old films.

I think some guy designed a fix, but he didn't work for Sony, he just saw the problem and applied some programming skills.

Another torpedo slams into the hull of the fledgling CaNikon mirrorless war machine... :)

Disclaimer: joke

Only that it's the most useful single focal length out there (for full frame).

The name "Gitzo Mini Traveler" seems to imply that it's intended as a travel tripod, though I agree with firesurfer - it isn't one.

This style of tripod is far too small to be very useful when traveling. A travel tripod needs to extend to at least 1m high and even then would be very limiting.

$200 is far too much for something...

I notice that the price is anything but Zenit... Surely a real Zenit should cost a quarter of a Leica? :)

The new L-mount alliance with Sigma involvement and FF Panasonic bodies makes me think that Tamron are being left somewhat out in the cold. I'm sure they'll make lenses for the new mirrorless...

Leica will add their name to some lenses without actually doing any work and get a percentage of the profits, same as they're done with previous Panasonic products.

Boosting the camera and lens...

I liked the review but I don't think this lens looks compact at all. I have an old Sigma 24/2.8 which is compact but I think it's around half the size of the Sony. Maybe compact for a modern f/1.4...