kape06111

kape06111

Joined on Dec 18, 2011

Comments

Total: 14, showing: 1 – 14
On article Pentax KP Review (665 comments in total)

Like this camera. May be a good companion to my Fuji X100F, adding the 70 and 15 lmtd primes.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2017 at 11:38 UTC as 26th comment | 1 reply
On article Hands-on with Ricoh's compact Pentax KP (635 comments in total)

Nice camera. Looking forward to see its behaviour on the field.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2017 at 16:20 UTC as 10th comment
In reply to:

kape06111: Like this body, really like it.
But where are the fast primes. I was expecting at least a Lens Roadmap for the next 2 years, but nothing just a new all around lens which is for sure good for the system, but not enaugh IMHO.

Come on canon give me a 24 equiv f2.0, a 50 equiv f2.0 and an 85 f2.0 equiv and I drop my Fuji system.

jato, there is an ecosystem around the canon system (not the eos m, but canon), for instance a really complete and consistence Flash system, this is my may complaint right now with my beloved the fuji system. Don´t get me wrong, I own the Xpro 2 and love it, same as my 16 f1.4, my 35 f2 and 60 f2.4, but i tis just about the lighting. If Nissin or Prophoto would come out with a Fuji support, then i would never think into change Fuji by canon.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 19:38 UTC

Like this body, really like it.
But where are the fast primes. I was expecting at least a Lens Roadmap for the next 2 years, but nothing just a new all around lens which is for sure good for the system, but not enaugh IMHO.

Come on canon give me a 24 equiv f2.0, a 50 equiv f2.0 and an 85 f2.0 equiv and I drop my Fuji system.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 09:11 UTC as 61st comment | 6 replies
On article Sony Europe introduces a68 SLT with 79-point AF module (304 comments in total)
In reply to:

kape06111: DO not understand this. It would make more sense without the Translucent Mirror IMHO.
Nevertheless good news for the A-mount users.

The A7rii has already more than 300 phase detection focus points.

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2015 at 10:23 UTC
On article Sony Europe introduces a68 SLT with 79-point AF module (304 comments in total)

DO not understand this. It would make more sense without the Translucent Mirror IMHO.
Nevertheless good news for the A-mount users.

Link | Posted on Nov 5, 2015 at 21:28 UTC as 63rd comment | 4 replies
On article The big beast: hands on with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 (1290 comments in total)

I have this camera since one week and can only say:"I love it". The ergonomics is awsome, de viewfinder is big, clear and no lag, everything work flawless and really smooth and the sensor, i keep reading there is not that much improvement in comparison with the previous one, but under my expereince there is much more infromation in the files coming from Gx8 than the files coming from the E-M5II (my previous cam).

In general very happy, the only con i see until now is the function button located between the lens and the grip, it can be activated accidentally and depending on the funtion it has, it may be annoying.

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2015 at 11:19 UTC as 23rd comment | 1 reply

I really like this lens, and the only thing that keep me away from it is the missing focus scale.

Why did Voigtlander not include a focus scale on it? Come on it is a ML. It is a pity. it would be ideal for street ph.

Link | Posted on May 13, 2015 at 14:08 UTC as 4th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

D135ima: Good resolution ! Great lens ! But Sony still need a cheap normal focal leight AF lens - ordinary lens for resonable price.

May be the sony 28 f2fit in your description.

Link | Posted on May 11, 2015 at 21:18 UTC
On article Samsung NX1 Review (1262 comments in total)
In reply to:

kape06111: Why is there no size comparison, with other mirrorless camera. Or even with DSLR? I mean to have a better sense of the weight and volume.

I don´t care about weak, strong or whatever.
For me a comparison side by side is information. And I prefer to avoid going through thousands of website to search for it.

I cannot not see the point of discussion here. I would prefer to have a view of the size and that is.

Link | Posted on Apr 12, 2015 at 19:44 UTC
On article Samsung NX1 Review (1262 comments in total)
In reply to:

kape06111: Why is there no size comparison, with other mirrorless camera. Or even with DSLR? I mean to have a better sense of the weight and volume.

Why not? it is information, that may help someone to take a decision or even start looking at the camera.
And mainly today when the size is getting a big point.

Link | Posted on Apr 10, 2015 at 12:35 UTC
On article Samsung NX1 Review (1262 comments in total)

Why is there no size comparison, with other mirrorless camera. Or even with DSLR? I mean to have a better sense of the weight and volume.

Link | Posted on Apr 10, 2015 at 12:10 UTC as 186th comment | 9 replies
On article Sony Alpha a7 II Review (853 comments in total)

hey this time i don´t understand DPR reviewers at all. I was already starting to doubt about the objectivity of them previously (Nikon DF not Awarded, Canon 70D gold awarded , but the 7DmII just silver awarded, and the best Nikon D600 "Gold awarded and 87 points", being a camera with a lot of defects and replace 6 months later by Nikon because of that and you may continue mentioning cases).
Now the A7 II, This is the best mirrors camera out there, much better than the others A7s, A7 and A7r, Better ergonomic (Grip, shutter button position, more customizable buttons and better located, IMHo better body shape), much much better built quality, incorporate a really new feature (not just more Mpx, or more fPs), but Image stabilization in body, great low Iso performer, great EVF, great video capabilities (better that in the A7 and A7r). I don´t get it. in the examples, i much prefer the file of the A7II compare to the files from D750, just more detail there. Now i pretty i want a A7II.

Link | Posted on Apr 2, 2015 at 11:09 UTC as 111th comment | 9 replies
On article Sony a6000 Review (902 comments in total)
In reply to:

forggie5: I bought the a6000 camera body last month and have been so frustrated finding a good standard zoom lens for this e-mount camera. The 16-70mm seems like the one to go but I was hoping to get one with a 2.8 aperature. Is there a sigma or tamaron lens that would work better or some other lens that isn't over $2000? I don't want to regret moving from the canons but this hunt seems so much more difficult than anticipated, and I don't necessarily want to put an adapter on which would defeat the purpose of getting this lighter weighted camera as well. Any thoughts?

Try to use primes, better Image quality and less weight. Sony and Zeiss have nice and High quality primes for this system.

Link | Posted on Jan 29, 2015 at 15:38 UTC
Total: 14, showing: 1 – 14