the reason

Still lying to yourselves. If I use an 85mm 1.2 on m43 despite the not so shallow depth of field you wont be able to tell. Unless you do a side by side (which is useless in the real world) you wont...

No you can't. Anyone that says they can tell the difference between formats in a blind test is lying. To you or worse, to themselves.

EXkurogane vignetting goes away when stopping down like you do, and the new 1.2 has a fair amount of vignette, more than the zeiss actually.. all the lenses mentioned above have more or less the...

EXkurogane you still don't get it, you gain nothing. Your "high standard" are made up. Youre stopping it down to an aperture where it doesnt matter. The zeiss, the art and even the crappy 50 1.8...

@EXkurogane first of all pixel peepers are the saddest most pathetic thing in photography. Second, no its not. At f2.8-4 the difference will be negligible if any between the art, zeiss and the gm,...

@EXkurogane you're still making zero sense. If ca and other things get better stopping down, and resolution is the same,, then it's super stupid to spend the money on this to stop it down when you...

@EXkurogane that's a whole lot of words just to confirm how moronic it is. The zeiss at f2.8 will be just as sharp as this, he'll, the sigma at 2.8 will be as sharp. And then focus stacking further...

Sony made a 50 1.2??? In the 80s????????

Holy crap people are reaching....youre buying an f1.2 lens with the purpose of stopping it down and then do focus stacking....beyond moronic

Weeeeeell, Manny Ortiz did a compare of the 3 and nikon was the worst by far

@snapa not really. Some olys have had bird tracking for a while, it does amazing plus a 150-400 f4 lens with a built in 1.25 extender. Thats 1000mm f5.6!!

3d tracking from nikon?? Oh no. It doesnt do that. Youre not getting it