Mark B.

I've never been a fan of adapters.  There are 2 interfaces, so you have to swap one device at a time to see which is the problem.

It's not even released yet. All you can do is read reviewer's comments that were lucky enough to get their hands on a pre-production unit. BTW, I've acclimated to the EVF on my R6, after using OVF ...

What has worked really well for me with my Canon EX flashes is Yongnuo wireless triggers.  I started with using the optical triggering built-in to my Canon DSLRs (or an optical trigger mounted in ...

This would be a great question for the Studio & Lighting forum https://www.dpreview.com/forums/1025

It's mirrorless.  It can only have an EVF.  In case you haven't noticed it's pretty obvious Canon is done developing new DSLRs. Mark

What was the exact e-mail address it came from?  Sounds like a phishing scam.  I've NEVER gotten an e-mail from dpr asking to fill out a survey.  As suggested, bring it to DPR's attention (suggest ...

https://www.canonwatch.com/canon-ef-16-600mm-f2-8l-is-usm-lens-exists-and-is-shipping/ Well, not really.  Pay close attention to the date - April 1 ;-) This should tell you all you need to know ...

But what if some blown highlights are part of the photographer's vision for the image?  To me "optimum" exposure is whatever exposure will give the intended result, blown highlights or not. It ...

Never saw that on any of my Canon cameras.  And it's not something I change often enough that I would want a dedicated dial taken up for it.

It's listed in the specs .

I was thinking exactly the same thing.  I've seen a lot of positive reviews here on DPR about MPB.

I use this flash on my R6, it works perfectly.  There's no reason it won't work just as well with the R5.

Assuming the camera will allow that, I'm not sure how the resolution would be the same.  Would it not crop the image to APS-C size?  This should result in the same pixel loss, ie an image with ...

Wasn't the 1DX III "only" 20mp?

Why?  When did Canon say the R5 series would be the be-all end-all of their mirrorless FF?

Maybe you missed one of my earlier comments.  The tripod height does not include the head, nor the camera.  Both of these should be considered.  The height of the VF on the camera, for example, is ...

Don't think there are going to be any surprises.  The R3 will be the only body announced, along with the aforementioned lenses though they won't be for a new body - any RF mount will do.

You must remember that the "maximum height" spec given is always with the center column raised completely (unless it does not have one but this one does).  That said, that is the most unstable ...

You definitely don't want to cheap out on a tripod supporting a $3,900 camera.  Not to mention the 100-400 + extender + adapter is going to add weight.  Keep in mind, though, that the head will ...