TerryV81

16-35 GM with crop-mode makes a very fine 16-52mm. My most used lens when I travel. I also use a 70-180 f2.8 (270 in crop-mode) as a secondary lens. With those two lenses I can cover almost...

So, if I understand correctly, RAW files quality (noise and DR) hasn't changed since 2016 for the mft format?

Low light will not be better with less MP. This myth has been debunked times and times again!

What are you talking about? There's nothing wrong with my monitor. You can get the exact same result on your screen if you put the same data on the studio scene. Change the Z9 for another body and...

The Z9 seems to retain the details very well but there are also some weird colours appearing especially on the "old lady" part of the image.

https://ibb.co/y8xyfWr

Why is that?

That's why the vast majority of wildlife photographers use FF gear despite the Olympus BS marketing towards them.

...for less than 2 seconds. Really useful...

Exactly like the sensors of 2016! How is that a good job?!?!

The good people of Olympus lied again and all their "visionaries" with them. What a surprise... I don't understand why people are still defending them.

As a m4/3 user I've always found Panasonic...

It seems that it's just the specs (again). I was expecting a real test now with comparison againt the G9 and OM-1.

If the higher isos are less noisy and the HHHR is indeed (much) better with moving subjects (like animals for instance where details and cropping is often important) it could become an interesting...

At these prices I honestly don't think people cross-shopping for these kind of cameras are ready to settle for "good enough" image quality. Maybe (rich) old folks but probably not the pros and...

I understand your point of view but why would I buy and carry three m4/3 f1.2 or 1.4 primes to replace one f2.8 ff zoom? As I said, the weight and price penalty is on mft when you take equivalence...

Problem is that one f2.8 ff zoom replaces many f1.2 m4/3 primes. In the end I think the weight and price penalty is more on the mft side but that's just how I thought of this.

The moment m4/3 has...

Problem is that one f2.8 ff zoom replaces many f1.2 m4/3 primes. In the end I think the weight and price penalty is more on the mft side but that's just how I thought of this.

The moment m4/3 has...

If it's indeed just jpeg noise reduction that's borderline lying to the customers IMO.

In theory those new techs shouldn't improve noise and DR that much I think. That's why I think those claims are weird.

It's weird that they claim a two stops improvement in noise and one stop in DR. That would be huge! The sensor needs to be tested. I suspect the performance are the same as the older sensors but...

I'm really interested in the tests. I couldn't care less about the FPS but I'm genually intrigued by the noise, DR and AF improvements.

If it's really up there with FF performance (noise, DR and...

Thank you but are you sure? Resolution is usually defined in MP isn't it? If I don't print but crop for zooming should I pay attention to resolution or pixel density?