Abu Mahendra

It is not hard to decipher why a prime lens would have no zoom lock switch. In any case, the 24-105L may not have one, but the 24-70LII does.

Actually, Marco, i remember that thread quite well. Not only did some, including myself, say that one can unlock the thing with one hand, but also--more crucially and countering your suggestion ...

Let me share my perspective. I bicycle-tour. in fact i just finished a three-week tour of Taiwan. Touring strives to reduce weight because your own strength is required to schlep your stuff ...

...that does 4k & 1440p at 60fps, 1080p at 240/120fps with wide and UW FoV. Small, light, water-proof to 10m. So, no, not a great impetus to jump on that bandwagon.

Canon managed to mass-produce an AF lens of optical image quality comparable to Zeiss, Leica, etc. at a much lower price.

The 100L's 50mm counterpart.

hi...i would take what i, in fact, did take, the M15-45IS. cheers.

poor you. walled behind the confines of your narrow truths , blind to a greater one.

The lens was released in 2006 when Canon APSC sensors were only 8MP.

I'd prefer a hybrid with histogram and level that could be turned off at will, defaulting back to OVF.

...plus lower price and weight, better CA performance, and 1:1 magnification. Of course I am referring to the 100L.

The M22/2 manual focus ring is focus-by-wire. Turning it while off the camera, or with the camera off will tell you little.

I shoot both concurrently, the 35IS on FF. They are both awesome lenses. They both have quite a bit of vignetting wide open. 35IS has better CA performance, while the M22 has zero distorsion. The ...

No question about it. It autofocuses, it has IS, it has greater focal range.

Basturds.

Return it.

Not to negate or minimize your concerns, but I find the transfer to mobile devices, however limited to jpeg, very useful. I use a 10.5" AMOLED Android tablet with Lightroom for light editing, and ...

Dropping the 6D line? They may have dropped the ball with the 6D2, if that's what you mean...