BarnET

No thanks, that overpriced piece of thrash is only F6.3 at the long end. I'd rather take the cheaper older more versatile 55-300mm DX VR every...... Single....... Time! Or the 70-300mm VC from...

continuous AF at 5 fps just isn't good enough for people investing 4 grand in a sports camera.

So you'd have to be willing to reinvest in Sony glass.

Tamron's own 70-300mm lens is actually heavier then that. (probably a LOT better too)

You then need a 18-105 or even better a Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 to compliment it

Sigma loves to take your money with their 17-70mm F2.8-4 C (lovely walkarround lens btw)

With evolution scientists can prove how multiple species including our own have changed over the last millions of years.

It's backed up by DNA evidence fossils and retrieved bones.
The theory...

While evolution and vaccination is more or less set in stone.
We can't say the same about the climate change debate.

Which has been heavily politicized and is full of company interests which goes...

That would be VERY expensive (and very big) I sincerely hope that they extend the line of capable yet affordable easy to carry variable zoom lenses. Like the 55-200mm and 18-55mm we both own. I'd ...

No it won't. But with UW angle lenses that isn't a big deal. You can punch in to nail precise focus if need be. It does meter on the Fujifilm. Unlike similar lenses on Dslr's when looking through ...

Checkout the Samyang 12mm F2 as well. Pretty wide and probably the best UW lens for night time landscapes for Fujifilm. Yet still affordable. SOOC with Velvia film simulation

Then the 80mm 1:1 macro is mere months away

Wouldn't be any issue with the xt-20. As long as you have 3 batteries because you'd need to enable high performanse which limits the already limited battery life. quiet the contrary fuji has better ...

In terms of results in stills the Fujifilm wins. Especially straight out of camera when using it's film simulations. But it has a more retro control layout compared to the PASM set-up of the ...

The XT-20 has an easy to access auto mode. Beyond that the X-T20 and X-E2 are pretty similar in operation. So i don't understand why the X-E2 is good for beginners while the X-T20 is not in your ...

No footage will not blow away any alpha just like an Fs5/7 doesn't blow away let's say an A7s II in terms of footage.

In low light it's actually the opposite.

It will have FAR less jello. As...

People don't use raw for such boring events. (in video at least)

Raw gives flexibility. Great for contrasty scenes or for heavy grading.

This is usually done is smaller takes.

Difference in performance/features between the X-T20 and X-T2 is pretty small considering the difference in price. The Sony comes with a potato lens. The 18-105mm F4 is okayish. It does excel ...

I won't seems like a proper match to what's on the market.
Sure there will be a couple of trade-offs. Sony still has better slow-motion capability in 1080p by a fair margin for instance.

But Canon...

Because when you go to sturdier codecs that hold more colour information SD cards just don't cut it.

Which is why Sony uses XQD and Canon uses Cfast.
I'd say XQD is the better standard. But Canon...

Wow this is one major comeback after the bad joke that was the C100mk2.
Very impressive on paper!

Well Sony released a "affordable" 70-300mm in E-mount.
But damn they need new zooms. Take example of the 2 Fuji ones
18-55mm F2.8-4 and the 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 respectively