jaykumarr

Lives in United States Baltimore, NJ, United States
Works as a s/w
Joined on Jul 14, 2006

Comments

Total: 380, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Extremely dramatic video touts Canon's CMOS technology (189 comments in total)
In reply to:

Artpt: Promising technology...though a bit of "macho business donkey wrestler" (You Tube it)....lost in translation.

there is no technology whatsoever. It is old.

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2017 at 15:01 UTC
On article New Canon EOS 77D sits between Rebel T7i and EOS 80D (50 comments in total)
In reply to:

OlyPent: Is $850 too much to ask for "pentamirrors" and 6fps these days?

@OlyPent,
Does Nikon do?
I think 6fps is there in both of these T7i, 77D .

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2017 at 01:56 UTC
On article Sony SLT a99 II Review (1474 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ralf B: This post https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/59120737 says enough.

What that post claims is true only if there is NO other instance where the camera was not focussing well when subject is in the center.
As well the player may have moved 3 inches away just after focus acquisition, so that sample is not a solid proof.

Link | Posted on Feb 14, 2017 at 00:09 UTC
On photo Heels On board in the Aircraft interior challenge (1 comment in total)

where are the other two legs?

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2017 at 05:02 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

AngularJS: Great lens and great photographers :) For the price the lens is actually amazing.
How fast is the AF compared to the L version? Just wondering how efficient is the new Nano USM...

@jivagrahpy, why people who praise something, neither have a sample shot nor have their gallery in dpreview?

Link | Posted on Feb 10, 2017 at 19:06 UTC

selfies as a tool? in my workplace people use selfish as a tool.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2017 at 06:47 UTC as 2nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Robemo: It's a bit confusing review which contains some errors/bad choices:

1. The comparison at 400mm shows that the Panasonic focused on the orange crane, the Sony on the white building behind it, making that comparison useless.
2. Why using JPEG's to compare lens quality in the comparison tool? JPEG rendering has never been Panasonics strong point. When you download the RAW files and process them equally, you will find the difference less shocking and at some focal ranges (around 135mm for instance) far less than the JPEG's suggest.

In general (and DPR has mentioned it in other reviews) lenses are the weak spot of these 1 inch high density small sensor cameras with complex zooms. Lenses are strained a lot. DPR mentioned in other reviews (of Sony RX100 models I think) how much trouble it took them to find a review model with a proper lens. Lots of fluctuations in lens performance. That's probably why Sony spent so much effort/money in the RX10 III lens.

Very very good observation @Robemo. I think this different focus points exacerbated the FZ-2500's performance, which originally created bad performance with bad copy.

@DPreivew may please do lens comparison as well in studio shot for different focal lengths and update them. ( I know you need really long studio for that and may not be possible). If not, this lens comparison should be done again with touch screen focus to the same point confirmed.

Link | Posted on Jan 20, 2017 at 00:49 UTC
In reply to:

JordanAT: On paper, as a still camera, this looks like a rebadge and a price bump. Similar lens (range, aperture), same sensor, same size, same battery life, same sensitivity, frame rate, and shutter speed range, and a bit heaver. So, for still photogs, they're adding a touchscreen for $400?

@JordanAT,
the latest review proved your points are correct.
@Photomonkey,
Unfortunately the camera failed to impress in video too, having smaller area creating sampled pixels. And as NetMage told it is already there.

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2017 at 18:53 UTC

And Panasonic wants $99 extra for V-Log L with lower quality 4K output?

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2017 at 07:59 UTC as 39th comment
In reply to:

Ignacio Yuba: I was really expecting this review as a potential buyer. Now that we have the review i am really dissapointed with it. If you are writing about the pros and cons of a camera, i think that you have to do it based on the most objective perspective that you can achieve and not comparing it on the whole article with another camera. For instance, the crop factor in 4K video is 1.43. It's good or bad on it's own and depending on the user's needs but is not good or bad because the Sony RX100 III's crop factor is 1.09. With all the available information, the reader must decide the best camera for it's needs. I'm not saying that the author was writing against Panasonic in any way but I think that he was dazzled by the RX10 III and he thought that he needed to mention it on every aspect of the review.

