arhmatic

Lives in California
Works as a Architect
Joined on Mar 7, 2010

Comments

Total: 382, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Banhmi: Wow, these comparisons had ought to be pretty embarrassing for Apple. Google + Samsung phone-cameras are playing in a completely different league!

Reminds me of the shock I received the 1st time I came on DPR to compare my point-and-shoot's image results to that of a DSLR.

iPhone are not only average as cameras, but also completely lacking any camera setting options.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2016 at 17:00 UTC
In reply to:

great Javier: iPhone 7 killer

I did not realize that iPhone was even considered a competitor here...

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2016 at 16:58 UTC

One thing I like - it does not scream "camera bag" that tourists carry around, then whine when getting robbed... It does look expensive, so you are a target anyway. Best thing - get a camera insert and put your stuff in any bag you want.

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2016 at 19:45 UTC as 37th comment | 1 reply
On article Google's Pixel phones: What you need to know (122 comments in total)

I am curious why this is named "pixel" but one thing I do appreciate, it does not have some random characters as a name.

Link | Posted on Oct 5, 2016 at 19:26 UTC as 20th comment | 3 replies
On article DJI goes portable with the Mavic Pro (162 comments in total)
In reply to:

arhmatic: Anyone - FOV equivalency? Irrelevant to many, but #1 question to me... Thanks!

Thanks! Found the specs on a different website. I wish they were part of this article.
Highlight Distortion: < 1.5% - this gets me really excited!

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2016 at 18:00 UTC
On article DJI goes portable with the Mavic Pro (162 comments in total)

Anyone - FOV equivalency? Irrelevant to many, but #1 question to me... Thanks!

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2016 at 16:13 UTC as 21st comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

Tizzio: I know its a prototype, but still...body design looks crude and butt ugly!

@Hellraiser - same with a BMW. It's a car, it just need to drive. But if it had wood benches instead of leather seats, you might think twice... it still runs from A to B right?

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 17:04 UTC
In reply to:

Tizzio: I know its a prototype, but still...body design looks crude and butt ugly!

Could use a complete redesign before full release.
Nothing hideous to look at, but nowhere near the Hasselblad.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 23:52 UTC
On article Photokina 2016: Hands-on with Olympus OM-D E-M1 II (654 comments in total)
In reply to:

arhmatic: Maybe it's just me, but "OM-D E-M1 II" (12 characters total) is a little of an overkill... Why put "E-"? Is there a "non E-" M1? Sure, all letters mean something, but do I care as a buyer? Look at car naming. "Audi Q5" is easy. "Olympus M2" is similarly easy.

This applies, in my mind, to all camera makers. Not picking just Olympus in particular. 2-3 characters would do just fine. Just a suggestion. For simplicity and ease. Win-win for all.

In about 5 years, Olympus will release the medium format version of the legendary OM-D E-M.

It will be called Olympus "OM-D E-M1 6x6MF"... Every letter means something, so deal with it!

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 20:29 UTC
On article Photokina 2016: Hands-on with Olympus OM-D E-M1 II (654 comments in total)
In reply to:

arhmatic: Maybe it's just me, but "OM-D E-M1 II" (12 characters total) is a little of an overkill... Why put "E-"? Is there a "non E-" M1? Sure, all letters mean something, but do I care as a buyer? Look at car naming. "Audi Q5" is easy. "Olympus M2" is similarly easy.

This applies, in my mind, to all camera makers. Not picking just Olympus in particular. 2-3 characters would do just fine. Just a suggestion. For simplicity and ease. Win-win for all.

I have an Indian friend named "Balasubramaniam" but he introduces himself "Bala". No further comment needed.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 16:13 UTC
On article Photokina 2016: Hands-on with Olympus OM-D E-M1 II (654 comments in total)
In reply to:

arhmatic: Maybe it's just me, but "OM-D E-M1 II" (12 characters total) is a little of an overkill... Why put "E-"? Is there a "non E-" M1? Sure, all letters mean something, but do I care as a buyer? Look at car naming. "Audi Q5" is easy. "Olympus M2" is similarly easy.

This applies, in my mind, to all camera makers. Not picking just Olympus in particular. 2-3 characters would do just fine. Just a suggestion. For simplicity and ease. Win-win for all.

@Revenant yes, every single letter means something to someone, but it means zero to me. "BMW M3" is all I want to say and "M3" says it all...

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 15:59 UTC

Great camera and specs, I am sure it took millions of $$$ to develop. For a fraction of this, Fujifilm please hire a good graphic/industrial designer to add some finer touches to this. Such as the engravings on the ISO dial - A and C positions are just butt ugly and crowded. Show a little style... If this is intended for true artists with a sharp eye, this does matter. The added cost to you is probably .1%, the impact is significant.

Go ahead and vote me down, but this just basic attention to details that I'd expect from Fujifilm...

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 15:55 UTC as 103rd comment | 3 replies
On article Photokina 2016: Hands-on with Olympus OM-D E-M1 II (654 comments in total)

Maybe it's just me, but "OM-D E-M1 II" (12 characters total) is a little of an overkill... Why put "E-"? Is there a "non E-" M1? Sure, all letters mean something, but do I care as a buyer? Look at car naming. "Audi Q5" is easy. "Olympus M2" is similarly easy.

This applies, in my mind, to all camera makers. Not picking just Olympus in particular. 2-3 characters would do just fine. Just a suggestion. For simplicity and ease. Win-win for all.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 15:41 UTC as 90th comment | 16 replies
In reply to:

kristof93: 1.7x larger sensor (and relatively low resolution) isn't really worth all the hassle this brings over well developed FF systems that have brighter lenses anyway.

yes and no... with the same pixel count and larger sensor area, the pixel density is reduced. Theoretically, this should result in cleaner ISO.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 23:28 UTC
In reply to:

kristof93: 1.7x larger sensor (and relatively low resolution) isn't really worth all the hassle this brings over well developed FF systems that have brighter lenses anyway.

"relatively low" is still way way over what I need...

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 23:22 UTC
On article Metz mecablitz M400 flash unveiled at Photokina (45 comments in total)
In reply to:

nicolaiecostel: The 1970's called, they want their flash back :)))

The only reason I want a flash shaped like a 2016 melted soap bar is... you know... Otherwise, simple and square is the way. Nice and minimalist design from Metz, it's a buy from me.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 20:29 UTC
In reply to:

arhmatic: It's a beautiful world out there. Why are we letting greedy white corporate people destroy it?

What? Don't let *anyone* destroy it. I want my grandkids to see images like the one with the polar bear, in real life. Not in a history magazine...

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 00:38 UTC

It's a beautiful world out there. Why are we letting greedy white corporate people destroy it?

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2016 at 21:50 UTC as 6th comment | 3 replies
On article Apple unveils iPhone 7 and dual-cam iPhone 7 Plus (916 comments in total)
In reply to:

otto k: Won't anyone make a phone just 3mm thicker? Really, I don't care about 7mm vs 10mm. It would allow for a better camera (enough with 1/3" and the like), a normal xenon flash (LED flash? Yeah, right) and a bigger battery... Plus easier to cool so faster in operation.

Pretty please with a cherry on the top?

I've always thought that this thin devices are just dumb. Sacrifice everything for what?

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2016 at 04:26 UTC
On article 2016 Roundup: 4K action cameras (102 comments in total)
In reply to:

Favorable Exponynt: A side to side price and specs comparison would be nice

Precisely, and the first item I'd look for, in a review like this. Because it gives you half the info you need in just seconds...

Link | Posted on Sep 6, 2016 at 00:55 UTC
Total: 382, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »