jaykumarr

Lives in United States Baltimore, NJ, United States
Works as a s/w
Joined on Jul 14, 2006

Comments

Total: 355, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
In reply to:

jaykumarr: Is there anyway to use this with no Adobe photoshop or any other software?

For example, if I have a new Mac with factory setup, with no software, how I can use this suite?

thanks for helping out my ignorance.

thanks

Link | Posted on Mar 27, 2016 at 06:26 UTC
In reply to:

Macromind: Total waste of time. No indication as to how to import pictures. "Help" useless.
Communication as to use not available. My trial is over! CS6 and NX are still AOK with me.

Sonyshine,
that is very harsh. ignorance is what all of the world have. The ignorance about history, cultures, truth, food , meat or more serious than using little software you are pointing out.

Link | Posted on Mar 26, 2016 at 14:08 UTC

Is there anyway to use this with no Adobe photoshop or any other software?

For example, if I have a new Mac with factory setup, with no software, how I can use this suite?

thanks for helping out my ignorance.

Link | Posted on Mar 26, 2016 at 14:05 UTC as 43rd comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Jonathan F/2: The D7200 is even more impressive. At this rate of improvement, the D500 should be a DR and high ISO beast next to Canon and the rest of the APS-C competition. Fuji being a close 2nd place. No doubt in the mirrorless arena Fuji is top dog for APS-C!

@EDWARD,
What ever you wrote is NA for the those who you think as recipients. Your writings are applicable to you. You have to lol at yourself and mock yourself.

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2016 at 20:19 UTC
In reply to:

Jonathan F/2: The D7200 is even more impressive. At this rate of improvement, the D500 should be a DR and high ISO beast next to Canon and the rest of the APS-C competition. Fuji being a close 2nd place. No doubt in the mirrorless arena Fuji is top dog for APS-C!

@EDWARD 6D is very unclean very noisy in one to one comparison with D7200 . 6D is noisier than 80D too. While 80D is superb improvement, it looses against D7200 by some margin.

Link | Posted on Mar 23, 2016 at 18:05 UTC
In reply to:

Sean65: Interesting results when you select the Olympus M5ii to compare.

That is because you see +0EV comparison in olympus, while canon is set to +5EV. Set both to same.

Link | Posted on Mar 22, 2016 at 19:58 UTC
In reply to:

jaykumarr: Engineering Manager: "we fixed the problem that was slowing down the focus by 50%"
Marketing Manager: "Our fix made focus faster by 50%" . So buy dock from us.

I know 33% failure fix is 50% improvement. But when you want other people to laugh, we say jokes, not mathematically correct statements, that would take 2 seconds thinking time before lol.

About returning docker after using, I thought we South Asians only do that. I understand it is borderless phenomena.

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2016 at 18:29 UTC
In reply to:

pshummer: AF speed of my Sigma 150-600 C has substantially improved after I installed the new firmware update by a Sigma dock. Nikon/Canon should follow the Sigma's idea. The Sigma dock is such a huge time saver.

Was yours slow previously?

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2016 at 02:24 UTC

Engineering Manager: "we fixed the problem that was slowing down the focus by 50%"
Marketing Manager: "Our fix made focus faster by 50%" . So buy dock from us.

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2016 at 02:23 UTC as 22nd comment | 10 replies
In reply to:

jaykumarr: A very good detailed review indeed.

I have a doubt. Tamron 150-600 resolves 1700 lines at 600mm F8.0 while this resolves 2100 lines at 400 mm F8.0. That means, still Tamron would resolve about 15% better. Is that a better choice for tele end? (of course, the output quality will be still better in this one due to low CA, accurate focus). http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/lens-compare-fullscreen?compare=true&lensId=canon_100-400_4p5-5p6_ii&cameraId=canon_eos5dmkiii&version=0&fl=400&av=8&view=mtf-ca&lensId2=tamron_150-600_5-6p3_vc&cameraId2=canon_eos5dmkiii&version2=0&fl2=400&av2=8

I thought my camera had problem, so i gave to my friend, and the return period passed. However, I sold it back to KEH camera for 200$ less. (I did not want to sell to someone else and cheat)

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2016 at 06:26 UTC
In reply to:

jaykumarr: A very good detailed review indeed.

