Mark B.

First things off the top of my head:  Use lenses other than the wide & tele that's on my phone (anywhere from 10mm to 500mm with the lenses I have), adjust shutter spd, aperture, add fill flash ...

I thought the auto-crop was only with Canon lenses, and all 3rd party lenses required this to be enabled manually?

The R5 will be in a completely different class than the RP both in terms of features and cost. If you can wait until at least July and can spend between $3-$4k on a body you may as well wait and ...

I can't believe someone things these 2 things are comparable.

I'm not saying I "need" the R6 to be an entry level body, it's just my opinion of what will happen.  I could be wrong.  Just like it's an opinion that the R6 will have dual slots.  I do not think ...

Maybe not.  But it very well could replace the RP as the entry-level FF mirrorless.  Guess we'll find out in July.

I suspect the RP may be a one-off and the R6 will occupy the entry level slot.  We'll see.

I still find dual card slots very hard to believe if this will be the mirrorless 6D.  It doesn't fit in with an entry-level offering.

Nah, Canon's not going to release a MILC FF body lacking a VF.

Buy the correct size filter, do away with adapters.  This the ONLY way guaranteed to not have this problem.  Plus, it allows you to retain use of the lens hood  which will go far in preventing ...

According to a post 3 months ago, the OP was planning on returning it and getting something else.

Well I'm glad I've never worked directly in retail then. There are many things I don't want to buy only online.  Clothes for one thing.  I'd rather look at them in person and not on a computer ...

Bezos is apparently on the brink of becoming the world's first trillionaire if things keep going as well for Amazon.

No you can't.

Owned by Amazon, but funding for their paid staff comes from advertising.  Why else do you think it would be free?  The only way to reduce or eliminate the ads would be to have a paid subscriber ...

Judging by the comments, most gave it right back to the OP lol.

Couldn't say, I've never used the 400.  I would guess they're pretty close since both the Canon 100-400 and 400 f/5.6 L are f/5.6 @ 400mm.  The newer version of the 100-400 may be a little faster ...

On an APS-C body, bare min would be 400mm.  Canon 100-400 f/4-5.6 L II has gotten extremely good reviews.  You can save some money & weight with the Sigma & Tamron alternatives, but 1) they are a ...

Wow, 3 grand for dating site profile pics?

You may want to ask this in the Pro Digital Talk forum.