steven2874

Joined on Nov 3, 2011

Comments

Total: 12, showing: 1 – 12
On article Zeiss adds super-wide and tele- options to Milvus line (49 comments in total)
In reply to:

MikeGre: If I add a 1.4 or 2X teleconverter while adapting to a mft camera, that would reach out to mars very good.

So, there are intelligent posters here!

Link | Posted on Sep 9, 2016 at 14:18 UTC
On article Nikon D500 real-world sample gallery updated (68 comments in total)

Thanks for the sample photos. Nice variation and very informative.

Link | Posted on May 14, 2016 at 17:43 UTC as 11th comment
On article Nikon D500 real-world sample gallery updated (68 comments in total)
In reply to:

munro harrap: For the record in case you havent noticed the price of nrw cameras of this class has doubled: as with the a 6300 and the xpro2 . This d500 now costs new the same amount as TWO D800 bodies secondhand or a new D810 online.

What are nrw cameras?

Link | Posted on May 14, 2016 at 17:41 UTC
On article A lot to like: Real-world Leica Q gallery posted (341 comments in total)
In reply to:

steven2874: Rarely do I view an entire gallery posted here- but I did this time! Very nice images from the camera and photographer. Wish I had an extra 6K...

You're correct- both Adorama and B&H show 4250 US$. I was going by the 5999 shown by DPR for Amazon.

Link | Posted on Aug 31, 2015 at 15:06 UTC
On article A lot to like: Real-world Leica Q gallery posted (341 comments in total)

Rarely do I view an entire gallery posted here- but I did this time! Very nice images from the camera and photographer. Wish I had an extra 6K...

Link | Posted on Aug 31, 2015 at 13:22 UTC as 85th comment | 2 replies
On article Fujifilm X-T10 Review (497 comments in total)
In reply to:

arhmatic: I need to repeat, video quality is disappointing. Why repeat? I keep hearing the same "if you want good video quality, buy I video camera" - getting a second camera is not the answer.

The reasonable thing to do is for Fuji to get the video quality at the comparable level with everything else on the market. Not exceed, like the still image quality, just match the other offerings. Whatever the technical limitation with sensor and such, well, most simple users don't get and don't care, they simply want something comparable. Cheers!

brendon1000 wrote:
I personally know 3 people who very reluctantly sold their entire Fuji system mainly because they couldn't afford to maintain two systems.
Well, brendon1000,I personally know FOUR people who sold every device capable of recording video because they were sick and tired of thier wives taking videos of them drunk and showing the results on HD monitors!

Link | Posted on Aug 5, 2015 at 13:20 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T10 Review (497 comments in total)
In reply to:

utomo99: I hope Fuji try to fix some of the problems using firmware update. such as video quality and Burts

Frankly, they really need to fix the Franks first.

Link | Posted on Aug 5, 2015 at 13:08 UTC
In reply to:

Mike99999: 1) This lens should have been released together with the original D7000 back in 2010. The timing of this lens is baffling. First they kill DX by not releasing lenses and forcing everyone to m43 or full frame, then they release DX lenses. Great.

2) IQ is poor. The 17-55/2.8 is significantly better but has no size/weight advantage over full frame and lacks VR.

I guess everyone is better off with the Sigma 24-105 and a cheap full frame body.

I'm amazed that prople make statements like "I guess everyone is better off with the Sigma"... blather, blather, blather...
What unmitigated gall.

Link | Posted on Jul 28, 2015 at 16:30 UTC
In reply to:

baldeagle21b: Seems like a half-hearted effort on the part of DPR, and that's being generous. Imaging Resource has a much better interview.

The Pentax 15-450 zoom should have been an F1.4. Ricoh Imaging really missed the boat on this one.

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2015 at 13:52 UTC
In reply to:

Peter K Burian: OK, if the D810 images for comparison were made with the better f/1.4 lens, what lens was used for the D800 images?

If the latter were made with the cheap f/1.8 lens, the image comparison would no longer be valid.

The D800/E Df and D750 are showing they were shot with the 85 1.8G- the lens DPR has used on Nikon full-frame bodies for awhile now. At F5.6 the 1.8G and 1.4gG are probably pretty equal but if the lens is changed for one body it should be changed for all comparable Nikons. Unless DPR is hoping you'll upgrade to the D810 !

Link | Posted on Dec 22, 2014 at 23:32 UTC

Very depressing. Nikon eliminates even the peephole finder with the latest P7700 and Canon follows suit with the EOS-M and these two jokers.

Link | Posted on Aug 21, 2012 at 17:19 UTC as 37th comment | 1 reply
On article Variation Facts and Fallacies (230 comments in total)

Now if we could get you to compare a dozen or so Canon S100's...

Link | Posted on Nov 25, 2011 at 22:40 UTC as 110th comment
Total: 12, showing: 1 – 12