yomimoi

Thanks for these, I had missed your reply. Whatever you did to the A7III file, it made it slightly worse in several of the areas where it looked to retain more detail. However, note that it's the u ...

I want better than "more than good enough". As to it being that much cheaper as you suggest, I don't think so. It totally depends on your shooting needs, but some FF options provide many ...

I misunderstood your caption to the second photo. Indeed I don’t think it would, probably not even at base ISO. If I’m not mistaken, both X-H2/X-T5 suffer from rolling shutter; maybe less so than ...

Thanks for these, Erik, I think I'd seen them before? This is similar to what I'm getting, although I'm looking at ISO 6400 which is realistically the highest ISO setting I'll need/want to use on ...

Interesting. I see from your signature that you still have your X-T2. Would you consider posting a couple of low-light, ISO 6400 comparison shots with the same lens mounted on both cameras?

I'm not, seriously or jokingly, but I keep reading that here from some people: "negligible difference", "you have to look very closely"... well, no. I think the X-T2 at ISO 6400 was good enough in ...

I tried Topaz Denoise on the 6400 ISO RAW files from the XH2 in the studio comparison scene here and, while it made the image better, I couldn't for the life of me make it look as clean or ...

I think your point about being more careful about technique is quite important. It makes sense that a high pixel density sensor should be more demanding. As for the technique for pressing the ...

Did you check the studio scene comparison tool? Although X-T5 is not available yet, X-H2 is. As far as I can tell, the A7RIV image looks far more detailed and clean at every ISO value in pretty ...

I’m also wondering. Leaving AF aside, I want IBIS and the much better battery life of the X-T5, but I don’t want the much bigger files nor the slightly noisier images at high ISO. At this stage, ...

If I read your post correctly, the new 26 and 40 MP sensors can match, if processed properly (could you please elaborate?) the high ISO performance of old X-T and X-H cameras? Well, that’s my ...

Between those two focal lengths I’d find the 30 mm too tight. I sometimes use the old 27mm because it’s so light and small, and still find it too long for street. My personal preference for street ...

I'm not. In fact, I wasn't too happy to learn that the H2 and T5 were going to have a 40 Mpx sensor. For APS-C, I'd much rather have a sensor in the 26-30 Mpx range with improved performance at ...

Honestly, if absolute sharpness is critical, a tripod is a must, no matter how steady your hands are or how good your camera/lens stabilization may be.

Lol, again that assumption that any problems must be due to incompetence or laziness. This is not about the amazing pics you can get (you can get them with a lot of cameras, some way cheaper) but ...

I'm not ignoring them at all. I was making reference to them when I wrote that maybe it'd be more constructive to say: here's what I do and it works fine for me, rather than call everyone else ...

My browser shows about 60 threads on the 1st forum page, and only 4-6 are about AF. It's not even 10%. And all of those threads have plenty of positive posts and/or posts with interesting ...

No one is being forced to even read, let alone comment on this issue. When I'm tired of something, I just stop doing it or paying attention to it. Personally I'm more tired of people who for some ...

I've ended up sticking an " IBIS OFF! " warning on my quick release plates so I don't forget when I shoot on a tripod.

Exactly. So, if upgrading within the same system is going to take as much time and work to get such a basic feature as AF-C to work as advertised, for some users it can make more sense to invest ...