Ignacio Yuba,
I share your feelings. But Jeff called a spade, a spade. Jeff has tendency to give importance to fine details and textures in all reviews. Sony RX 10-III see to be having 4K video quality equalling Nikon D500, bettering Canon M5 in detail.
On the other hand, I see that this FZ-2500 is not having any of sharpness/saturation/lens of FZ-1000. I think keeping RX 10-III aside and pulling the FZ-1000 into comparison would bring the same results for FZ-2500 albeit, FZ-1000 would have become winner and not RX10 - III.

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2017 at 03:09 UTC
In reply to:

junk1: Is this any more reckless than people playing baseball in a neighborhood? Ever get hit by a baseball in the head? Or imagine what a baseball could do to a window or siding. Would we charge the person with reckless endangerment? I'd rather have a drone hit me than a baseball "line drive".

So DSPographer , you believe a bullet or a bronze weight of 100 gms will have less impact than a drone at same speed?

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2017 at 22:50 UTC
On photo Kingfisher in the An A to Z of Subjects- Week 11, K challenge (10 comments in total)

beautiful, with less pp .

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2017 at 00:24 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

jaykumarr: already 1 GB 2GB flash drives are here : http://www.zdnet.com/article/ces-2017-kingston-unveils-worlds-highest-capacity-usb-flash-drive/ .. But this one is slightly different, but nothing of 'outstanding class'

True. And SSD must be more reliable ( I have some Kingstons,Transcends and few SanDisk SD cards go bad, not writable etc ).

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2017 at 22:25 UTC

already 1 GB 2GB flash drives are here : http://www.zdnet.com/article/ces-2017-kingston-unveils-worlds-highest-capacity-usb-flash-drive/ .. But this one is slightly different, but nothing of 'outstanding class'

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2017 at 20:03 UTC as 21st comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

jaykumarr: Could someone please help me:
What are the top features that Magic Lantern provide that are absent/incomplete in
(1) Latest consumer level Nikon SLRs
(2) Latest consumer level Canon SLRs
Are those missing features present in their remote controllers?

thanks for excellent answers.
Jylppy your answer is very detailed. thanks a lot.

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2017 at 08:09 UTC
On photo copper rumped humming bird in the Best Wildlife Photo of the Week VII challenge (6 comments in total)

what do you mean by "attach any other bird?" sex ? :-)

Fantastic high iso shot. You and camera did a great job .

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2017 at 20:57 UTC as 1st comment

Could someone please help me:
What are the top features that Magic Lantern provide that are absent/incomplete in
(1) Latest consumer level Nikon SLRs
(2) Latest consumer level Canon SLRs
Are those missing features present in their remote controllers?

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2017 at 20:56 UTC as 20th comment | 6 replies

why it is a graphic image? even babies will not be shocked seeing this.

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2016 at 22:17 UTC as 144th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Abdallah II: yes the world also needs a professional areal photographer to bring us a photo of a bomber plane because a photo of a fighter pilot who pulls a trigger and drop a bomb in a residential area that kills 100s of innocent people even more powerful then this brave photographers photo of killing a civilian, like WW2 atomic bomber dropping on Japan. i wonder how far humans will reach away from humanity......?

Abdallah,
Saddam Hussain's brother, popularly called 'Chemical Ali' poured chemicals that burned and killed 4,000 villagers in northern Iraq. That was two decades back. Just two weeks back, 1000 muslims joined burnt 70 Hindu owned businesses after looting in West Bengal, India. There will be no photos of these things, because not all killers will allow photographers.

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2016 at 22:13 UTC
In reply to:

JordanAT: On paper, as a still camera, this looks like a rebadge and a price bump. Similar lens (range, aperture), same sensor, same size, same battery life, same sensitivity, frame rate, and shutter speed range, and a bit heaver. So, for still photogs, they're adding a touchscreen for $400?

Actually aperture is a little bit less. Meaning need of one step higher iso/higher noise and loss of bokeh that cannot be compensated.

Link | Posted on Dec 13, 2016 at 01:15 UTC
Total: 380, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »