Tord S Eriksson

Tord S Eriksson

Lives in Sweden Gothenburg, Sweden
Works as a bus driver/retired
Joined on Jul 3, 2003
About me:

Like to draw, paint, and photograph nature, and identified
flying 'objects', like the moon, bumblebees, aircraft, and, not least, birds!

Comments

Total: 533, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Buying a second lens: what lens should I buy next? (298 comments in total)
In reply to:

jimofcan: First lens purchased should always be a 70 - 200 2.8. There should actually be a law making it mandatory

The two kit lenses for the Nikon 1 cameras are 10-30 and 30-110, in Full Format (aka FX) terms 27-81mm, and 81-297mm, a very nice mix! The latter is an excellent macro lens, if you add a extension tube, or a few ;-) !

The first FX zoom lens I bought was a 70-300 VR, not a bad one (the newer versions are better, of course).

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2017 at 08:42 UTC
In reply to:

flashcactus: For those who might automatically rate the Hasselblad over the Fujifilm, it's important to remember that Fuji have had more serious and useful camera innovations, especially in the days of film, than Hasselblad's paltry record of rejigging their old leaf-shutter dependent box- a bit like the Porsche 911, having inbuilt limitations. Fuji : GX 680, brilliant. Best studio camera ever, conceptually. All the MF roll-film rangefinder variations, the Fuji/Hasselblad X-pan. This new MF mirrorless leapfrogs the opposition in the traditional Fuji way. Their way. Can't wait to try one.

No more Zeiss lenses?!

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2017 at 08:30 UTC
On article Lily Robotics sued over claims of false advertising (139 comments in total)

Reminds me of DPReview that used an A77S when making an informercial about another Sony camera, how good it was when actually it was not used for the drone scenes out over the water, which were decidedly awesome.

But we all were given the impression that the other camera was used — that must be called shady practices, too!

As stated above:

“Everyone in the market must follow the rules. By protecting consumers, we protect confidence in our system of commerce.”

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2017 at 16:47 UTC as 10th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

jerry7171: Before everyone piles on me, I'm making an observation on what seems to be a grey area.

In general, people have no right to an expectation of privacy in public areas. By extension, if a property owner/manager permits photography the same rule would apply. Isn't this how photographers are able to shoot candids and later sell their work? Do photographers chase after people they just shot in public areas to secure a signed release? What is the difference here?

I can understand the woman's point of view if she'd been photographed through a window in her home, but sitting within Chipotle's property?

We've been down this road before. We've all observed how people share everything online, but play the victim if someone else shares something that might have them in the background.

People like this woman ought to be shamed in public opinion for her self-indulgent attitude. It reminds me of the careless woman who put scalding hot coffee in her lap at McDonalds.

So Jerry, you would be at ease on figuring on their posters, with bottles of alcohol on your table, even if these are added afterwards, in photoshop, presumably?!

Link | Posted on Jan 12, 2017 at 00:19 UTC
In reply to:

Nikita66: US legal system is F-ed up.
US healthcare is F-ed up.
US foreign policy is F-ed up.
US debt is F-ed up.
US politics, in general, is F-ed up.

Every empire must fall.

"Every empire must fall"
Indeed, so when will Putin fall?!

Which country isn't 'f-ed up'?

Link | Posted on Jan 12, 2017 at 00:01 UTC
In reply to:

AbrasiveReducer: Of all the explanations why you should avoid fake lenses, the funniest has to be because they fail to meet safety standards. Nikon pulls this too. We're not talking about flash units. The danger in using these lenses is to your wallet and your images, not your safety.

BTW, the fakers have gotten more bold. I recently bought some Canon electronic cable releases that were too cheap to be genuine. They said Made in Japan, and I thought the counterfeiters would avoid flat-out lying about the point of origin. But in a world where news is fake, anything goes.

Germans were not famous for their perfect English, in the old days, before spell-checkers!

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2016 at 10:49 UTC
In reply to:

xpop: I own one of the first FZ2500 in france. I bought it after the "Salon de la photo" where I test it after lurking Olympus and Sony. Incredibly quicker than all other competitors. You have to deal with a 1" sensor, that mean some noise after 1600iso.

If you use DxO Optics Pro 11 to process your images, with noise-cancelling setting PRIME you'll have very little problem, if any, with the noise!

Link | Posted on Dec 11, 2016 at 14:05 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 Review (896 comments in total)
In reply to:

johnpendleton: I'd like to pick one of these up primarily for industrial video and non-work travel shooting, to replace my beloved but aging Fz150. The 150 has been a fantastic & trusty "operational" shooter, where ultimate web training video resolution rarely gets above 1280 x 720, and the 1000 looks like it would be a nice upgrade, even at that low bar.
But here's my question, DP-land: is this camera nearing the end of its product cycle? It's a two-year-old camera that's been sitting at $797 everywhere for a while now, supposedly due to the sensor delays from the Japanese earthquakes. But since this is Photokina season, has anyone heard anything about a replacement coming from Panasonic?

Nope, haven't heard a hint about an upgrade! Pity actually!

Link | Posted on Dec 11, 2016 at 13:43 UTC
On photo Grimeton LW antenna in Tord S Eriksson's photo gallery (3 comments in total)

Fixed!

I think there was nine of these antenna arrays around the world, sending encrypted (business) telegrams around the world.

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2016 at 17:02 UTC as 1st comment
On photo Grimeton LW antenna in Tord S Eriksson's photo gallery (3 comments in total)

Petrock,

Indeed, as it was opened in 1924: http://grimeton.org/?lang=en

I'll update it ASAP!

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2016 at 16:44 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

munro harrap: I would like a nikon adaptor that gives fast AF to manual lenses on full-frame Dslrs. This cannot even do that!!

How would it be able to give AF to manual lenses?! A little arm sticking out of the adapter turning the focusing ring?! Sounds like something out of a cartoon movie!

Link | Posted on Nov 29, 2016 at 12:18 UTC
In reply to:

flashcactus: For those who might automatically rate the Hasselblad over the Fujifilm, it's important to remember that Fuji have had more serious and useful camera innovations, especially in the days of film, than Hasselblad's paltry record of rejigging their old leaf-shutter dependent box- a bit like the Porsche 911, having inbuilt limitations. Fuji : GX 680, brilliant. Best studio camera ever, conceptually. All the MF roll-film rangefinder variations, the Fuji/Hasselblad X-pan. This new MF mirrorless leapfrogs the opposition in the traditional Fuji way. Their way. Can't wait to try one.

For many years Fuji manufactured the Hasselblad cameras, to Hasselblad's specifications. As far as I know they nowadays manufacture them here in Gothenburg, again.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2016 at 11:07 UTC
In reply to:

Triplet Perar: Construction-wise, is it better constructed than its predecessor? (50-200 and 55-300 lenses usually rattle a little; sometimes a simple touch on lens hood makes the image shift).

The HD DA55-300 is a very well made lens, the old DA55-300 was not!

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2016 at 20:27 UTC
In reply to:

Glen Barrington: Seven grand for a lens on a $400 camera . . . hmmm! Decisions, Decisions!

A Canon C700 cost a bit over $400 ,,,

Link | Posted on Sep 9, 2016 at 00:05 UTC
In reply to:

mais51: This news makes Leica and Zeiss lenses look cheap in comparison - so the German is not that bad after all - With lenses like these do we really need to buy a camera body at all - may come as a bonus with the package.

But very few Canikon users would be interested in manual lenses in the first place, so there is really no big market, so there is no point in making them cheaper, if there are enough customers willing to pay as it is!

Link | Posted on Sep 9, 2016 at 00:04 UTC
In reply to:

vscd: Pff. Made in Britain. ;)

https://www.formula1.com/en/championship/teams.html

Link | Posted on Sep 7, 2016 at 11:19 UTC
In reply to:

vscd: Pff. Made in Britain. ;)

@McScrooge:

I think it is an interesting fact that so many of the teams are based in the UK. Just look at the top of the leaderboard: Mercedes (based in the UK), Red Bull (also based in the UK), and Ferrari (Italy, at least for the moment)!

Link | Posted on Sep 7, 2016 at 11:11 UTC
In reply to:

vscd: Pff. Made in Britain. ;)

Most F1 cars are designed, made, and fine-tuned in the UK, no matter where they are supposed to be made. The brightest designers live in the UK, and the best builders, it is a sad fact.

I wish it was in Germany, or in Italy, but sadly not.

Link | Posted on Sep 6, 2016 at 21:38 UTC
In reply to:

Kamox: I didn't know this manufacturer... are they related to the man who invented the "triplet"?
The lenses seem carved out of steel, impressive.

http://www.cookeoptics.com/

A very old traditional lens making company, still thriving, whose lenses are loved by cinematographers around the world.

Link | Posted on Sep 6, 2016 at 21:35 UTC
In reply to:

naturetech: No Nikon 1-mount? I could use a set for my S1.

Sadly Nikon 1 is out of production, according to various sources. So no Cooke lenses, I'm afraid.

Link | Posted on Sep 6, 2016 at 21:33 UTC
Total: 533, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »