BarnET

You mean like the X-T20 and X-T2 already in their line-up?

Because versatility.

Personally i'd rather take the older Rx100 mk3 instead.
reasonable price and the faster lens makes a better companion to the capable yet limiting smallish 1 inch sensor.

No, by then you also have to include the LX10, LX100, G7x mk2, G5x and the Rx100 mk3 mk4 as well.

these are the small 1 inch models with more then 5x optical zoom so this is the round-up.

Well pun intended it is the elephant in the room.

But then the sheer quality it puts on the card requires a certain footprint.
I prefer a smaller total package. And went with Fujifilm...

Yes on the first question no on the second.

It's the usual BSI CMOS not the stacked one which was further enhanced with Pdaf later. Sony used this one in the Rx100 MK2 and MK3.

Not from me. Honestly I don't see Nikon's D5x00 series till now vastly underspecced. The NEX 5 used the same sensors throughout generations. And it didn't exceed competing Nikon's performance. If ...

They already made one. It's called the X100

" I'm a Fujifilm ambassador. I get early access to products for testing purposes. My opinions are my own, but they're as biased as they come ..."

Well at least he is open and upfront about it....

which is fine. Me and my partner did not enough video to justify having 2 systems. Fuji clearly provided better stills then the m43 set-up my girlfriend was using. She got frustrated we sold it all...

Brendon, or for people looking at getting a very good video file with interchangeable lenses in a neat small affordable package.

No one has beaten Panasonic's entry level m43 video hybrids like...

Affordable 4k camera's with interchangeable lenses are only available with m43 mount.

Sony A6300, X-T20 are simply more expensive. The Canon has such a massive crop just a bit more useful as 15...

We bitched when Canon excluded it from much more expensive or even top-end models.

Like the 6d mk2. 7d mk2, 80d, EOS M5.

This is a mid-entry to the system the equiv. of a Rebel T7i (but...

i like the LX10 personally.

Just pretend it's a 24-72mm F1.8-2.8 because at F1.4 it's pretty soft

Well the much larger Fz1000 has a maximum aperture of F4.
And with these relatively small sensors that does make a significant impact because despite being rather excellent ISO's still need to be...

No the front of the X-T20 is metal too the rear plate is plastic and the rear bottom half is plastic. While the front half is metal. Which if you pay attention does look a bit weird(slight ...

It has slightly better sharpness compared to bayer sensors with AA filters. However many no longer have those.

It also has less moiré then bayer sensors without those filters.

On the flipside...

I'd say 100-150.

The X-A5 is 599 with the 15-45mm
The X-T20 is 899 with the 16-50mm (and comes with various cashback deals now)

With an additional 200 it would be too close to the X-T20 which...

The Original X100 had a 12mp APSC Bayer sensor. The first camera using the X-trans colour array was the X100s or the X-pro which released a year later.

Then there have been compacts using the EXR...

Quiq,

The problem with the G3X wasn't the lens.

It was the lack off built-in EVF and outright atrocious shooting speed in Raw. 0.8 fps with AF servo is just too damn slow for a consumer...

Mike, That lens was a great achievement (It was a bit heavy though)

But indeed the sensor technology in there was already ancient when it released. Holding back it's potential.

The LX100 has a...