ibanezac

Joined on Mar 12, 2012

Comments

Total: 36, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article Apple iPhone 13 Pro sample gallery (477 comments in total)
In reply to:

ashbashbeard: Still has the typical mushy, oversharpened smartphone look.

Sorry people, if you think computational trickery can overcome the physics of a tiny sensor, you're sorely mistaken. 2006 era APS-C cameras look better than this by a mile.

Correct!

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2021 at 21:11 UTC
On article Sony a7C review: Compact size, big sensor image quality (2217 comments in total)
In reply to:

Fotookes: Fro said it, and I'll repeat it: this is an a7III with its 'prisma' cut off!!! All that talk about compact size and travel camera and blablabla.... Rubbish! It is an a7III without the top!

Edwinrudolf@
''The A7S III has a whopping 759 phase and 425 contrast detection points. The phase detection points are the highest of any Sony A7/A9 cameras as of now.

The A7 III has 693 phase points and the same number of contrast detection points. Despite the lower number, the phase points on the A7 III cover a slightly larger area of the sensor (93% vs 92%).''

I would not shoot a wedding with A7C, or whatever professional job with one SD card.

Link | Posted on Oct 5, 2020 at 21:56 UTC
On article Sony a7C review: Compact size, big sensor image quality (2217 comments in total)
In reply to:

Fotookes: Fro said it, and I'll repeat it: this is an a7III with its 'prisma' cut off!!! All that talk about compact size and travel camera and blablabla.... Rubbish! It is an a7III without the top!

And one sd card :( Not even close to A7III.

Link | Posted on Oct 5, 2020 at 14:42 UTC

Ridiculously expensive. Not serious.

Link | Posted on Jul 9, 2020 at 10:03 UTC as 41st comment

Brilliantly stupid. What is the point to have a big thing that doesn't fit the pocket - but with a tiny sensor and a bad picture quality? Instead of this nonsense you can have a real camera taking the same space in your luggage. And a phone in your pocket, where it belongs.

Link | Posted on Jun 20, 2020 at 07:53 UTC as 16th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

ibanezac: 20-60mm F3.5-5.6, really???

@NowHearThis
Sounds fair enough from that point of view.

Link | Posted on May 28, 2020 at 12:32 UTC
In reply to:

ibanezac: 20-60mm F3.5-5.6, really???

Right, good luck with that.

Link | Posted on May 28, 2020 at 00:02 UTC
In reply to:

ibanezac: 20-60mm F3.5-5.6, really???

C'mon, f5.6, nowadays?

Link | Posted on May 27, 2020 at 21:21 UTC

20-60mm F3.5-5.6, really???

Link | Posted on May 27, 2020 at 20:15 UTC as 33rd comment | 10 replies
In reply to:

BrentSchumer: I'm not very excited. 50mm it's awkward on APSC, and Sony already sells a decent, affordable, and stabilized 50mm lens. Is this lens even stabilized?

If you want to break into E Mount APSC primes sell a stabilized 35mm with better quality than Sony's and some weather sealing. Or a higher quality pancake. Or an AF UWA prime. Or an AF macro. Etc.

Agreed 100%.

Link | Posted on Apr 16, 2020 at 00:00 UTC
In reply to:

Jefftan: there is already a Sony E 50mm F1.8 OSS
why duplicate?

Sony 50mm f1.8 can be found in mint condition for 100 eur. So this YN is a nonsense.

Link | Posted on Apr 15, 2020 at 23:59 UTC
In reply to:

ibanezac: And the price for Norwegian market is on - 1800 eur :(

The lowest price for 14.04.2020 is 17990 nok. It's around 1600 eur.

Link | Posted on Apr 15, 2020 at 01:13 UTC
In reply to:

ibanezac: And the price for Norwegian market is on - 1800 eur :(

Have no clue what is going on here. But the fact is that prices are going up for some reason.
Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 from 800 to 1200 eur.
Sony 70-300mm from 1100 eur to 1500 eur.
Sony 70-200mm F2.8 from 2400 eur to 2900 eur.
...

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2020 at 14:49 UTC

And the price for Norwegian market is on - 1800 eur :(

Link | Posted on Apr 10, 2020 at 11:56 UTC as 4th comment | 5 replies

I just can't believe wasted time and space on this nonsense.

Link | Posted on Apr 8, 2020 at 11:41 UTC as 13th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

C plus plus: Just saw there is no IS. Almost all A6x00 owners are out of luck. Sony IBIS isn't as good as others, so even A6500 and A6600 won't be able to shoot at slower shutter speeds like we see from other cameras at these focal lengths.

I can agree 100%. And can't wait to have this glass on my A7III. But using it on A6000 would not be a problem either.

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2020 at 15:56 UTC

Finally. Knowing Norwegian price politics it will be around 1500 eur here but it's worth!

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2020 at 15:16 UTC as 30th comment
In reply to:

C plus plus: Just saw there is no IS. Almost all A6x00 owners are out of luck. Sony IBIS isn't as good as others, so even A6500 and A6600 won't be able to shoot at slower shutter speeds like we see from other cameras at these focal lengths.

Go for ss/200. No probs.

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2020 at 15:15 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-A7 review (269 comments in total)
In reply to:

ibanezac: In picture comparison tool Sony A6000 have better image quality. And it's 6 years old.

Ho ho ho πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ You need new shampoo ;)

Link | Posted on Apr 2, 2020 at 19:08 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-A7 review (269 comments in total)
In reply to:

ibanezac: In picture comparison tool Sony A6000 have better image quality. And it's 6 years old.

Ricoh, Fuji, Sony, Canon, Nikon:
https://pdnonline.com/gear/cameras/the-best-cameras-for-color-reproduction-ranked/
If you can afford any.

Link | Posted on Apr 2, 2020 at 10:06 UTC
Total: 36, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »