Zinch

I don't think is so easy. If that was true, I could print a wall size image from my phone (64 Mp), but I'm sure it would look very lame.

Without entering in the debate itself, what the industry wants you to buy is not a good indicator of a product being necessary or good in fact. FF is where the margins are. That's the every brand ...

Sure. I looked briefly if I can find it in english but I could. Is this: https://www.hofmann.es/tienda/album-digital/premium I used a 40% sale for a 58 page album. I'm not at home now. I'll add ...

I knew this was coming lol I think the size war is still in APS-C favour: https://j.mp/3ddQt5F It's obvious that if you are willing to spend more, a FF rig will have better IQ. But, how many people ...

Hi, Ok, I can see this creating a lively discussion. :) I've finaly have received a premium album I ordered some days ago. It's a pretty expensive (around 130€) one, but very beautiful. The page ...

Hi, Fujifilm has just released their 3rd quarter fiscal results (remember that Japanese fiscal year ends in March 31) and they are pretty good: they are winning money again. They explicitly say ...

Yeah, I think it's a combination of both things: a not perfect copy and the lure of a better option opticaly. I'm sure the Viltrox is pretty good (if you get a good copy) but I wanted the best ...

Yes, I have the latest FW. I guess in a studio the hit rate would be very high, but with a running kid (sometimes in a dim environment) it's not as high. I will get better, I'm sure (not all ...

For me, the f2 is not fast enough. It's a personal preference, but for half or whole body portraits, I think f1.4 or better make a difference. Also, the 56mm slowed down is crazy sharp (as I said), ...

No, sorry, now that I look at it it's not clear. I'm talking about the Viltrox 56mm and Fuji 56mm. The comment about the Fuji 23mm was just to put my collection for context (I haven't tryed the ...

Hi! I bought my X-T3 with the 16-80 in october 2020 and some days after I find a good offer for a 23mm f1.4. I needed a portrait lens and I looked a lot of reviews: I knew the fuji 56mm was a ...

You can find it for around 400€ in the grey market what is insane value if you ask me (I paid around 500€ for my copy with the X-T3 and it was a very good value already)

Having the same sensor and processor, I think Fuji put intentionaly the articulated screen on the X-T4 to cater to different customers than the X-T3. Very few would have upgraded anyway Withe the ...

I agree. Fuji can sell "expensive" cameras (1500-2000$). In fact, AFAIK the X-T4 has sold pretty well as has the X100V For me, is another reason I like Fuji: high end cameras that I can aspire to ...

People happy with a 100-200$ phone camera wasn't buying an ilc camera anyway

This has no sense. You are counting the size of the sensor 2 times. FF has a little more than 1 stop of lower noise than APS-C. Period. I don't know where are you looking for, but in the CIPA ...

The vast majory of those smartphones are 100-400$ with only decent cameras.

I'm not sure about this. I think the GFX line is already profitable and the 100S seems to be a great hit. Fuji doesn't need to sell a ton of MF cameras, the margin must be great enough so they can ...

We are discussing the future of Fuji X system. I think m43 has a very dark future, that's the reason I haven't included it in my post. But that is my point. Some people like to say that a FF rig is ...

The X-S10 is pretty small and feature rich. The X-T4 is heavier because it uses an old ibis system. The X-T5 will have a new unit that will weight less (at least as light as the one in the X-S10). ...