marco ricci

Joined on Apr 13, 2005

Comments

Total: 13, showing: 1 – 13
On article Fujifilm X-Pro2 firmware update 1.01 now available (76 comments in total)
In reply to:

marco ricci: i got few freezes during last weeks, hope it will fix it :)

how many shoots you have on your XP2?

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2016 at 11:37 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-Pro2 firmware update 1.01 now available (76 comments in total)

i got few freezes during last weeks, hope it will fix it :)

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2016 at 19:07 UTC as 14th comment | 3 replies
On article Worth the wait? A look inside the Pentax K-1 (651 comments in total)

i use a 645Z and in some situation i would like a smaller body. there are any converters in the market from 645 to pentax K, with electronic (af and aperture) support? thanks

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 19:54 UTC as 78th comment | 1 reply

i read somewhere about the new shutter button behaviour, actually is possible to half release the button and shoot again without refocus, it's true?

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2016 at 12:57 UTC as 30th comment

any chance to have a FUJI-X TTL / HSS trigger and support? any brand?

Link | Posted on Feb 1, 2016 at 21:26 UTC as 13th comment
In reply to:

NickyB66: Good to see the X Pro 2 RAW support now.

yes, but still the same muddy filiage and missinfg fine details. just tried to convert some X-Pro2 files from the DPR gallery

Link | Posted on Jan 28, 2016 at 16:05 UTC
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2501 comments in total)
In reply to:

marco ricci: I am missing something here. Initially i was thinking that the big boxes (13x13 surrounded by 104 small boxes) showed in this image http://1.static.img-dpreview.com/files/p/articles/7153829790/Images/AFpoints1.jpeg were the PDAF points and small boxes the CDAF points, but DPreview specs talks about 77. so were are the PDAF located?

in 77 AF points mode, again, we see big and small boxes, so not all the 77 active points are PDAF? thanks

Thanks. Please correct the x-pro2 announcement page, too. It still repost (text and specs) 77 pdaf points. Even other website report 77pdaf points. May be a fujifilm communication error?

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2016 at 15:33 UTC

AF system use 169 PDAF points, not 77.

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2016 at 12:26 UTC as 8th comment
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2501 comments in total)
In reply to:

marco ricci: I am missing something here. Initially i was thinking that the big boxes (13x13 surrounded by 104 small boxes) showed in this image http://1.static.img-dpreview.com/files/p/articles/7153829790/Images/AFpoints1.jpeg were the PDAF points and small boxes the CDAF points, but DPreview specs talks about 77. so were are the PDAF located?

in 77 AF points mode, again, we see big and small boxes, so not all the 77 active points are PDAF? thanks

so the big boxes are not PDAF? if i understand well only PDAF points work well with AFC tracking, et I think it will be really useful to know where they are located

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 20:59 UTC
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2501 comments in total)
In reply to:

Battersea: Why is the ISO pull up crown impractical? It seems like an elegant solution to adding an extra physical control. What am I missing about it?

it would be nice to have a "C" position like the Expcomp dial has, and assign iso selection to a button or a dial...

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 20:37 UTC
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2501 comments in total)

I am missing something here. Initially i was thinking that the big boxes (13x13 surrounded by 104 small boxes) showed in this image http://1.static.img-dpreview.com/files/p/articles/7153829790/Images/AFpoints1.jpeg were the PDAF points and small boxes the CDAF points, but DPreview specs talks about 77. so were are the PDAF located?

in 77 AF points mode, again, we see big and small boxes, so not all the 77 active points are PDAF? thanks

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 20:35 UTC as 461st comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

marco ricci: Fujifilm X-Pro1 support is same as before (color bleeding and smearing fine detail) and still no color profiles...

yes it's the same (same sensor) so X-E1 files will suffer the same problems :)

Link | Posted on Oct 3, 2012 at 19:25 UTC

Fujifilm X-Pro1 support is same as before (color bleeding and smearing fine detail) and still no color profiles...

Link | Posted on Oct 3, 2012 at 18:00 UTC as 30th comment | 8 replies
Total: 13, showing: 1 – 13