arhmatic

Lives in California
Works as a Architect
Joined on Mar 7, 2010

Comments

Total: 375, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article A comfortable fit: Panasonic Lumix GX850 overview (117 comments in total)
In reply to:

GodSpeaks: Ok Panasonic, enough is enough. No more G, X, 8, 5, 0 letter/number combinations for naming cameras. This has gone beyond stupid.

Newsflash Panasonic! Nobody cares, everyone is confused.

Just do one letter for the line and one number for the sequence.
Not even "lumix" - nobody cares what that is.

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2017 at 21:14 UTC
On article A comfortable fit: Panasonic Lumix GX850 overview (117 comments in total)
In reply to:

arhmatic: Who names these cameras? You are totally confusing the buyers.

Why not just do one letter (for the series) and one number (for the sequence) and call it done. TWO CHARACTERS! This applies to most camera makers. Olympus seems even worse.

@Revenant I though their scope is to sell stuff...

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2017 at 21:08 UTC
On article A comfortable fit: Panasonic Lumix GX850 overview (117 comments in total)

Who names these cameras? You are totally confusing the buyers.

Why not just do one letter (for the series) and one number (for the sequence) and call it done. TWO CHARACTERS! This applies to most camera makers. Olympus seems even worse.

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2017 at 17:44 UTC as 15th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

io_bg: Now why do they call the same camera three different names in various markets? Makes zero sense to me.

"Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850 (Lumix DMC-GX800 / Lumix DMC-GF9)"

I have no idea what to order... All I wanted is a letter+number (one each)

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2017 at 17:41 UTC
In reply to:

arhmatic: My ex was surprised on my Fujifilm selection and insisted that I get a Nikon or Canon for our vacation together...
Yada, yada, yada, she is my ex now...

@Christmas ball - which is way better than a dumb piece of meat.

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2017 at 20:06 UTC
In reply to:

arhmatic: My ex was surprised on my Fujifilm selection and insisted that I get a Nikon or Canon for our vacation together...
Yada, yada, yada, she is my ex now...

@Christmas ball - You got it wrong. I prefer brains or nothing.

Link | Posted on Dec 29, 2016 at 00:03 UTC

My ex was surprised on my Fujifilm selection and insisted that I get a Nikon or Canon for our vacation together...
Yada, yada, yada, she is my ex now...

Link | Posted on Dec 28, 2016 at 20:31 UTC as 307th comment | 7 replies

Apple needs to put some effort into adding some sort of controls on the camera app.

I know, "you can just get a $2 app" as a camera app, but the question remains - why is apple so stubborn and obnoxious about this?

Link | Posted on Dec 27, 2016 at 22:22 UTC as 34th comment | 2 replies
On article Happy Holidays from DPReview (150 comments in total)

Great to see that men's facial hair is highly fashionable up in Seattle. Merry Christmas!

Link | Posted on Dec 25, 2016 at 19:13 UTC as 83rd comment
In reply to:

Gavril Margittai: I am not sure it is in the interest of the free world to popularize the picture of the assassin (professional photographer or not). But this is just my personal opinion.

Let's remember why this all started... why are we even here? You popularize the war, but not the side effects?

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2016 at 19:52 UTC

Everyone reading this at "dpreveiw" should be aware that a simple "typo" might be sufficient to dupe buyers/readers.

Link | Posted on Dec 16, 2016 at 22:06 UTC as 65th comment

I tried the bar in the apple store. Too crammed and small to be useful for fast workflow...

It should be at least twice as tall, so you can use it without hunting... just like a keyboard. The size is really a remnant from the old FN keys. I though apple can be a little more creative...

Link | Posted on Dec 13, 2016 at 23:07 UTC as 19th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

arhmatic: The User Interface is a significant part of the shooting experience. I am glad to see Haselblad giving this proper attention. I hope all others would follow. Fujifilm you too!

If you are an UI designer, or a designer of any type, you need to be aware of people's needs. Functionality is one, but beauty is important. It's tech, it's art. So it's your job, do it right.

Sony, Fujifilm, everyone else... especially if the UI is really a software items, can be improved anytime once you have the hardware platform. Same with the remote camera app. Do it!

Link | Posted on Dec 12, 2016 at 21:56 UTC

The User Interface is a significant part of the shooting experience. I am glad to see Haselblad giving this proper attention. I hope all others would follow. Fujifilm you too!

Link | Posted on Dec 12, 2016 at 17:17 UTC as 87th comment | 3 replies

Passport saying "European Union" not included, right?

Link | Posted on Dec 5, 2016 at 19:52 UTC as 17th comment | 2 replies
On article Fujifilm launches X-A10 as entry-level X-series model (166 comments in total)
In reply to:

Thorgrem: Fuji really needs to make a smaller (maybe pancake) standard zoom. This is to big for the target audience.

Yes please. Fuji needs some pancake lenses. I second that! In the size of similar Panasonic lens.

Link | Posted on Dec 3, 2016 at 01:35 UTC

Meanwhile, today's cameras... Seriously, when do camera makers start making timeless pieces again?

Link | Posted on Nov 30, 2016 at 22:59 UTC as 24th comment | 4 replies
On article Venus Laowa 12mm F2.8 Zero-D sample gallery (124 comments in total)
In reply to:

D Gold: DPReview,

Any idea how coma is handled with this lens?

@darngooddesign @Photophile - there is no joke on coma

Link | Posted on Nov 30, 2016 at 17:10 UTC
On article Ultimate OM-D: Olympus E-M1 Mark II Review (1333 comments in total)
In reply to:

FarHagh: A $2000, 20MP M43? I would prefer a 12MP at $1200! OK, $1500 but the point is the pixel size would then be around D500's.

how is that relevant to photography?

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2016 at 23:41 UTC
On article Next level: iPhone 7 Plus camera review (189 comments in total)
In reply to:

arhmatic: What about in terms of "features"? This camera completely lacks any form of manual control that actually make a camera... no WB, ISO setting and such... This is only a comparable in terms of pixel peeping, if any, and I am NOT impressed...

@mandophoto --- So apple is not in the business of making cameras, so it's ok if they sell you a dumbed-down version of a camera... Makes sense...

I am not in the business of making cars, but if I do make one, it will come with thee wheels.

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2016 at 22:21 UTC
Total: 375, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »