deep7

The Leica T is a wonderful camera, for sure, but it doesn't have a proper viewfinder so I wouldn't say the design was better. I do own one (with the Visoflex) and love it anyway.

Pretty much. Older versions only went to 1/300 or 1/500, so this is quite fast.

Like I say, they won't care what you think.

A camera like this will always be divisive. The people who want one and can afford one won't care. Personally, I love the style and concept but Android rules it right out. I'm sick of Google. ...

Now you mention it, the interface is a bit like on my Leica T. I have found that to be a wonderful camera to use, so maybe this Zeiss will be too?

The samples look promising. For example, in the dog photo, the grass looks pretty good right into the corners.

I recently bought their 35/1.4 and it's amazed me how good it is for the money. In...

nnanda: Apart from the terrible maths (four times less equals negative three times as much, which is nonsense) and the fact that both formats actually receive the same amount of light if depth of...

Welsh - I suppose that explains why you use a Phase One or Hasselblad?

Oh please, don't give Google yet another place to intrude! Computational photography doesn't have to use them.

I've had my RX10/4 for nearly three years. It still amazes me all the time - I just never feel like I need more and even sold off a lot of other gear since I bought it. A large part of that is...

It is interesting that 50mm became accepted as a "standard" focal length on 35mm cameras when 43mm is actually the point where there is no wide angle or telephoto effect. There are a few 45mm...

Now that was a fabulous lens!

There are some low light situations where my phone absolutely astounds me and I know I couldn't have got the photo with anything like an acceptable shutter speed and depth of field on any of my...

Leica was also part of the original 4/3 alliance. There was one Leica DSLR that used that mount. Micro 4/3 has seen more companies join in.

Panasonic and Leica are separate companies, DrCastle! ...

This would be fantastic for product or advertising photography. It's actually a perfect zoom range for taking photos of "things" where you want minimal distortion but some flexibility with viewing...

Very true. An actual answer to that two week old question!

BackToNature1: You know, that one step of aperture is pretty much irrelevant in a situation like this but the difference between a 200mm efl and a 600mm one is absolutely massive! Why would you go...

The place is more famous for tortoises than turtles...

Seeing he's scheduled the trip for 2022, my guess is that there will be plenty of time to do just that!

Great article, outlining some nice objective thinking and justifying your decision well. You've definitely saved weight over your ageing Canon kit and there will be less difference in real-world...