I have a doubt. Tamron 150-600 resolves 1700 lines at 600mm F8.0 while this resolves 2100 lines at 400 mm F8.0. That means, still Tamron would resolve about 15% better. Is that a better choice for tele end? (of course, the output quality will be still better in this one due to low CA, accurate focus). http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/lens-compare-fullscreen?compare=true&lensId=canon_100-400_4p5-5p6_ii&cameraId=canon_eos5dmkiii&version=0&fl=400&av=8&view=mtf-ca&lensId2=tamron_150-600_5-6p3_vc&cameraId2=canon_eos5dmkiii&version2=0&fl2=400&av2=8

thanks for explaining.

Link | Posted on Mar 6, 2016 at 07:34 UTC
In reply to:

jaykumarr: A very good detailed review indeed.

I have a doubt. Tamron 150-600 resolves 1700 lines at 600mm F8.0 while this resolves 2100 lines at 400 mm F8.0. That means, still Tamron would resolve about 15% better. Is that a better choice for tele end? (of course, the output quality will be still better in this one due to low CA, accurate focus). http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/lens-compare-fullscreen?compare=true&lensId=canon_100-400_4p5-5p6_ii&cameraId=canon_eos5dmkiii&version=0&fl=400&av=8&view=mtf-ca&lensId2=tamron_150-600_5-6p3_vc&cameraId2=canon_eos5dmkiii&version2=0&fl2=400&av2=8

heheh... so you are saying 3 KG Sigma is better than 2 KG Tamron? Though isolated incident, I bought a Sigma 100-300 mm F4 (used) from KEH which had poor resolution and consistently missed focus. May be my digital rebel camera is too old, I am not sure what to blame, but I know sigma is not worth it weight.

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2016 at 16:51 UTC

A very good detailed review indeed.

I have a doubt. Tamron 150-600 resolves 1700 lines at 600mm F8.0 while this resolves 2100 lines at 400 mm F8.0. That means, still Tamron would resolve about 15% better. Is that a better choice for tele end? (of course, the output quality will be still better in this one due to low CA, accurate focus). http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/lens-compare-fullscreen?compare=true&lensId=canon_100-400_4p5-5p6_ii&cameraId=canon_eos5dmkiii&version=0&fl=400&av=8&view=mtf-ca&lensId2=tamron_150-600_5-6p3_vc&cameraId2=canon_eos5dmkiii&version2=0&fl2=400&av2=8

Link | Posted on Mar 3, 2016 at 07:18 UTC as 25th comment | 7 replies

// After 15 long years, Canon finally upgraded one of the biggest-selling telezooms of all time - the 100-400mm F4.5-5.6L IS USM.//
And dpreview is reviewing well past 1 year in the market?

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2016 at 19:36 UTC as 68th comment
On article Newly enthused: hands on with the Canon EOS 80D (680 comments in total)
In reply to:

jaykumarr: silver award.

Reason: Noise and HDR lacking behind competition.

@Az..
do you want me to wait and predict after the sensor is tested and dpriview published the review?

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2016 at 19:59 UTC
On article Newly enthused: hands on with the Canon EOS 80D (680 comments in total)

silver award.

Reason: Noise and HDR lacking behind competition.

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2016 at 08:39 UTC as 30th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Nukunukoo: The biggest problem with organic sensors is that the bigger the sensor the more heat it generates which significantly reduces its usable lifetime. This is the reason the first applications will be on small mobile devices. The OPF layer is very intolerant to higher temps. Still, the science has game changing potentials and I am excited when it comes to more mainstream use years from now.

That s what panasonic wants.. so you buy a new camera every two years

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 21:49 UTC
In reply to:

MaxFury: I pray to Zeus everyday for a cure that will eliminate the Rolling Shutter plague.
Hopefully we will see Panasonic implement this in their new photo and video cameras in the future.

I was praying Sun god too

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 21:48 UTC

I was not able to understand 50% it first. After looking at diagrams, I understood them all !! thanks for graphic dpreview. Hope USDA will certify it Organic too.

So, should I wait for FZ-1000 successor with this sensor? how long will it take for this invention to reach sales?

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 20:21 UTC as 56th comment | 2 replies
On photo Rainbow colours. in the Macro - Colours! challenge (1 comment in total)

aint macro

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 20:00 UTC as 1st comment
Total: 355, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »