Lives in Germany Germany
Joined on Jul 25, 2010


Total: 46, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

This sensational cameras will save Nikon´s ass for sure.

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2017 at 20:19 UTC as 3rd comment

Only 6 blades? Gives an ugly bokeh!

Link | Posted on Dec 24, 2016 at 12:33 UTC as 27th comment
On article Flickr reveals its top 25 photos of 2016 (190 comments in total)

Most of them are overprocessed.

Link | Posted on Dec 17, 2016 at 17:01 UTC as 66th comment | 3 replies
On article Canon EOS M5 real-world sample gallery (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

PhotoKhan: Ok...

I click in this review link and the very first image I see - a simple shot of an apple chosen by Allison to illustrate the first page - has a color rendition, tone mapping range, micro contrast management and appropriate sharpness acuity that make the apple look like it is popping in 3D from my monitor.

If people can't see what Canon cameras bring to the table (...regardless of weaker or stronger feature sets than the competition...) in terms of sheer overall image quality, I really can't help them.

A red apple on the top of green/yellow apples is "popping in 3D" because of the "sheer image quality" of Canon !?!

What a nonsense.

Link | Posted on Dec 6, 2016 at 15:42 UTC
On article Gear of the Year: Carey's choice - Canon PowerShot G9 X (212 comments in total)

The size is great for the pocket.


1. Slow lens
2. No 4k
3. No EVF

So neither one thing nor another.

Link | Posted on Dec 5, 2016 at 15:46 UTC as 41st comment | 4 replies
On article Lensrentals tears down the Nikon 105mm F1.4 (157 comments in total)
In reply to:

noflashplease: Just how much cost cutting is acceptable in a $2,200 lens? For this price, I'd expect a ring ultrasonic motor, not a geared micromotor. The rest of the build looks cheap and old fashioned as well. This is what I'd expect from bargain bin 3rd party lens of yesteryear, not a Nikkor at this price level.

Richard Butler: "Ring-type AF tends to perform poorly for the constant changes in direction that CDAF (as used in video and live view on most Nikon bodies) requires."

But CDAF is in any case nearlly unusable on Nikon bodies, therefore no reason to use a micro motor on this lense.

Link | Posted on Dec 5, 2016 at 09:51 UTC
On article Lensrentals tears down the Nikon 105mm F1.4 (157 comments in total)

Thoese gearwheels look really cheap.

Link | Posted on Dec 3, 2016 at 09:44 UTC as 41st comment | 5 replies

Hopefully we will not soon be able to buy the LAST camera Nikon ever produced ...

Link | Posted on Dec 1, 2016 at 06:06 UTC as 16th comment

The iPhone is able to produce nice pictures in good light - like most P & S -cameras since about 15 years.

Link | Posted on Nov 20, 2016 at 11:43 UTC as 89th comment | 3 replies
On article Tiny marvel: Panasonic LX10 sample photos (77 comments in total)
In reply to:

PhotoUniverse: Can't wait to get a Nikon DL.

You will wait for a very long time.

Link | Posted on Nov 11, 2016 at 16:51 UTC
On article Nikon D5600 DSLR announced, though not in the US (298 comments in total)

Wow, how exciting.
Even better than the great KeyMission.

Good bye Nikon.

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2016 at 10:12 UTC as 66th comment | 3 replies

890$ per cm² sensor size! LOL!

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 07:58 UTC as 167th comment | 4 replies
On article Nikon KeyMission action cameras now shipping in US (81 comments in total)

Wow, without significant delay!

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2016 at 19:44 UTC as 33rd comment
In reply to:

Marty4650: What is interesting is that your comparison tool only allows comparing phones to phones and cameras to cameras.

It might be useful to be able to compare phones to cameras, especially for those who insist that the phones "are just as good as cameras are."

www.imaging-resource.com is better in this terms.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2016 at 07:44 UTC
On article Modest Updates: Nikon D3400 Review (378 comments in total)

Boring update.
Lame features.
Not the image quality of a full frame camera.

But - honestly speaking - probably enough for 90% of the commentators here - me including.

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2016 at 17:43 UTC as 86th comment | 4 replies

What impresses me most is the really fair price.

Link | Posted on Oct 13, 2016 at 15:04 UTC as 49th comment | 1 reply

Very nice camera, but much to pricey, especially in EUR.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 15:04 UTC as 288th comment
On article Google Pixel tops DxOMark's Mobile rankings (116 comments in total)
In reply to:

mick232: I was shocked to see a value of 89 for a phone - this is the same score as my full frame Alpha 99.

Then I realised it is DxO Mobile, a separate ranking. You should have mentioned that.

"but there doesn't seem to be a way to get a direct comparison"

Look at imaging-resource.com
There you can compare some smartphones with real cameras (camera reviews => compare images)

Link | Posted on Oct 5, 2016 at 13:51 UTC
On article iPhone 7 Plus real-world sample gallery (262 comments in total)

The bokeh effect might not be perfect, but it´s cool nevertheless.
Hope to see it soon in cheaper smartphones.

Link | Posted on Oct 1, 2016 at 06:55 UTC as 39th comment | 1 reply
On article Throwback Thursday: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1 (209 comments in total)

Good old times for photo industry ...

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2016 at 18:10 UTC as 86th comment
Total: 46, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »