Cameracist

Joined on Jun 26, 2013

Comments

Total: 543, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Canon EOS 5D IV: What you need to know (104 comments in total)

Canon doesn't innovate? Since when is dual pixel af and now the dual pixel raw not an innovation?

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2016 at 07:55 UTC as 4th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Bennie 01: Is the Canon EF 100-400 mm Mark 11 lens adaptable to a EOS 550 D.
Will the lens do good on it? What is the current price tag in the USA?

Mark 11? Is this post from teh future?

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2016 at 20:07 UTC
On article Canon EOS M10 real-world samples (52 comments in total)
In reply to:

Toni Salmonelli: Now back to the topic. Namely picture quality. I still really like the output of that old 18 MP sensor. It still holds well in comparison to the new 24 MP Sensor in the M3 and does not produce such big files with higher ISO settings as the new sensor. Since the new 24 MP sensor also did not improve that much regarding dynamic range I think this camera is a really good value for someone that does not need the extra dials, function button and the hit shoe on the M3.

It holds well in comparison with the 24MP Canon sensor, yes. But don't try to compare it with newer 16, 20 or 24MP sensors by Sony...

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2016 at 11:44 UTC
On article Canon EOS M10 real-world samples (52 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ben Herrmann: I've managed to own all of the M series of cameras and I got this M10 for "Da Misses," however, I've got to say that it is a delightful camera - one that holds up well and takes excellent images. I borrowed it once from her just to give it a try (had to pry it from her hands). I was very, very pleasantly surprised at the ergonomics, the feel and handling of the camera - but most of all the IQ. I shoot in RAW only and it was a delight to use. I managed to get hers (with lens) for only $379 off of an eBay vendor that had several (new obviously) for that price (located in the US).

Misses?
I bought mirrorless for better AF accuracy... not for misses.

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2016 at 11:39 UTC
On article Canon EOS M10 real-world samples (52 comments in total)

Wow! The lovely EOS 550D sensor in a pocked-sized body!
Should it cost 2x that much, it would be worth the price!

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2016 at 11:36 UTC as 6th comment | 1 reply
On article Canon EOS 5D Mark IV First Impressions Review (1131 comments in total)
In reply to:

mariuss: Because no Answer on my question, i will repeat it:
Using the Dual Pixel Raw will have an effect on Noise and DR comparing to the "normal" Raw?
Thanks.

The Silver Nemesis: I'd say 100% probably.

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2016 at 09:02 UTC

First I read "Getting our dirty hands the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV"
:-D

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2016 at 08:53 UTC as 18th comment
On article Throwback Thursday: Canon EOS 5D (200 comments in total)

Throwback Olympus E-1 please.
Thanks!
(I have both 5D and E-1 - its fun shooting with such dinosaurs:-)

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2016 at 07:56 UTC as 61st comment | 1 reply

Many displeased and dissapointed comments, but what is ACTUALLY missing? May be IBIS? But that's not probable in a Canon anytime soon...

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2016 at 06:19 UTC as 47th comment | 4 replies

Try Zoner Photo Studio. Very universal piece of software. Organiser, Raw module, basic editor and separated viewer. Cheap, too.

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2016 at 16:10 UTC as 78th comment
On article Pentax K-70 firmware 1.10 now available (20 comments in total)

I switched to Sony after the release of a7 but still lust after the Pentax, which was the brand of choice for me before that. The K-1 and K-70 would be a great combo...

Link | Posted on Aug 22, 2016 at 20:36 UTC as 6th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Chaitanya S: I hope tamron releases this lens for K-Mount. That system really needs some good macros right now.

Not like the D-FA 100/2.8...

Link | Posted on Aug 20, 2016 at 07:28 UTC
In reply to:

2JoeA7R2: Thank you, Sony and DPR.

Thank you, mom. Thank you, dad.

Link | Posted on Aug 18, 2016 at 20:26 UTC

Wonderful camera, I have/had 3. One for me, one for my wife and one given to my dad. We are an Epic family:-)))

Link | Posted on Aug 18, 2016 at 13:55 UTC as 122nd comment

Ohmygodyes!!! I've been waiting years for this! ^_^ *♡*

Link | Posted on Aug 17, 2016 at 17:36 UTC as 32nd comment
In reply to:

Photato: Well written piece Richard. I think it is unacceptable that the 80D video resolution is effectively bellow 1080P. Considering that Phones can do 4K these days.
Any reasons why the Panasonic GH4 didn't make it into this comparison?

I tested the resolution of "4K" footage from Galaxy s7 to find out there is not more than 2mpx of detail...

Link | Posted on Aug 15, 2016 at 15:54 UTC
In reply to:

Jesaja: So what this review says? It's well known answers.Good descriptions but feeble criticism.

For deeper criticism read full reviews...

Link | Posted on Aug 15, 2016 at 15:51 UTC
On article Throwback Thursday: when studio lenses retire (203 comments in total)
In reply to:

King Penguin: Call me a Luddite, but all my lenses are of the AF D variety.......16 f2.8 fisheye, 20 f2.8, 35 f2, the nifty fifty f1.4 and the 85 f1.8.

The 85 is particularly nice but it's the 20 and 35 that get the most use.....great travel lenses.....small, light, unobtrusive, perfect for walkabouts.

Finally, I've set up my cam to be able to use the aperture ring on the lens, which I prefer.

Luddite!

Link | Posted on Aug 11, 2016 at 08:09 UTC
On article Samyang introduces full-frame 20mm F1.8 ED AS UMC (146 comments in total)
In reply to:

spidercrown: wow it sounds very pricey, considering the nikon just cost slightly higher.

OK, not shooting Nikon lenses the ones I saw were without, but now I see they exist.
Still, you would be buying more expensive lens, then you have to buy an adapter (more $ for a quality one) and the result will be much clunkier than using this Samyang;-)

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2016 at 21:35 UTC
On article Samyang introduces full-frame 20mm F1.8 ED AS UMC (146 comments in total)
In reply to:

spidercrown: wow it sounds very pricey, considering the nikon just cost slightly higher.

AshMills: The 20/1.8 Nikkor doesn't have an aperture ring, so on Canon there is no way to control the aperture and on Sony E you need a special adapter which is either clunky or expensive.

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2016 at 12:28 UTC
Total: 543, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »